updateHEADmaster

1 files changed, 253 insertions, 211 deletions

diff --git a/2025/captions/emacsconf-2025-zettelkasten--zettelkasten-for-regular-emacs-hackers--christian-tietze--answers.vtt b/2025/captions/emacsconf-2025-zettelkasten--zettelkasten-for-regular-emacs-hackers--christian-tietze--answers.vtt
index 5abfd435..0362cbc2 100644
--- a/2025/captions/emacsconf-2025-zettelkasten--zettelkasten-for-regular-emacs-hackers--christian-tietze--answers.vtt
+++ b/2025/captions/emacsconf-2025-zettelkasten--zettelkasten-for-regular-emacs-hackers--christian-tietze--answers.vtt
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ into your Zettelkasten then. Is that what's happening?
 00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:49.559
 Well, I can start you off.
 
+NOTE Q: What do you use for the fancy animations?
+
 00:00:49.560 --> 00:00:56.279
 The first question is, I wonder what they use for the fancy animations.
 
@@ -162,6 +164,8 @@ And the stack, the stack is Apple Keynote, sorry.
 00:03:25.440 --> 00:03:30.079
 Okay, that's enough. Thank you for capturing.
 
+NOTE Q: Are you not a fan of using *, **, *** headings in org-mode?
+
 00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:37.719
 Are you not a fan? Okay. You saw this in the recording.
 
@@ -196,7 +200,7 @@ It's interesting to see how people have different styles of writing org content.
 Am I not? What exactly? What did I do?
 
 00:04:22.360 --> 00:04:25.959
-And nodes, just open one of these.
+And notes, just open one of these.
 
 00:04:25.960 --> 00:04:33.519
 Okay. I could see how you could, in examples like this,
@@ -247,7 +251,7 @@ I mean, or even headings.
 The only heading here is the title,
 
 00:05:21.560 --> 00:05:24.279
-like in my perception of this node,
+like in my perception of this note,
 
 00:05:24.280 --> 00:05:27.159
 and it's one, It's two lists.
@@ -343,12 +347,12 @@ but I'm going to stop copying them in because I lose time.
 I want to reply to you, folks.
 
 00:07:09.440 --> 00:07:11.479
-Didn't see a need for a rack constructor.
+Didn't see a need for hierarchical structure.
 
 00:07:11.480 --> 00:07:13.719
 Thank you for capturing this. Next question.
 
-NOTE Can you use org files and all its features inside Denote?
+NOTE Q: Can you use org files and all its features inside Denote?
 
 00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:17.799
 Can you use org files and all its features inside Denote?
@@ -369,7 +373,7 @@ And with org, you get these attributes,
 value attribute thingies
 
 00:07:36.360 --> 00:07:40.079
-that are then the metadata for the node.
+that are then the metadata for the note.
 
 00:07:40.080 --> 00:07:45.279
 So yeah, the answer is yes. You get everything and on top,
@@ -380,7 +384,7 @@ a small layer of a link, link management.
 00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:48.999
 That's all there is.
 
-NOTE Where or how do you like to capture fleeting notes?
+NOTE Q: Where or how do you like to capture fleeting notes?
 
 00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:55.319
 Next question is, where or how do you like to capture fleeting notes?
@@ -419,25 +423,25 @@ isn't very descriptive. So what else do you say there?
 And people have said a couple of things
 
 00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:28.479
-to define non-fleeting nodes, for example, permanent nodes.
+to define non-fleeting notes, for example, permanent notes.
 
 00:08:28.480 --> 00:08:33.199
 I guess that's a Sonke Ahrens,
 
 00:08:33.200 --> 00:08:35.039
-permanent nodes is the most popular.
+permanent notes is the most popular.
 
 00:08:35.040 --> 00:08:36.159
 Let's stay with that, stick with that.
 
 00:08:36.160 --> 00:08:38.279
-So if you have permanent nodes and fleeting nodes,
+So if you have permanent notes and fleeting notes,
 
 00:08:38.280 --> 00:08:41.599
-now we have two types of nodes. The thing is, in books,
+now we have two types of notes. The thing is, in books,
 
 00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:46.319
-the only, when we would talk about note-taking
+the only... when we would talk about note-taking
 
 00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:47.679
 and you would ask me, hey Christian,
@@ -458,7 +462,7 @@ I would pull out a book,
 this is Object-Oriented Software Engineering,
 
 00:08:59.800 --> 00:09:03.679
-interesting book by Iva Jacobson or Iva, Iva,
+interesting book by Ivar Jacobson.
 
 00:09:03.680 --> 00:09:06.159
 I'm not sure because, you know,
@@ -475,26 +479,26 @@ are actual paper notes square what are these three by something inch
 00:09:18.880 --> 00:09:20.999
 American standard size I guess
 
-00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:24.039
+00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:25.964
 and A6 minus the tariff part
 
-00:09:24.040 --> 00:09:29.439
-from from another notepad these are notes i took engagement notes
+00:09:25.965 --> 00:09:31.174
+from another notepad. These are notes I took, engagement notes
 
-00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:32.439
-if you will like engagement notes
+00:09:31.175 --> 00:09:32.439
+if you will, like engagement notes,
 
 00:09:32.440 --> 00:09:34.999
-because the margins of the book don't suffice to take
+because the margins of the book don't suffice to take,
 
 00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:38.799
-and this is related to i need more space so this is more space
+and this is related to... I need more space, so this is more space.
 
 00:09:38.800 --> 00:09:41.119
-these are fleeting
+These are fleeting.
 
 00:09:41.120 --> 00:09:44.999
-and as you see I have them in my pile of books
+As you see, I have them in my pile of books
 
 00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:46.839
 right next to me in the shelf
@@ -503,7 +507,7 @@ right next to me in the shelf
 and folded them in this piece of paper,
 
 00:09:52.280 --> 00:09:54.879
-labeled it with the author because I lost them.
+labeled it with the author because I lost them
 
 00:09:54.880 --> 00:09:57.839
 couple of times they just fell out
@@ -610,6 +614,8 @@ I'm not going to talk about these
 00:11:27.800 --> 00:11:29.039
 unless someone asks a question.
 
+NOTE Q: Zettelkasten feels like a very "cagey" approach to note-taking and knowledge management. Doesn't it restrict one to think in certain ways rather than what feels natural to someone?
+
 00:11:29.040 --> 00:11:32.119
 Zettelkasten feels like a very cagey approach
 
@@ -823,14 +829,19 @@ I'm feeling like stuck at this and that.
 00:15:01.320 --> 00:15:03.919
 And then other people will be able to relate.
 
-00:15:03.920 --> 00:15:10.279
-I can promise. How does it denote, question mark maybe,
+00:15:03.920 --> 00:15:07.327
+I can promise.
+
+NOTE Q: How does denote compare to org-roam?
+
+00:15:07.328 --> 00:15:10.279
+How does it denote, question mark maybe,
 
 00:15:10.280 --> 00:15:11.639
 compared to org-roam?
 
 00:15:11.640 --> 00:15:18.559
-Roam research was setting a new trend of connectiveness
+Roam Research was setting a new trend of connectiveness
 
 00:15:18.560 --> 00:15:21.119
 because you could create recursive structures with links
@@ -872,7 +883,7 @@ when people told their stories of how they used it.
 I guess you can use this tool for a lot of purposes,
 
 00:15:53.440 --> 00:15:59.199
-but the prevailing story of the Rome style note-taking tools
+but the prevailing story of the Roam-style note-taking tools
 
 00:15:59.200 --> 00:16:01.879
 was like, just dump everything in it.
@@ -917,15 +928,15 @@ and that many months old when you did this.
 So we have some reference parts. And I could put this kind
 
 00:16:35.360 --> 00:16:37.399
-of factual information, et cetera, custom,
+of factual information in Zettelkasten,
 
 00:16:37.400 --> 00:16:42.199
 but also, like, what if I have a toothache or whatever,
 
-00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:47.479
+00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:44.924
 and just want to gather data for whatever reason?
 
-00:16:47.480 --> 00:16:52.119
+00:16:44.925 --> 00:16:52.119
 I don't know. Like this kind of personal stuff.
 
 00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:55.639
@@ -938,7 +949,7 @@ in a tool that I want to use to think.
 I do see the appeal there.
 
 00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:04.039
-But anyway, the org-roam, like that's a roam part.
+But anyway, the org-roam, like that's a Roam part.
 
 00:17:04.040 --> 00:17:05.879
 You can watch a lot of videos
@@ -1030,50 +1041,52 @@ but I'm very happy that org-roam still exists
 00:18:21.760 --> 00:18:25.039
 because I think porting tools into emacs is very cool,
 
+NOTE Q: I noticed that the wikipedia link you wrote was typed wrongly - and it got me thinking about how to deal with broken links at scale? Do you have any thoughts on this? What about archival?
+
 00:18:25.040 --> 00:18:27.559
 I guess next question,
 
-00:18:27.560 --> 00:18:31.839
+00:18:27.560 --> 00:18:29.174
 I noticed that the wikipedia link you wrote
 
-00:18:31.840 --> 00:18:40.279
+00:18:29.175 --> 00:18:38.632
 was typed wrongly, oh no garbage in, garbage out,
 
-00:18:40.280 --> 00:18:45.079
-I think garbage in, garbage out, garbage well spotted
+00:18:38.633 --> 00:18:45.079
+I think garbage in, garbage out, garbage well spotted.
 
 00:18:45.080 --> 00:18:47.199
-how do you do that oh I typed it
+How do you do that? Oh, I typed it
 
 00:18:47.200 --> 00:18:50.679
-I typed it from yeah right i didn't
+I typed it from... Yeah, right. I didn't,
 
 00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:53.359
-i didn't paste this right yeah yeah
+I didn't paste this. Right. Yeah, yeah.
 
 00:18:53.360 --> 00:18:55.879
-this janitorial tasks that's the umbrella term
+Janitorial tasks, that's the umbrella term.
 
 00:18:55.880 --> 00:18:56.839
-how do you deal with this
+How do you deal with this?
 
 00:18:56.840 --> 00:18:59.560
-like if you put stuff like this into into your notes
+Like if you put stuff like this into your notes,
 
 00:18:59.560 --> 00:19:05.759
 you hopefully get a 404 code from wikipedia
 
-00:19:05.760 --> 00:19:07.559
-because the page doesn't exist
+00:19:05.760 --> 00:19:06.859
+because the page doesn't exist.
 
-00:19:07.560 --> 00:19:11.999
-let's not check um you get a 404 and then you could write a tool
+00:19:06.860 --> 00:19:11.999
+Let's now check. You get a 404, and then you could write a tool
 
 00:19:12.000 --> 00:19:13.799
 that checks all the links periodically
 
 00:19:13.800 --> 00:19:17.199
-and tells you about broken links like a broken link checker
+and tells you about broken links, like a broken link checker
 
 00:19:17.200 --> 00:19:19.679
 that then looks up maybe automatically
@@ -1085,19 +1098,19 @@ the last good version on archive.org
 and then the Wayback Machine
 
 00:19:23.320 --> 00:19:26.879
-and then corrects the link with the archived version
+and then corrects the link with the archived version,
 
 00:19:26.880 --> 00:19:30.479
-because the live one is gone like this happens all the time on the internet
+because the live one is gone. This happens all the time on the Internet.
 
 00:19:30.480 --> 00:19:31.919
-and even if you don't mistype
+Even if you don't mistype,
 
 00:19:31.920 --> 00:19:35.879
-you could you know things go out of out of order so
+you could... you know things go out of order so
 
 00:19:35.880 --> 00:19:42.599
-What do you do with that? You need to automate this.
+what do you do with that? You need to automate this.
 
 00:19:42.600 --> 00:19:45.119
 I'm not clicking every link manually.
@@ -1108,10 +1121,10 @@ I have like, what's it now, 11,000 notes or something.
 00:19:49.280 --> 00:19:51.999
 This is not a thing that humans are good at.
 
-00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:52.919
+00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:52.279
 I'm not good at this.
 
-00:19:52.920 --> 00:19:55.359
+00:19:52.280 --> 00:19:55.359
 I will never finish anything else if I do this manually.
 
 00:19:55.360 --> 00:19:57.079
@@ -1133,7 +1146,7 @@ and that should help.
 You could automate this in Emacs, of course, right?
 
 00:20:09.760 --> 00:20:12.479
-For every file in my node directory,
+For every file in my note directory,
 
 00:20:12.480 --> 00:20:14.359
 look if there's a link inside
@@ -1142,7 +1155,7 @@ look if there's a link inside
 and then check the URL or whatever.
 
 00:20:16.120 --> 00:20:18.319
-Also works for inter-node connections.
+Also works for inter-note connections.
 
 00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:21.239
 This could also break if you rename files or remove files
@@ -1169,13 +1182,13 @@ and you need to deal with mistakes
 and heal and create scar tissue there in some way
 
 00:20:44.360 --> 00:20:48.279
-so write janitorial tools to do that it's also,
+so write janitorial tools to do that. It's also,
 
 00:20:48.280 --> 00:20:50.679
-i'm mentioning the term janitorial tools
+I'm mentioning the term janitorial tools
 
 00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:51.679
-a couple of times now
+a couple of times now,
 
 00:20:51.680 --> 00:20:55.439
 because that's the term that we in the forums at least
@@ -1187,10 +1200,10 @@ usually talk about things like find orphaned notes,
 notes that no one links to find broken links,
 
 00:21:02.120 --> 00:21:07.479
-clean up references reformat nodes, stuff like this.
+clean up references reformat notes, stuff like this.
 
 00:21:07.480 --> 00:21:10.039
-Find large nodes and then suggest them
+Find large notes and then suggest them
 
 00:21:10.040 --> 00:21:11.799
 to the user to break them up.
@@ -1198,23 +1211,25 @@ to the user to break them up.
 00:21:11.800 --> 00:21:14.180
 Like these are tasks that you can do mechanically,
 
-00:21:14.160 --> 00:21:21.719
+00:21:14.160 --> 00:21:16.382
 but also it's better if you use a tool to get started,
 
-00:21:21.720 --> 00:21:27.519
+00:21:16.383 --> 00:21:20.590
 otherwise you waste a lot of time.
 
-00:21:27.520 --> 00:21:35.199
+NOTE Comment: When I completely re-worked my config some two years ago, I also tried out some of these packages for making notes in Emacs...
+
+00:21:20.591 --> 00:21:26.632
 Next question, when I complete, next long question.
 
-00:21:35.200 --> 00:21:39.239
-I'm going to copy this over because maybe
+00:21:26.633 --> 00:21:34.964
+I'm going to copy this over because maybe...
 
-00:21:39.240 --> 00:21:42.399
-When I completely reworked my configs from two years ago,
+00:21:34.965 --> 00:21:42.399
+"when I completely reworked my configs from two years ago,
 
 00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:44.839
-I also tried some of these packages for making nodes,
+I also tried some of these packages for making notes,
 
 00:21:44.840 --> 00:21:47.119
 but none of them actually fit my purpose,
@@ -1256,19 +1271,25 @@ when I took them time structures my thought and my notes
 but they would get lost if I split them up in a network
 
 00:22:20.360 --> 00:22:22.799
-like structure like a wiki etc custom my two cents
+like structure like a wiki, Zettelkasten my two cents
 
-00:22:22.800 --> 00:22:32.239
+00:22:22.800 --> 00:22:24.715
 by the way I work on legal sociological topics
 
-00:22:32.240 --> 00:22:37.439
-i'm a lawyer by training you know Luhmann was a german german style
+00:22:24.716 --> 00:22:29.452
+I'm a lawyer by training."
+
+00:22:29.453 --> 00:22:34.590
+You know, Luhmann was a German-style
+
+00:22:34.591 --> 00:22:35.632
+weird sociologist,
 
-00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:40.999
-weird sociologist
+00:22:35.633 --> 00:22:41.048
+and sociology studies are
 
-00:22:41.000 --> 00:22:43.999
-and sociology studies are like the first four semesters at university,
+00:22:41.049 --> 00:22:43.999
+like the first four semesters at university,
 
 00:22:44.000 --> 00:22:48.639
 where a lot of, I don't know any of the terms in English,
@@ -1289,7 +1310,7 @@ but nobody knew because they were not empirically backed.
 Some were empirically backed,
 
 00:23:00.120 --> 00:23:01.959
-and then also there was some sense making.
+and then also there was some sense-making.
 
 00:23:01.960 --> 00:23:03.599
 And then also in sociology,
@@ -1328,7 +1349,7 @@ or whatever it was called
 where she just dumped everything inside
 
 00:23:41.960 --> 00:23:44.759
-for her next project like an idea box,
+for her next project, like an idea box,
 
 00:23:44.760 --> 00:23:47.279
 like real physical things like oh, I want to, I don't know,
@@ -1369,6 +1390,8 @@ Sorry, I jumped. So my answer is, this was not a question,
 00:24:31.440 --> 00:24:34.799
 and I'm happy for you. So that's still an answer.
 
+NOTE Q: How Zettelkasten is useful for highly mathematical STEM academic fields like computer science or engineering fields?
+
 00:24:34.800 --> 00:24:38.639
 Next question. How Zettelkasten is useful
 
@@ -1432,35 +1455,35 @@ that people did over hundreds of years for you.
 00:25:35.920 --> 00:25:39.479
 That's an order. But there are also many textbooks.
 
-00:25:39.480 --> 00:25:42.759
+00:25:39.480 --> 00:25:42.059
 So opinions may vary. The presentation may vary.
 
-00:25:42.760 --> 00:25:48.279
+00:25:42.060 --> 00:25:43.674
 Some textbooks may click with you,
 
-00:25:48.280 --> 00:25:59.359
+00:25:43.675 --> 00:26:04.559
 while others stay opaque, and you can't get into the meat.
 
-00:25:59.360 --> 00:26:04.599
+00:26:04.560 --> 00:26:12.919
 Sorry, I'm just typing the answer right now.
 
-00:26:04.600 --> 00:26:13.319
+00:26:12.920 --> 00:26:17.379
 Copying information to another box is not, yeah.
 
-00:26:13.320 --> 00:26:17.719
+00:26:17.380 --> 00:26:19.090
 Yeah, let's see what the first answer is.
 
-00:26:17.720 --> 00:26:21.559
+00:26:19.091 --> 00:26:21.559
 Someone posted that Zettelkasten is great for mathematics,
 
 00:26:21.560 --> 00:26:22.919
 incredible for computer science.
 
 00:26:22.920 --> 00:26:25.439
-With OrgBabel you can have living source code, yes,
+With Org-Babel you can have living source code, yes,
 
 00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:26.719
-that you can execute from the node,
+that you can execute from the note,
 
 00:26:26.720 --> 00:26:28.479
 also true for a formula,
@@ -1475,7 +1498,7 @@ You can even use Agda if you want to.
 Ah, I think I know who typed the answer.
 
 00:26:39.280 --> 00:26:42.999
-Hello, Oliver. If you want to have living proofs in your nodes,
+Hello, Oliver. If you want to have living proofs in your notes,
 
 00:26:43.000 --> 00:26:47.719
 even inline LaTeX is in here. That's, yeah, yeah, yeah.
@@ -1490,13 +1513,13 @@ maybe your own summary.
 I would suggest add your own summary
 
 00:27:02.960 --> 00:27:11.299
-because we're looking at the etherpad, right?
+because we're looking at the Etherpad, right?
 
 00:27:11.300 --> 00:27:14.639
-Maybe I just copy this over so you can all the either
+Maybe I just copy this over so you can all...
 
 00:27:14.640 --> 00:27:30.879
-pets indentation is missing with what Org is doing.
+The Etherpad's indentation is missing with what Org is doing.
 
 00:27:30.880 --> 00:27:36.999
 And the answer was probably submitted by Oliver
@@ -1505,40 +1528,43 @@ And the answer was probably submitted by Oliver
 just in case someone wants to see
 
 00:27:40.480 --> 00:27:47.679
-who that could have been with the Acta reference
+who that could have been with the Agda reference
 
 00:27:47.680 --> 00:27:49.799
-because nobody uses Acta,
+because nobody uses Agda,
 
 00:27:49.800 --> 00:27:55.999
-nobody in the world maybe so Acta is just a yeah
+nobody in the world maybe. So Agda is just a, yeah,
 
 00:27:56.000 --> 00:28:01.319
 let's say it's good for proofing the code that you type
 
 00:28:01.320 --> 00:28:04.399
-as you type it in the compilation set very weird
+as you type it in the compilation set, very weird
 
 00:28:04.400 --> 00:28:07.199
-if you've never heard of this so check that out
+if you've never heard of this, so check that out.
 
 00:28:07.200 --> 00:28:13.839
-so question was how Zettelkasten is useful for these kinds of things
+So question was how Zettelkasten is useful for these kinds of things
 
 00:28:13.840 --> 00:28:16.119
 yeah it sounds like in these kinds of fields
 
 00:28:16.120 --> 00:28:18.359
-that you only deal with facts
+that you only deal with facts.
 
 00:28:18.360 --> 00:28:24.719
-that's also kind of sort of true for psychology where you have a lot of
+That's also kind of sort of true for psychology where you have a lot of,
 
 00:28:24.720 --> 00:28:29.639
-and also law where you at least in at least in German
+and also law, where you at least in German
+
+00:28:29.640 --> 00:28:32.011
+and our style of law where you have a lot of,
 
-00:28:29.640 --> 00:28:33.759
-and our style of law where you have a lot of where you have thick books of law
+00:28:32.012 --> 00:28:33.759
+where you have thick books of law
 
 00:28:33.760 --> 00:28:38.599
 and very very little records,
@@ -1546,11 +1572,17 @@ and very very little records,
 00:28:38.600 --> 00:28:41.479
 that's not the right phrasing,
 
-00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:48.239
-where you don't rely on the ruling as much as you do in, for example, the USA,
+00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:44.540
+where you don't rely on the ruling
+
+00:28:44.541 --> 00:28:48.239
+as much as you do in, for example, the USA,
 
-00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:53.919
-where you need to be aware of every court ruling to then put stuff into context
+00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:52.674
+where you need to be aware of every court ruling
+
+00:28:52.675 --> 00:28:53.919
+to then put stuff into context
 
 00:28:53.920 --> 00:28:58.999
 and all of this is like the current how you do law.
@@ -1862,13 +1894,13 @@ and you still have access to this later
 when you need to check your personal inventory
 
 00:34:21.800 --> 00:34:30.519
-of mathematical proofs so my answer would be
+of mathematical proofs so my answer would be...
 
 00:34:30.520 --> 00:34:33.119
-let's type in my answer
+Let's type in my answer
 
 00:34:33.120 --> 00:34:46.199
-on either pad would be I'm not able to type.
+on Etherpad would be... I'm not able to type.
 
 00:34:46.200 --> 00:34:52.599
 Sorry. My answer would be this.
@@ -1972,11 +2004,11 @@ and it's not just copying the thing into a box,
 00:36:50.640 --> 00:36:51.759
 like from one box into another,
 
-00:36:51.760 --> 00:36:53.879
+00:36:51.760 --> 00:36:54.019
 from the public internet box into my own buffer,
 
-00:36:53.880 --> 00:36:56.399
-that's a custom that's closer to me,
+00:36:54.020 --> 00:36:56.399
+that Zettelkasten that's closer to me,
 
 00:36:56.400 --> 00:36:58.559
 like a fridge is closer to my kitchen
@@ -2101,26 +2133,28 @@ Just check it out for yourself. I'm not sure.
 00:39:39.320 --> 00:39:40.959
 Next question, sorry.
 
+NOTE Q: In your experience, would you say that you re-use most of your notes?
+
 00:39:40.960 --> 00:39:45.639
-In your experience, would you say that you reuse most of your nodes?
+In your experience, would you say that you reuse most of your notes?
 
 00:39:45.640 --> 00:39:47.959
-Watching your demo, I thought that more nodes you create,
+Watching your demo, I thought that more notes you create,
 
 00:39:47.960 --> 00:39:51.279
 the less you might reuse them. Yes, that's true.
 
 00:39:51.280 --> 00:39:54.879
-I have 11,000 nodes or something,
+I have 11,000 notes or something,
 
 00:39:54.880 --> 00:39:57.239
-and I don't use 11,000 nodes every day.
+and I don't use 11,000 notes every day.
 
 00:39:57.240 --> 00:39:59.879
 I can only use a fraction of them.
 
 00:39:59.880 --> 00:40:06.439
-But let's say you have the Feynman Darling nodes,
+But let's say you have the Feynman Darling notes,
 
 00:40:06.440 --> 00:40:08.479
 then you would probably use these.
@@ -2132,7 +2166,7 @@ Imagine you have the same 12 Darlings for a year.
 Then you use these 12 thingies for one year more often.
 
 00:40:15.560 --> 00:40:17.919
-than most of your other nodes,
+than most of your other notes,
 
 00:40:17.920 --> 00:40:19.999
 because these become your entry points
@@ -2167,11 +2201,11 @@ maybe these 12 Feynman darlings were your darlings
 00:40:45.400 --> 00:40:47.719
 during university studies for STEM field,
 
-00:40:47.720 --> 00:40:49.479
+00:40:47.720 --> 00:40:49.339
 where you had a hard time figuring out
 
-00:40:49.480 --> 00:40:52.479
-how the technical system works for your benefit.
+00:40:49.340 --> 00:40:52.479
+how the Zettelkasten works for your benefit.
 
 00:40:52.480 --> 00:40:56.279
 And then five years later, you're in a job and you don't need all of them
@@ -2342,7 +2376,7 @@ where do you want to put the effort? and will it pay off?
 maybe if not, then maybe spend the time on something else
 
 00:43:54.480 --> 00:43:57.119
-like don't try to exactly customize something you hate
+like don't try to Zettelkastenify something you hate
 
 00:43:57.120 --> 00:43:59.519
 just to I don't know,
@@ -2354,13 +2388,15 @@ do your due diligence if you don't want to
 because then you'll hate the process
 
 00:44:06.720 --> 00:44:15.279
-that's worse than not using nodes a lot next questions,
+that's worse than not using notes a lot. Next question.
+
+NOTE Q: How are notes structured and accessed when the notes grow from 10K to 100K notes?
 
 00:44:15.280 --> 00:44:17.719
-how are nodes structured and accessed
+How are notes structured and accessed
 
 00:44:17.720 --> 00:44:20.639
-when the nodes grow from 10k to 100k nodes?
+when the notes grow from 10k to 100k notes?
 
 00:44:20.640 --> 00:44:22.119
 yes, that's a field of exploration,
@@ -2369,7 +2405,7 @@ yes, that's a field of exploration,
 I mean that the lower realm there I don't know anybody
 
 00:44:25.920 --> 00:44:32.359
-who's using a hyperlinked 100k node archive.
+who's using a hyperlinked 100k note archive.
 
 00:44:32.360 --> 00:44:37.239
 I do know people who have a lot of text files
@@ -2414,10 +2450,10 @@ I'm thinking about the stuff that I'm spending time on.
 What about that?
 
 00:45:18.840 --> 00:45:20.639
-Yeah, how are nodes structured and accessed
+Yeah, how are notes structured and accessed
 
 00:45:20.640 --> 00:45:22.919
-when the nodes go from one to 100k?
+when the notes go from one to 100k?
 
 00:45:22.920 --> 00:45:31.399
 I will imagine that it becomes a matter that's speculation.
@@ -2432,7 +2468,7 @@ it's going to be self-similar, like Mandelbrot images,
 where you have recursive patterns.
 
 00:45:43.200 --> 00:45:46.519
-First, you have a couple of nodes.
+First, you have a couple of notes.
 
 00:45:46.520 --> 00:45:49.759
 You can leave through them digitally or physically easily.
@@ -2456,7 +2492,7 @@ And the clue there is,
 Eventually, you have hundreds or maybe thousands,
 
 00:46:10.160 --> 00:46:12.359
-not hundreds or thousands, of structure nodes.
+not hundreds or thousands, of structure notes.
 
 00:46:12.360 --> 00:46:13.959
 And then you have the same problem
@@ -2468,13 +2504,13 @@ that you had on the lower base layer.
 And now you will probably look for another tool.
 
 00:46:19.200 --> 00:46:22.759
-But there is nothing else that's not also a structure node
+But there is nothing else that's not also a structure note
 
 00:46:22.760 --> 00:46:25.799
 but is structuring other structures mostly
 
 00:46:25.800 --> 00:46:28.119
-instead of structuring the low-level nodes.
+instead of structuring the low-level notes.
 
 00:46:28.120 --> 00:46:31.719
 But this distinction, I want to point out, doesn't pay off.
@@ -2483,25 +2519,25 @@ But this distinction, I want to point out, doesn't pay off.
 it seems like it doesn't pay off
 
 00:46:34.880 --> 00:46:37.319
-to say hey i have these foundational permanent nodes
+to say hey I have these foundational permanent notes
 
 00:46:37.320 --> 00:46:38.759
-and then i have these meta nodes
+And then I have these meta notes,
 
 00:46:38.760 --> 00:46:40.519
-these these maps and structures
+these maps and structures
 
 00:46:40.520 --> 00:46:42.759
-and then i have these super mega structures
+and then I have these super mega structures
 
 00:46:42.760 --> 00:46:44.159
-which are not permanent
+which are not permanent,
 
 00:46:44.160 --> 00:46:45.519
-which are not structures which are not
+which are not structures, which are not...
 
 00:46:45.520 --> 00:46:47.919
-I don't know this doesn't seem to pay off
+I don't know... This doesn't seem to pay off,
 
 00:46:47.920 --> 00:46:51.079
 because eventually there is another level and another level
@@ -2626,6 +2662,8 @@ and then see how people transparently evolve
 00:48:50.040 --> 00:48:55.159
 their gardens, their processes, their note-taking systems
 
+NOTE Q: I would be very interested in your thought on this video by Westenberg - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjSWwmg-JRM (Why I Deleted My Second Brain: A Journey Back to Real Thinking)
+
 00:48:55.160 --> 00:49:00.319
 next question not a question but i would be very interested
 
@@ -2633,16 +2671,16 @@ next question not a question but i would be very interested
 in your thoughts on this video
 
 00:49:01.560 --> 00:49:07.039
-by westenberg okay it's it's this is not spam
+by Westenberg. Okay. This is not spam.
 
 00:49:07.040 --> 00:49:13.959
-i i don't uh there's joe westenberg's uh youtube channel
+I don't... Uh, there's Joe Westenberg's Youtube channel,
 
 00:49:13.960 --> 00:49:15.319
-why i deleted my second brain
+"Why I Deleted My Second Brain:
 
 00:49:15.320 --> 00:49:22.679
-a journey back to real thinking uh
+A Journey Back to Real Thinking."
 
 00:49:22.680 --> 00:49:30.319
 I think I didn't watch the video but read an article.
@@ -2656,17 +2694,17 @@ It's not on screen sharing. That was stupid.
 00:49:36.216 --> 00:49:48.239
 I'm probably not going to watch it right now with everyone here,
 
-00:49:48.240 --> 00:49:53.479
+00:49:48.240 --> 00:49:51.659
 so my thoughts on deleting and stuff like that.
 
-00:49:53.480 --> 00:49:58.679
+00:49:51.660 --> 00:49:58.679
 I do remember there was a very cleverly written, well-written post
 
 00:49:58.680 --> 00:50:02.719
 and the claim was, from my perspective,
 
 00:50:02.720 --> 00:50:04.919
-and that's not doing the work of
+and that's not doing the work of...
 
 00:50:04.920 --> 00:50:13.199
 It's not doing the work of the author justice.
@@ -2894,7 +2932,7 @@ Now we come back to one of the earlier questions,
 like, why do I not use outlines?
 
 00:54:00.400 --> 00:54:03.039
-Because OrgNode allows me to do outlines.
+Because Org-node allows me to do outlines.
 
 00:54:03.040 --> 00:54:06.319
 Well, I try to write my notes as blog posts,
@@ -3013,14 +3051,14 @@ maybe maybe they tried to do too much with a different mindset
 00:56:11.480 --> 00:56:24.839
 and it just didn't click and then they,
 
-00:56:24.840 --> 00:56:27.199
+00:56:24.840 --> 00:56:25.519
 you know next question is there a danger?
 
-00:56:27.200 --> 00:56:41.959
+00:56:25.520 --> 00:56:34.340
 also, wait a second, answer do not probably a lot of collection,
 
-00:56:41.960 --> 00:56:52.359
-not a lot of stinking in the Zettelkasten to some purpose.
+00:56:34.341 --> 00:56:52.359
+not a lot of thinking in the Zettelkasten to some purpose.
 
 00:56:52.360 --> 00:56:58.700
 Usually. Conflation was the word I was fishing for.
@@ -3028,14 +3066,14 @@ Usually. Conflation was the word I was fishing for.
 00:56:58.701 --> 00:57:02.840
 Usually posts videos like this.
 
-00:57:02.841 --> 00:57:10.090
-Conflate note taking as a dumping ground
+00:57:02.841 --> 00:57:15.049
+Conflate note taking as a dumping ground for stuff
 
-00:57:10.091 --> 00:57:22.174
-for stuff with something that is valuable in the long term.
+00:57:15.050 --> 00:57:22.174
+with something that is valuable in the long term.
 
 00:57:22.175 --> 00:57:27.599
-Also if this was our dear friend Westenberg
+Also, if this was our dear friend Westenberg
 
 00:57:27.600 --> 00:57:30.439
 I think the note count also was higher,
@@ -3070,8 +3108,10 @@ you really want to solve in the long term.
 00:57:57.280 --> 00:57:59.159
 So next question.
 
+NOTE Q: Is there a danger that with the Zettelkasten process, that the process gets a bit in the way of the content?
+
 00:57:59.160 --> 00:58:02.359
-Is there a danger that with the settled custom process,
+Is there a danger that with the Zettelkasten process,
 
 00:58:02.360 --> 00:58:05.679
 that the process gets a bit in the way of the content?
@@ -3134,7 +3174,7 @@ having a title, hashtags, and content,
 and also being very, very careful about quoting my sources.
 
 00:59:32.400 --> 00:59:35.639
-I don't do much with my et cetera.
+I don't do much with my Zettelkasten.
 
 00:59:35.640 --> 00:59:37.679
 I cannot give up quoting my sources
@@ -3148,56 +3188,56 @@ forgetting where I get ideas from and confuse.
 00:59:41.880 --> 00:59:44.599
 And I get out because I'm aware of the problem there.
 
-00:59:44.600 --> 00:59:47.599
+00:59:44.600 --> 00:59:49.439
 I'm also not trusting my own notes anymore.
 
-00:59:47.600 --> 00:59:51.159
-would not be trusting my own notes anymore
+00:59:49.440 --> 00:59:51.159
+I would not be trusting my own notes anymore.
 
 00:59:51.160 --> 00:59:53.919
-i need to properly cite so then i can see hey
+I need to properly cite so then I can see, hey,
 
 00:59:53.920 --> 00:59:56.559
-this block has no quotations that's mine
+this block has no quotations, that's mine,
 
 00:59:56.560 --> 01:00:00.559
-and i can trust this it's not like hey this is maybe mine
+and I can trust this. It's not like, hey, this is maybe mine,
 
 01:00:00.560 --> 01:00:04.039
-maybe this is a verbatim quote from a book like this
+maybe this is a verbatim quote from a book. Like this
 
 01:00:04.040 --> 01:00:05.799
-is not helping that's a ceremony
+is not helping. That's a ceremony
 
 01:00:05.800 --> 01:00:09.039
-that's paying off in the long term also
+that's paying off in the long term also,
 
 01:00:09.040 --> 01:00:11.319
-so that when you write something
+so that when you write something,
 
 01:00:11.320 --> 01:00:15.159
-you have all the sources at hand
+you have all the sources at hand.
 
-01:00:15.160 --> 01:00:17.279
-that's a useful ceremony title
+01:00:15.160 --> 01:00:16.882
+That's a useful ceremony.
 
-01:00:17.280 --> 01:00:20.799
-is just a way of summarizing the content
+01:00:16.883 --> 01:00:20.799
+Title is just a way of summarizing the content.
 
 01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:25.119
-do it like an excerpt, right?
+Do it like an excerpt, right?
 
 01:00:25.120 --> 01:00:26.919
-you have the whole content, that's your etc.
+You have the whole content, that's your Zettel.
 
 01:00:26.920 --> 01:00:29.879
-do a short summary, that may be your introduction.
+Do a short summary, that may be your introduction.
 
 01:00:29.880 --> 01:00:33.239
 So have a way to quickly get a glimpse of the relevance
 
 01:00:33.240 --> 01:00:35.919
-before having to read the whole settle
+before having to read the whole Zettel
 
 01:00:35.920 --> 01:00:38.719
 when you encounter it years from now.
@@ -3212,7 +3252,7 @@ and then have an even more condensed form that's a title.
 The title is basically your API,
 
 01:00:45.680 --> 01:00:49.359
-the interface for you and your nodes.
+the interface for you and your notes.
 
 01:00:49.360 --> 01:00:54.879
 And it needs to uphold some kind of contract.
@@ -3253,14 +3293,14 @@ titles don't always stay consistent or constant
 01:01:28.320 --> 01:01:31.079
 that's why I don't link by title, because I would then need
 
-01:01:31.080 --> 01:01:34.279
-to go through my node archive and also need to go to
+01:01:31.080 --> 01:01:39.299
+to go through my note archive and also need to go to
 
-01:01:34.280 --> 01:01:39.999
-my node archive and need to correct all the links
+01:01:39.300 --> 01:01:41.090
+my note archive and need to correct all the links.
 
-01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:44.039
-that's a janitorial task I like to not do, if I can
+01:01:41.091 --> 01:01:44.039
+That's a janitorial task I like to not do, if I can.
 
 01:01:44.040 --> 01:01:49.759
 So answer here, less ceremony, fewer ceremonies, plural.
@@ -3269,7 +3309,7 @@ So answer here, less ceremony, fewer ceremonies, plural.
 Try to only do the minimum possible, minimum viable thing.
 
 01:01:54.360 --> 01:01:57.599
-And using Emacs and D-Node, you get a lot of defaults.
+And using Emacs and Denote, you get a lot of defaults.
 
 01:01:57.600 --> 01:01:58.719
 And then you need to worry
@@ -3314,10 +3354,10 @@ in the search results all the time.
 That's not as useful as having a pathway
 
 01:02:45.680 --> 01:02:49.559
-through your nodes that you can follow.
+through your notes that you can follow.
 
 01:02:49.560 --> 01:02:52.039
-It may not be a pathway through all of your nodes, of course,
+It may not be a pathway through all of your notes, of course,
 
 01:02:52.040 --> 01:02:56.159
 but it may be a pathway from entry point into some topic.
@@ -3343,8 +3383,10 @@ more or less, and then you're good.
 01:03:15.240 --> 01:03:20.639
 I hope. Wishing you all the best. Next and last question.
 
+NOTE Q: How do you navigate looking at all posts with certain tags
+
 01:03:20.640 --> 01:03:24.519
-How do you navigate looking at all posts with a certain text?
+How do you navigate looking at all posts with certain tags?
 
 01:03:24.520 --> 01:03:26.679
 This might be an emacs, already new to emacs.
@@ -3352,23 +3394,23 @@ This might be an emacs, already new to emacs.
 01:03:26.680 --> 01:03:28.679
 I just may have answered this.
 
-01:03:28.680 --> 01:03:40.159
-How do you navigate looking at all posts with a certain text?
+01:03:28.680 --> 01:03:31.799
+How do you navigate looking at all posts with certain tags?
 
-01:03:40.160 --> 01:03:42.959
-Let me go to my actual node archive.
+01:03:31.800 --> 01:03:43.215
+Let me go to my actual note archive,
 
-01:03:42.960 --> 01:03:55.919
-and then php no language learning ah
+01:03:43.216 --> 01:03:55.919
+and then php, no, language learning, ah,
 
 01:03:55.920 --> 01:03:59.319
-this is not my setup I'm very clumsy
+this is not a nice setup. I'm very clumsy.
 
 01:03:59.320 --> 01:04:03.119
-I'm sorry, I don't know swift language learning
+I'm sorry, I don't know, swift, language learning,
 
 01:04:03.120 --> 01:04:28.465
-ah that's that's a boring one php By this time, I could have also,
+ah that's a boring one, php. By this time, I could have also,
 
 01:04:28.466 --> 01:04:35.299
 ah, there's the model. This would be an entry point
@@ -3512,7 +3554,7 @@ Why do I show this when the question is about tags?
 Because if I search for... Which one do I take?
 
 01:07:10.920 --> 01:07:22.719
-Let's try grep. php. Yep, grep exited the anomaly.
+Let's try grep. php. Yep, grep exited abnormally.
 
 01:07:22.720 --> 01:07:28.039
 Dang, why? Option requires an argument.
@@ -3611,7 +3653,7 @@ And the hashtag-based search would be I don't know what I'm looking for.
 It was PHP related. I hope I use the hashtag correctly
 
 01:09:32.960 --> 01:09:36.879
-and then kill all these nodes from my archive.
+and then kill all these notes from my archive.
 
 01:09:36.880 --> 01:09:38.959
 The metaphor doesn't work that way,
@@ -3620,7 +3662,7 @@ The metaphor doesn't work that way,
 but still you get a lot of results here
 
 01:09:41.280 --> 01:09:45.959
-and you could use this as a way to filter from 11,000 nodes
+and you could use this as a way to filter from 11,000 notes
 
 01:09:45.960 --> 01:09:53.559
 down to 50 or so, maybe less.
@@ -3629,10 +3671,10 @@ down to 50 or so, maybe less.
 And if you got this far, then you can start to do it in a mechanical way again.
 
 01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:05.279
-But wait, if you have 100 or 1000 nodes in the results there,
+But wait, if you have 100 or 1000 notes in the results there,
 
 01:10:05.280 --> 01:10:08.279
-then you can't mechanically go through all the nodes again.
+then you can't mechanically go through all the notes again.
 
 01:10:08.280 --> 01:10:09.919
 You can maybe skim and look
@@ -3713,7 +3755,7 @@ but they're also not closely interrelated,
 you will have read five to 10 different sources that you could process.
 
 01:11:33.640 --> 01:11:36.319
-You could maybe then also create an overview node
+You could maybe then also create an overview note
 
 01:11:36.320 --> 01:11:38.359
 as a preparation for the seminar
@@ -3725,7 +3767,7 @@ whatever happens at university.
 Then the hashtag becomes just a way to group things.
 
 01:11:51.200 --> 01:11:52.479
-But once you create the structure node,
+But once you create the structure note,
 
 01:11:52.480 --> 01:11:55.039
 you don't need the hashtags to navigate anymore.
@@ -3910,17 +3952,17 @@ I think these are all the questions.
 01:15:44.080 --> 01:15:47.159
 I'm going to delete the leftover ones.
 
-01:15:47.160 --> 01:15:52.439
+01:15:47.160 --> 01:15:54.719
 I hope you enjoyed some of the answers.
 
-01:15:52.440 --> 01:15:58.159
+01:15:54.720 --> 01:16:01.174
 Thank you so much. Thank you. That's a lot.
 
-01:15:58.160 --> 01:16:02.759
-We'll go back and get everything transcribed as well
+01:16:01.175 --> 01:16:04.674
+We'll go back and get everything transcribed as well,
 
-01:16:02.760 --> 01:16:08.599
-and then you can turn that into other articles in the future
+01:16:04.675 --> 01:16:08.599
+and then you can turn that into other articles in the future,
 
 01:16:08.600 --> 01:16:10.119
 because that's how this all works, right?
@@ -3941,7 +3983,7 @@ It's only useful to transfer language before writing,
 but now you can just read.
 
 01:16:26.280 --> 01:16:29.719
-We have two people in the big blue button room
+We have two people in the Big Blue Button room
 
 01:16:29.720 --> 01:16:33.799
 who are still around, but I think they've got their, like,
@@ -3953,7 +3995,7 @@ they don't have microphones set up.
 So I don't know if you want to just, like, CryptKNFL,
 
 01:16:40.680 --> 01:16:44.339
-if you want to just follow up through the etherpad,
+if you want to just follow up through the Etherpadmp,
 
 01:16:44.340 --> 01:16:47.639
 or email, I guess, in case you have further questions.