Well, I can start you off. +NOTE Q: What do you use for the fancy animations? +
The first question is, I wonder what they use for the fancy animations. @@ -162,6 +164,8 @@ And the stack, the stack is Apple Keynote, sorry.
Okay, that's enough. Thank you for capturing. +NOTE Q: Are you not a fan of using *, **, *** headings in org-mode? +
Are you not a fan? Okay. You saw this in the recording. @@ -196,7 +200,7 @@ It's interesting to see how people have different styles of writing org content. Am I not? What exactly? What did I do?
-And nodes, just open one of these. +And notes, just open one of these.
Okay. I could see how you could, in examples like this, @@ -247,7 +251,7 @@ I mean, or even headings. The only heading here is the title,
-like in my perception of this node, +like in my perception of this note,
and it's one, It's two lists. @@ -343,12 +347,12 @@ but I'm going to stop copying them in because I lose time. I want to reply to you, folks.
-Didn't see a need for a rack constructor. +Didn't see a need for hierarchical structure.
Thank you for capturing this. Next question. -NOTE Can you use org files and all its features inside Denote? +NOTE Q: Can you use org files and all its features inside Denote?
Can you use org files and all its features inside Denote? @@ -369,7 +373,7 @@ And with org, you get these attributes, value attribute thingies
-that are then the metadata for the node. +that are then the metadata for the note.
So yeah, the answer is yes. You get everything and on top, @@ -380,7 +384,7 @@ a small layer of a link, link management.
That's all there is. -NOTE Where or how do you like to capture fleeting notes? +NOTE Q: Where or how do you like to capture fleeting notes?
Next question is, where or how do you like to capture fleeting notes? @@ -419,25 +423,25 @@ isn't very descriptive. So what else do you say there? And people have said a couple of things
-to define non-fleeting nodes, for example, permanent nodes. +to define non-fleeting notes, for example, permanent notes.
I guess that's a Sonke Ahrens,
-permanent nodes is the most popular. +permanent notes is the most popular.
Let's stay with that, stick with that.
-So if you have permanent nodes and fleeting nodes, +So if you have permanent notes and fleeting notes,
-now we have two types of nodes. The thing is, in books, +now we have two types of notes. The thing is, in books,
-the only, when we would talk about note-taking +the only... when we would talk about note-taking
and you would ask me, hey Christian, @@ -458,7 +462,7 @@ I would pull out a book, this is Object-Oriented Software Engineering,
-interesting book by Iva Jacobson or Iva, Iva, +interesting book by Ivar Jacobson.
I'm not sure because, you know, @@ -475,26 +479,26 @@ are actual paper notes square what are these three by something inch
American standard size I guess
+00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:25.964 and A6 minus the tariff part
-from from another notepad these are notes i took engagement notes +00:09:25.965 --> 00:09:31.174 +from another notepad. These are notes I took, engagement notes
-if you will like engagement notes +00:09:31.175 --> 00:09:32.439 +if you will, like engagement notes,
-because the margins of the book don't suffice to take +because the margins of the book don't suffice to take,
-and this is related to i need more space so this is more space +and this is related to... I need more space, so this is more space.
-these are fleeting +These are fleeting.
-and as you see I have them in my pile of books +As you see, I have them in my pile of books
right next to me in the shelf @@ -503,7 +507,7 @@ right next to me in the shelf and folded them in this piece of paper,
-labeled it with the author because I lost them. +labeled it with the author because I lost them
couple of times they just fell out @@ -610,6 +614,8 @@ I'm not going to talk about these
unless someone asks a question. +NOTE Q: Zettelkasten feels like a very "cagey" approach to note-taking and knowledge management. Doesn't it restrict one to think in certain ways rather than what feels natural to someone? +
Zettelkasten feels like a very cagey approach @@ -823,14 +829,19 @@ I'm feeling like stuck at this and that.
And then other people will be able to relate.
-I can promise. How does it denote, question mark maybe, +00:15:03.920 --> 00:15:07.327 +I can promise. + +NOTE Q: How does denote compare to org-roam? + +00:15:07.328 --> 00:15:10.279 +How does it denote, question mark maybe,
compared to org-roam?
-Roam research was setting a new trend of connectiveness +Roam Research was setting a new trend of connectiveness
because you could create recursive structures with links @@ -872,7 +883,7 @@ when people told their stories of how they used it. I guess you can use this tool for a lot of purposes,
-but the prevailing story of the Rome style note-taking tools +but the prevailing story of the Roam-style note-taking tools
was like, just dump everything in it. @@ -917,15 +928,15 @@ and that many months old when you did this. So we have some reference parts. And I could put this kind
-of factual information, et cetera, custom, +of factual information in Zettelkasten,
but also, like, what if I have a toothache or whatever,
+00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:44.924 and just want to gather data for whatever reason?
+00:16:44.925 --> 00:16:52.119 I don't know. Like this kind of personal stuff.
@@ -938,7 +949,7 @@ in a tool that I want to use to think. I do see the appeal there.
-But anyway, the org-roam, like that's a roam part. +But anyway, the org-roam, like that's a Roam part.
You can watch a lot of videos @@ -1030,50 +1041,52 @@ but I'm very happy that org-roam still exists
because I think porting tools into emacs is very cool, +NOTE Q: I noticed that the wikipedia link you wrote was typed wrongly - and it got me thinking about how to deal with broken links at scale? Do you have any thoughts on this? What about archival? +
I guess next question,
+00:18:27.560 --> 00:18:29.174 I noticed that the wikipedia link you wrote
+00:18:29.175 --> 00:18:38.632 was typed wrongly, oh no garbage in, garbage out,
-I think garbage in, garbage out, garbage well spotted +00:18:38.633 --> 00:18:45.079 +I think garbage in, garbage out, garbage well spotted.
-how do you do that oh I typed it +How do you do that? Oh, I typed it
-I typed it from yeah right i didn't +I typed it from... Yeah, right. I didn't,
-i didn't paste this right yeah yeah +I didn't paste this. Right. Yeah, yeah.
-this janitorial tasks that's the umbrella term +Janitorial tasks, that's the umbrella term.
-how do you deal with this +How do you deal with this?
-like if you put stuff like this into into your notes +Like if you put stuff like this into your notes,
you hopefully get a 404 code from wikipedia
-because the page doesn't exist +00:19:05.760 --> 00:19:06.859 +because the page doesn't exist.
-let's not check um you get a 404 and then you could write a tool +00:19:06.860 --> 00:19:11.999 +Let's now check. You get a 404, and then you could write a tool
that checks all the links periodically
-and tells you about broken links like a broken link checker +and tells you about broken links, like a broken link checker
that then looks up maybe automatically @@ -1085,19 +1098,19 @@ the last good version on archive.org and then the Wayback Machine
-and then corrects the link with the archived version +and then corrects the link with the archived version,
-because the live one is gone like this happens all the time on the internet +because the live one is gone. This happens all the time on the Internet.
-and even if you don't mistype +Even if you don't mistype,
-you could you know things go out of out of order so +you could... you know things go out of order so
-What do you do with that? You need to automate this. +what do you do with that? You need to automate this.
I'm not clicking every link manually. @@ -1108,10 +1121,10 @@ I have like, what's it now, 11,000 notes or something.
This is not a thing that humans are good at.
+00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:52.279 I'm not good at this.
+00:19:52.280 --> 00:19:55.359 I will never finish anything else if I do this manually.
@@ -1133,7 +1146,7 @@ and that should help. You could automate this in Emacs, of course, right?
-For every file in my node directory, +For every file in my note directory,
look if there's a link inside @@ -1142,7 +1155,7 @@ look if there's a link inside and then check the URL or whatever.
-Also works for inter-node connections. +Also works for inter-note connections.
This could also break if you rename files or remove files @@ -1169,13 +1182,13 @@ and you need to deal with mistakes and heal and create scar tissue there in some way
-so write janitorial tools to do that it's also, +so write janitorial tools to do that. It's also,
-i'm mentioning the term janitorial tools +I'm mentioning the term janitorial tools
-a couple of times now +a couple of times now,
because that's the term that we in the forums at least @@ -1187,10 +1200,10 @@ usually talk about things like find orphaned notes, notes that no one links to find broken links,
-clean up references reformat nodes, stuff like this. +clean up references reformat notes, stuff like this.
-Find large nodes and then suggest them +Find large notes and then suggest them
to the user to break them up. @@ -1198,23 +1211,25 @@ to the user to break them up.
Like these are tasks that you can do mechanically,
+00:21:14.160 --> 00:21:16.382 but also it's better if you use a tool to get started,
+00:21:16.383 --> 00:21:20.590 otherwise you waste a lot of time.
+NOTE Comment: When I completely re-worked my config some two years ago, I also tried out some of these packages for making notes in Emacs... + +00:21:20.591 --> 00:21:26.632 Next question, when I complete, next long question.
-I'm going to copy this over because maybe +00:21:26.633 --> 00:21:34.964 +I'm going to copy this over because maybe...
-When I completely reworked my configs from two years ago, +00:21:34.965 --> 00:21:42.399 +"when I completely reworked my configs from two years ago,
-I also tried some of these packages for making nodes, +I also tried some of these packages for making notes,
but none of them actually fit my purpose, @@ -1256,19 +1271,25 @@ when I took them time structures my thought and my notes but they would get lost if I split them up in a network
-like structure like a wiki etc custom my two cents +like structure like a wiki, Zettelkasten my two cents
+00:22:22.800 --> 00:22:24.715 by the way I work on legal sociological topics
-i'm a lawyer by training you know Luhmann was a german german style +00:22:24.716 --> 00:22:29.452 +I'm a lawyer by training." + +00:22:29.453 --> 00:22:34.590 +You know, Luhmann was a German-style + +00:22:34.591 --> 00:22:35.632 +weird sociologist,
-weird sociologist +00:22:35.633 --> 00:22:41.048 +and sociology studies are
-and sociology studies are like the first four semesters at university, +00:22:41.049 --> 00:22:43.999 +like the first four semesters at university,
where a lot of, I don't know any of the terms in English, @@ -1289,7 +1310,7 @@ but nobody knew because they were not empirically backed. Some were empirically backed,
-and then also there was some sense making. +and then also there was some sense-making.
And then also in sociology, @@ -1328,7 +1349,7 @@ or whatever it was called where she just dumped everything inside
-for her next project like an idea box, +for her next project, like an idea box,
like real physical things like oh, I want to, I don't know, @@ -1369,6 +1390,8 @@ Sorry, I jumped. So my answer is, this was not a question,
and I'm happy for you. So that's still an answer. +NOTE Q: How Zettelkasten is useful for highly mathematical STEM academic fields like computer science or engineering fields? +
Next question. How Zettelkasten is useful @@ -1432,35 +1455,35 @@ that people did over hundreds of years for you.
That's an order. But there are also many textbooks.
+00:25:39.480 --> 00:25:42.059 So opinions may vary. The presentation may vary.
+00:25:42.060 --> 00:25:43.674 Some textbooks may click with you,
+00:25:43.675 --> 00:26:04.559 while others stay opaque, and you can't get into the meat.
+00:26:04.560 --> 00:26:12.919 Sorry, I'm just typing the answer right now.
+00:26:12.920 --> 00:26:17.379 Copying information to another box is not, yeah.
+00:26:17.380 --> 00:26:19.090 Yeah, let's see what the first answer is.
+00:26:19.091 --> 00:26:21.559 Someone posted that Zettelkasten is great for mathematics,
incredible for computer science.
-With OrgBabel you can have living source code, yes, +With Org-Babel you can have living source code, yes,
-that you can execute from the node, +that you can execute from the note,
also true for a formula, @@ -1475,7 +1498,7 @@ You can even use Agda if you want to. Ah, I think I know who typed the answer.
-Hello, Oliver. If you want to have living proofs in your nodes, +Hello, Oliver. If you want to have living proofs in your notes,
even inline LaTeX is in here. That's, yeah, yeah, yeah. @@ -1490,13 +1513,13 @@ maybe your own summary. I would suggest add your own summary
-because we're looking at the etherpad, right? +because we're looking at the Etherpad, right?
-Maybe I just copy this over so you can all the either +Maybe I just copy this over so you can all...
-pets indentation is missing with what Org is doing. +The Etherpad's indentation is missing with what Org is doing.
And the answer was probably submitted by Oliver @@ -1505,40 +1528,43 @@ And the answer was probably submitted by Oliver just in case someone wants to see
-who that could have been with the Acta reference +who that could have been with the Agda reference
-because nobody uses Acta, +because nobody uses Agda,
-nobody in the world maybe so Acta is just a yeah +nobody in the world maybe. So Agda is just a, yeah,
let's say it's good for proofing the code that you type
-as you type it in the compilation set very weird +as you type it in the compilation set, very weird
-if you've never heard of this so check that out +if you've never heard of this, so check that out.
-so question was how Zettelkasten is useful for these kinds of things +So question was how Zettelkasten is useful for these kinds of things
yeah it sounds like in these kinds of fields
-that you only deal with facts +that you only deal with facts.
-that's also kind of sort of true for psychology where you have a lot of +That's also kind of sort of true for psychology where you have a lot of,
-and also law where you at least in at least in German +and also law, where you at least in German + +00:28:29.640 --> 00:28:32.011 +and our style of law where you have a lot of,
-and our style of law where you have a lot of where you have thick books of law +00:28:32.012 --> 00:28:33.759 +where you have thick books of law
and very very little records, @@ -1546,11 +1572,17 @@ and very very little records,
that's not the right phrasing,
-where you don't rely on the ruling as much as you do in, for example, the USA, +00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:44.540 +where you don't rely on the ruling + +00:28:44.541 --> 00:28:48.239 +as much as you do in, for example, the USA,
-where you need to be aware of every court ruling to then put stuff into context +00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:52.674 +where you need to be aware of every court ruling + +00:28:52.675 --> 00:28:53.919 +to then put stuff into context
and all of this is like the current how you do law. @@ -1862,13 +1894,13 @@ and you still have access to this later when you need to check your personal inventory
-of mathematical proofs so my answer would be +of mathematical proofs so my answer would be...
-let's type in my answer +Let's type in my answer
-on either pad would be I'm not able to type. +on Etherpad would be... I'm not able to type.
Sorry. My answer would be this. @@ -1972,11 +2004,11 @@ and it's not just copying the thing into a box,
like from one box into another,
+00:36:51.760 --> 00:36:54.019 from the public internet box into my own buffer,
-that's a custom that's closer to me, +00:36:54.020 --> 00:36:56.399 +that Zettelkasten that's closer to me,
like a fridge is closer to my kitchen @@ -2101,26 +2133,28 @@ Just check it out for yourself. I'm not sure.
Next question, sorry. +NOTE Q: In your experience, would you say that you re-use most of your notes? +
-In your experience, would you say that you reuse most of your nodes? +In your experience, would you say that you reuse most of your notes?
-Watching your demo, I thought that more nodes you create, +Watching your demo, I thought that more notes you create,
the less you might reuse them. Yes, that's true.
-I have 11,000 nodes or something, +I have 11,000 notes or something,
-and I don't use 11,000 nodes every day. +and I don't use 11,000 notes every day.
I can only use a fraction of them.
-But let's say you have the Feynman Darling nodes, +But let's say you have the Feynman Darling notes,
then you would probably use these. @@ -2132,7 +2166,7 @@ Imagine you have the same 12 Darlings for a year. Then you use these 12 thingies for one year more often.
-than most of your other nodes, +than most of your other notes,
because these become your entry points @@ -2167,11 +2201,11 @@ maybe these 12 Feynman darlings were your darlings
during university studies for STEM field,
+00:40:47.720 --> 00:40:49.339 where you had a hard time figuring out
-how the technical system works for your benefit. +00:40:49.340 --> 00:40:52.479 +how the Zettelkasten works for your benefit.
And then five years later, you're in a job and you don't need all of them @@ -2342,7 +2376,7 @@ where do you want to put the effort? and will it pay off? maybe if not, then maybe spend the time on something else
-like don't try to exactly customize something you hate +like don't try to Zettelkastenify something you hate
just to I don't know, @@ -2354,13 +2388,15 @@ do your due diligence if you don't want to because then you'll hate the process
-that's worse than not using nodes a lot next questions, +that's worse than not using notes a lot. Next question. + +NOTE Q: How are notes structured and accessed when the notes grow from 10K to 100K notes?
-how are nodes structured and accessed +How are notes structured and accessed
-when the nodes grow from 10k to 100k nodes? +when the notes grow from 10k to 100k notes?
yes, that's a field of exploration, @@ -2369,7 +2405,7 @@ yes, that's a field of exploration, I mean that the lower realm there I don't know anybody
-who's using a hyperlinked 100k node archive. +who's using a hyperlinked 100k note archive.
I do know people who have a lot of text files @@ -2414,10 +2450,10 @@ I'm thinking about the stuff that I'm spending time on. What about that?
-Yeah, how are nodes structured and accessed +Yeah, how are notes structured and accessed
-when the nodes go from one to 100k? +when the notes go from one to 100k?
I will imagine that it becomes a matter that's speculation. @@ -2432,7 +2468,7 @@ it's going to be self-similar, like Mandelbrot images, where you have recursive patterns.
-First, you have a couple of nodes. +First, you have a couple of notes.
You can leave through them digitally or physically easily. @@ -2456,7 +2492,7 @@ And the clue there is, Eventually, you have hundreds or maybe thousands,
-not hundreds or thousands, of structure nodes. +not hundreds or thousands, of structure notes.
And then you have the same problem @@ -2468,13 +2504,13 @@ that you had on the lower base layer. And now you will probably look for another tool.
-But there is nothing else that's not also a structure node +But there is nothing else that's not also a structure note
but is structuring other structures mostly
-instead of structuring the low-level nodes. +instead of structuring the low-level notes.
But this distinction, I want to point out, doesn't pay off. @@ -2483,25 +2519,25 @@ But this distinction, I want to point out, doesn't pay off. it seems like it doesn't pay off
-to say hey i have these foundational permanent nodes +to say hey I have these foundational permanent notes
-and then i have these meta nodes +And then I have these meta notes,
-these these maps and structures +these maps and structures
-and then i have these super mega structures +and then I have these super mega structures
-which are not permanent +which are not permanent,
-which are not structures which are not +which are not structures, which are not...
-I don't know this doesn't seem to pay off +I don't know... This doesn't seem to pay off,
because eventually there is another level and another level @@ -2626,6 +2662,8 @@ and then see how people transparently evolve
their gardens, their processes, their note-taking systems +NOTE Q: I would be very interested in your thought on this video by Westenberg - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjSWwmg-JRM (Why I Deleted My Second Brain: A Journey Back to Real Thinking) +
next question not a question but i would be very interested @@ -2633,16 +2671,16 @@ next question not a question but i would be very interested in your thoughts on this video
-by westenberg okay it's it's this is not spam +by Westenberg. Okay. This is not spam.
-i i don't uh there's joe westenberg's uh youtube channel +I don't... Uh, there's Joe Westenberg's Youtube channel,
-why i deleted my second brain +"Why I Deleted My Second Brain:
-a journey back to real thinking uh +A Journey Back to Real Thinking."
I think I didn't watch the video but read an article. @@ -2656,17 +2694,17 @@ It's not on screen sharing. That was stupid.
I'm probably not going to watch it right now with everyone here,
+00:49:48.240 --> 00:49:51.659 so my thoughts on deleting and stuff like that.
+00:49:51.660 --> 00:49:58.679 I do remember there was a very cleverly written, well-written post
and the claim was, from my perspective,
-and that's not doing the work of +and that's not doing the work of...
It's not doing the work of the author justice. @@ -2894,7 +2932,7 @@ Now we come back to one of the earlier questions, like, why do I not use outlines?
-Because OrgNode allows me to do outlines. +Because Org-node allows me to do outlines.
Well, I try to write my notes as blog posts, @@ -3013,14 +3051,14 @@ maybe maybe they tried to do too much with a different mindset
and it just didn't click and then they,
+00:56:24.840 --> 00:56:25.519 you know next question is there a danger?
+00:56:25.520 --> 00:56:34.340 also, wait a second, answer do not probably a lot of collection,
-not a lot of stinking in the Zettelkasten to some purpose. +00:56:34.341 --> 00:56:52.359 +not a lot of thinking in the Zettelkasten to some purpose.
Usually. Conflation was the word I was fishing for. @@ -3028,14 +3066,14 @@ Usually. Conflation was the word I was fishing for.
Usually posts videos like this.
-Conflate note taking as a dumping ground +00:57:02.841 --> 00:57:15.049 +Conflate note taking as a dumping ground for stuff
-for stuff with something that is valuable in the long term. +00:57:15.050 --> 00:57:22.174 +with something that is valuable in the long term.
-Also if this was our dear friend Westenberg +Also, if this was our dear friend Westenberg
I think the note count also was higher, @@ -3070,8 +3108,10 @@ you really want to solve in the long term.
So next question. +NOTE Q: Is there a danger that with the Zettelkasten process, that the process gets a bit in the way of the content? +
-Is there a danger that with the settled custom process, +Is there a danger that with the Zettelkasten process,
that the process gets a bit in the way of the content? @@ -3134,7 +3174,7 @@ having a title, hashtags, and content, and also being very, very careful about quoting my sources.
-I don't do much with my et cetera. +I don't do much with my Zettelkasten.
I cannot give up quoting my sources @@ -3148,56 +3188,56 @@ forgetting where I get ideas from and confuse.
And I get out because I'm aware of the problem there.
+00:59:44.600 --> 00:59:49.439 I'm also not trusting my own notes anymore.
-would not be trusting my own notes anymore +00:59:49.440 --> 00:59:51.159 +I would not be trusting my own notes anymore.
-i need to properly cite so then i can see hey +I need to properly cite so then I can see, hey,
-this block has no quotations that's mine +this block has no quotations, that's mine,
-and i can trust this it's not like hey this is maybe mine +and I can trust this. It's not like, hey, this is maybe mine,
-maybe this is a verbatim quote from a book like this +maybe this is a verbatim quote from a book. Like this
-is not helping that's a ceremony +is not helping. That's a ceremony
-that's paying off in the long term also +that's paying off in the long term also,
-so that when you write something +so that when you write something,
-you have all the sources at hand +you have all the sources at hand.
-that's a useful ceremony title +01:00:15.160 --> 01:00:16.882 +That's a useful ceremony.
-is just a way of summarizing the content +01:00:16.883 --> 01:00:20.799 +Title is just a way of summarizing the content.
-do it like an excerpt, right? +Do it like an excerpt, right?
-you have the whole content, that's your etc. +You have the whole content, that's your Zettel.
-do a short summary, that may be your introduction. +Do a short summary, that may be your introduction.
So have a way to quickly get a glimpse of the relevance
-before having to read the whole settle +before having to read the whole Zettel
when you encounter it years from now. @@ -3212,7 +3252,7 @@ and then have an even more condensed form that's a title. The title is basically your API,
-the interface for you and your nodes. +the interface for you and your notes.
And it needs to uphold some kind of contract. @@ -3253,14 +3293,14 @@ titles don't always stay consistent or constant
that's why I don't link by title, because I would then need
-to go through my node archive and also need to go to +01:01:31.080 --> 01:01:39.299 +to go through my note archive and also need to go to
-my node archive and need to correct all the links +01:01:39.300 --> 01:01:41.090 +my note archive and need to correct all the links.
-that's a janitorial task I like to not do, if I can +01:01:41.091 --> 01:01:44.039 +That's a janitorial task I like to not do, if I can.
So answer here, less ceremony, fewer ceremonies, plural. @@ -3269,7 +3309,7 @@ So answer here, less ceremony, fewer ceremonies, plural. Try to only do the minimum possible, minimum viable thing.
-And using Emacs and D-Node, you get a lot of defaults. +And using Emacs and Denote, you get a lot of defaults.
And then you need to worry @@ -3314,10 +3354,10 @@ in the search results all the time. That's not as useful as having a pathway
-through your nodes that you can follow. +through your notes that you can follow.
-It may not be a pathway through all of your nodes, of course, +It may not be a pathway through all of your notes, of course,
but it may be a pathway from entry point into some topic. @@ -3343,8 +3383,10 @@ more or less, and then you're good.
I hope. Wishing you all the best. Next and last question. +NOTE Q: How do you navigate looking at all posts with certain tags +
-How do you navigate looking at all posts with a certain text? +How do you navigate looking at all posts with certain tags?
This might be an emacs, already new to emacs. @@ -3352,23 +3394,23 @@ This might be an emacs, already new to emacs.
I just may have answered this.
-How do you navigate looking at all posts with a certain text? +01:03:28.680 --> 01:03:31.799 +How do you navigate looking at all posts with certain tags?
-Let me go to my actual node archive. +01:03:31.800 --> 01:03:43.215 +Let me go to my actual note archive,
-and then php no language learning ah +01:03:43.216 --> 01:03:55.919 +and then php, no, language learning, ah,
-this is not my setup I'm very clumsy +this is not a nice setup. I'm very clumsy.
-I'm sorry, I don't know swift language learning +I'm sorry, I don't know, swift, language learning,
-ah that's that's a boring one php By this time, I could have also, +ah that's a boring one, php. By this time, I could have also,
ah, there's the model. This would be an entry point @@ -3512,7 +3554,7 @@ Why do I show this when the question is about tags? Because if I search for... Which one do I take?
-Let's try grep. php. Yep, grep exited the anomaly. +Let's try grep. php. Yep, grep exited abnormally.
Dang, why? Option requires an argument. @@ -3611,7 +3653,7 @@ And the hashtag-based search would be I don't know what I'm looking for. It was PHP related. I hope I use the hashtag correctly
-and then kill all these nodes from my archive. +and then kill all these notes from my archive.
The metaphor doesn't work that way, @@ -3620,7 +3662,7 @@ The metaphor doesn't work that way, but still you get a lot of results here
-and you could use this as a way to filter from 11,000 nodes +and you could use this as a way to filter from 11,000 notes
down to 50 or so, maybe less. @@ -3629,10 +3671,10 @@ down to 50 or so, maybe less. And if you got this far, then you can start to do it in a mechanical way again.
-But wait, if you have 100 or 1000 nodes in the results there, +But wait, if you have 100 or 1000 notes in the results there,
-then you can't mechanically go through all the nodes again. +then you can't mechanically go through all the notes again.
You can maybe skim and look @@ -3713,7 +3755,7 @@ but they're also not closely interrelated, you will have read five to 10 different sources that you could process.
-You could maybe then also create an overview node +You could maybe then also create an overview note
as a preparation for the seminar @@ -3725,7 +3767,7 @@ whatever happens at university. Then the hashtag becomes just a way to group things.
-But once you create the structure node, +But once you create the structure note,
you don't need the hashtags to navigate anymore. @@ -3910,17 +3952,17 @@ I think these are all the questions.
I'm going to delete the leftover ones.
+01:15:47.160 --> 01:15:54.719 I hope you enjoyed some of the answers.
+01:15:54.720 --> 01:16:01.174 Thank you so much. Thank you. That's a lot.
-We'll go back and get everything transcribed as well +01:16:01.175 --> 01:16:04.674 +We'll go back and get everything transcribed as well,
-and then you can turn that into other articles in the future +01:16:04.675 --> 01:16:08.599 +and then you can turn that into other articles in the future,
because that's how this all works, right? @@ -3941,7 +3983,7 @@ It's only useful to transfer language before writing, but now you can just read.
-We have two people in the big blue button room +We have two people in the Big Blue Button room
who are still around, but I think they've got their, like, @@ -3953,7 +3995,7 @@ they don't have microphones set up. So I don't know if you want to just, like, CryptKNFL,
-if you want to just follow up through the etherpad, +if you want to just follow up through the Etherpadmp,
or email, I guess, in case you have further questions. -- cgit v1.2.3