diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | 2023/organizers-notebook.md | 39 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 2023/organizers-notebook/index.org | 35 |
2 files changed, 34 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/2023/organizers-notebook.md b/2023/organizers-notebook.md index 4e6499cc..7cc0dac8 100644 --- a/2023/organizers-notebook.md +++ b/2023/organizers-notebook.md @@ -569,16 +569,15 @@ Compared to [two-track schedule](#draft-schedule): What if we have three tracks instead? -Three-track advantages: -- More space between talks for streaming the Q&A -- Easier to explain the schedule -- More logical grouping -- Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe - -Three-track disadvantages: -- Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad) -- Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS) -- More fear of missing out for participants +- Three-track advantages: + - More space between talks for streaming the Q&A + - Easier to explain the schedule + - More logical grouping + - Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe +- Three-track disadvantages: + - Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad) + - Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS) + - More fear of missing out for participants (defun emacsconf-schedule-copy-previous-track (list) (cl-loop @@ -671,15 +670,13 @@ verify speaker name pronunciations at that time. #### TODO Do we want to use honorifics like Dr.? :decision: -Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the -speaker-submitted intros: -- Equality - -Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro: -- Observes personal preferences - -Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros: -- Recognizes credentials +- OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the + speaker-submitted intros: + - Equality +- OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro: + - Observes personal preferences +- OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros: + - Recognizes credentials ### BLOCKED Record intro videos with 1-2 sentence intros for all the talks @@ -695,7 +692,7 @@ Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros: AM: 9-12 PM EST, PM: 1-5 PM EST (plus a little extra for setup/transition) Saturday Dec 2 2023 -<table id="org8fc9488"> +<table id="org02d79d3"> <colgroup> @@ -768,7 +765,7 @@ Saturday Dec 2 2023 </table> Sunday Dec 3 2023 -<table id="org3b09041"> +<table id="orgd875ee4"> <colgroup> diff --git a/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org b/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org index 05475421..0577b339 100644 --- a/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org +++ b/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org @@ -616,16 +616,15 @@ Compared to [[#draft-schedule][two-track schedule]]: What if we have three tracks instead? -Three-track advantages: -- More space between talks for streaming the Q&A -- Easier to explain the schedule -- More logical grouping -- Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe - -Three-track disadvantages: -- Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad) -- Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS) -- More fear of missing out for participants +- Three-track advantages: + - More space between talks for streaming the Q&A + - Easier to explain the schedule + - More logical grouping + - Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe +- Three-track disadvantages: + - Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad) + - Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS) + - More fear of missing out for participants #+begin_src emacs-lisp (defun emacsconf-schedule-copy-previous-track (list) @@ -847,15 +846,13 @@ verify speaker name pronunciations at that time. :CUSTOM_ID: honorifics :END: -Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the -speaker-submitted intros: -- Equality - -Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro: -- Observes personal preferences - -Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros: -- Recognizes credentials +- OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the + speaker-submitted intros: + - Equality +- OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro: + - Observes personal preferences +- OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros: + - Recognizes credentials *** BLOCKED Record intro videos with 1-2 sentence intros for all the talks :PROPERTIES: |