format lists

2 files changed, 34 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/2023/organizers-notebook.md b/2023/organizers-notebook.md
index 4e6499cc..7cc0dac8 100644
--- a/2023/organizers-notebook.md
+++ b/2023/organizers-notebook.md
@@ -569,16 +569,15 @@ Compared to [two-track schedule](#draft-schedule):
 
 What if we have three tracks instead?
 
-Three-track advantages:
--   More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
--   Easier to explain the schedule
--   More logical grouping
--   Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe
-
-Three-track disadvantages:
--   Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
--   Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS)
--   More fear of missing out for participants
+-   Three-track advantages:
+    -   More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
+    -   Easier to explain the schedule
+    -   More logical grouping
+    -   Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe
+-   Three-track disadvantages:
+    -   Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
+    -   Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS)
+    -   More fear of missing out for participants
 
     (defun emacsconf-schedule-copy-previous-track (list)
     	(cl-loop
@@ -671,15 +670,13 @@ verify speaker name pronunciations at that time.
 
 #### TODO Do we want to use honorifics like Dr.?     :decision:
 
-Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the
-speaker-submitted intros:
--   Equality
-
-Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro:
--   Observes personal preferences
-
-Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
--   Recognizes credentials
+-   OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the
+    speaker-submitted intros:
+    -   Equality
+-   OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro:
+    -   Observes personal preferences
+-   OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
+    -   Recognizes credentials
 
 ### BLOCKED Record intro videos with 1-2 sentence intros for all the talks
 
@@ -695,7 +692,7 @@ Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
 AM: 9-12 PM EST, PM: 1-5 PM EST (plus a little extra for setup/transition)
 
 Saturday Dec 2 2023
-<table id="org8fc9488">
+<table id="org02d79d3">
 
 
 <colgroup>
@@ -768,7 +765,7 @@ Saturday Dec 2 2023
 </table>
 
 Sunday Dec 3 2023
-<table id="org3b09041">
+<table id="orgd875ee4">
 
 
 <colgroup>
diff --git a/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org b/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org
index 05475421..0577b339 100644
--- a/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org
+++ b/2023/organizers-notebook/index.org
@@ -616,16 +616,15 @@ Compared to [[#draft-schedule][two-track schedule]]:
 
 What if we have three tracks instead?
 
-Three-track advantages:
-- More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
-- Easier to explain the schedule
-- More logical grouping
-- Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe
-         
-Three-track disadvantages:
-- Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
-- Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS)
-- More fear of missing out for participants
+- Three-track advantages:
+  - More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
+  - Easier to explain the schedule
+  - More logical grouping
+  - Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe         
+- Three-track disadvantages:
+  - Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
+  - Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node for VNC+OBS)
+  - More fear of missing out for participants
 
 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
 (defun emacsconf-schedule-copy-previous-track (list)
@@ -847,15 +846,13 @@ verify speaker name pronunciations at that time.
 :CUSTOM_ID: honorifics
 :END:
 
-Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the
-speaker-submitted intros:
-- Equality
-
-Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro:
-- Observes personal preferences
-
-Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
-- Recognizes credentials
+- OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in the
+  speaker-submitted intros:
+  - Equality
+- OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their intro:
+  - Observes personal preferences
+- OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
+  - Recognizes credentials
 
 *** BLOCKED Record intro videos with 1-2 sentence intros for all the talks
 :PROPERTIES: