diff options
Diffstat (limited to '2021/talks/build.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2021/talks/build.md | 23 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/2021/talks/build.md b/2021/talks/build.md index 7ec0da46..c8edc0d8 100644 --- a/2021/talks/build.md +++ b/2021/talks/build.md @@ -8,10 +8,16 @@ # How to build an Emacs Fermin MF - - [[!inline pages="internal(2021/info/build-schedule)" raw="yes"]] +[[!template id="help" +summary="main talk does not have captions" +volunteer="João Pedro" +tags="help_with_main_captions" +message="""This talk does not have captions yet. Would you like to help [caption this talk](/2021/contribute/#edit-captions)? You may be able to start with these +[autogenerated captions](https://media.emacsconf.org/2021/emacsconf-2021-build--how-to-build-an-emacs--fermin-mf--main.vtt) +and [timing information](https://media.emacsconf.org/2021/emacsconf-2021-build--how-to-build-an-emacs--fermin-mf.en.srv2)."""]] + This is a deep dive in the Emacs philosophical and technical aspect on what makes our beloved GNU Emacs what it it. It's also a talk about the early LISP machines and @@ -30,6 +36,19 @@ For more details about CEDAR: <https://gitlab.com/sasanidas/cedar> # Discussion +Pad: + +- Q1: Which level of compatibility with GNU Emacs do you want to achieve? + - A: I want to achieve 100% compatibility (when possible) +- Q2: Are you then planning to reimplment all Emacs C primitives? + - A:No, the underlayer would be different +- Q3: Do you plan on doing something to ease interaction between redundant "components" in both Elisp and Common Lisp (like CLOS and EIEIO)? How about semantic differences between both? + - A: (Probably answered by voice.) +- Q4: Have you used Nyxt, which is Emacs-like and written in Common Lisp? If so, what did you think about it? + - A: I think it's a great project and I would like to use it as a my main Browse (with the firefox extension layer) +- Q5: "Emacs is a great operating system, just lacking a good editor." How do you feel about the push to use Emacs as a full computing interface, and do you think Cedar could thrive in some of the fully common lisp system ideas that might catch on (like Robert Strandh's proposed CLOSOS)? + - A: I think CEDAR can achieve more integration with the OS (the same as the CL implementations) but I think the goal of been a good Emacs is good enought + IRC nick: akrl - I think the performance stuff is mostly orthogonal to elisp. ex. very large files or files with really long lines grind horribly. |