Let's try it with individual info pages that are included

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/2020/info/07.md b/2020/info/07.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4b3683ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2020/info/07.md
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+A practiced dexterity with the arcane incantations known as keybindings is
+the true mark of the veteran Emacs user. Yet, it takes years to get there,
+and if you tried to explain what you were doing there, nobody would
+understand, least of all those Vim users who would say that the whole
+enterprise was foolhardy to begin with. They don't get it, those fools. Let
+them flounder about in their "normal mode." Normal isn't good enough for
+me! I want exceptional, IDEAL, I want… glorious mode, that's what I want.
+And the only thing that'll cut it is if I do it … my way. Why, with my
+precious emacs.d, I'm invincible! Well… just between you and me, there
+are times when learning new keybindings every time someone makes a new toy
+gets to be a bit of a drag, and some days I can't keep my C-c's and my C-c
+C-c's straight if I'm being honest with you, but you'll never catch me
+admitting it! I do wonder if there's a better way to get to glorious mode,
+even though my .emacs.d is already perfect (of course).
+
+If this secretly sounds like you, then rejoice, there just might be a new
+way, a better way! And you could potentially get there in days instead of
+years, so that even your script kiddie coworker with their "VSCode" (groan)
+may at last come around to your way of looking at things, and, maybe, just
+maybe, even those Vim users (hiss!)!
+
+"Epistemic" Emacs is a user interface paradigm based on treating aspects of
+the user interface as conceptual entities that can be reasoned about in
+terms of a standard language. Essentially, instead of learning keybindings
+for each specific action, you learn keybindings for general, conceptual
+habits, kind of like Vim, except that instead of reasoning only about text,
+you reason about any aspect of your interaction with the machine, whether
+it's windows or buffers or even those interactions themselves. The promise
+of this approach is that you just learn a simple language once, and you can
+then apply it to vastly different aspects of your user interface, with the
+same keybindings doing different things in different contexts, in sensible
+and predictable ways. And in principle, whenever that new toy technology
+comes around, anyone could extend the UI language to apply to it in a
+matter of minutes, and you'd already know how to use it.
+