1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
<!-- organizers-notebook.md is exported from organizers-notebook/index.org, please modify that instead. -->
[[!sidebar content=""]]
This file is automatically exported from [/organizers-notebook/index.org](/organizers-notebook/index.org). You might prefer to navigate this as an Org file instead. To do so, [clone the wiki repository](https://emacsconf.org/edit/).
This document is the general organizers' notebook that can be used as a starting point each year. For specific years, see:
- [2024](/2024/organizers-notebook)
- [2023](/2023/organizers-notebook)
- [2022](/2022/organizers-notebook)
- [2021](/2021/organizers-notebook)
- [2020](/2020/organizers-notebook)
- [2019](/2019/organizers-notebook)
# Table of Contents
- [Starting up the conference planning process](#starting-up-the-conference-planning-process)
- [Create the private repository](#starting-up-the-conference-planning-process-create-the-private-repository)
- [Create the public organizers’ notebook in the wiki](#starting-up-the-conference-planning-process-create-the-public-organizers-notebook-in-the-wiki)
- [Phases and lessons learned](#phases-and-lessons-learned)
- [Draft CFP](#phases-and-lessons-learned-draft-cfp)
<a id="starting-up-the-conference-planning-process"></a>
# Starting up the conference planning process
Check in with core organizers from the previous year to see who’s in.
<a id="starting-up-the-conference-planning-process-create-the-private-repository"></a>
## Create the private repository
This repository will store submissions, contact information, etc.
1. Create the repository on `front0`. Ex:
sudo su - git
cd repositories
mkdir emacsconf-2024-private.git
cd emacsconf-2024-private.git
git init --bare
2. Edit `gitolite-admin/config/gitolite-conf`. Add lines for the group and the repo. Commit and push. Ex:
@emacsconf-2024-org = bandali sachac ...
repo emacsconf-2024-private
RW+ = @admins @emacsconf-2024-org orga
3. Clone the private repository into the appropriate location. `git clone git@git.emacsconf.org:emacsconf-2024-private private`
<a id="starting-up-the-conference-planning-process-create-the-public-organizers-notebook-in-the-wiki"></a>
## Create the public organizers’ notebook in the wiki
Ex: 2024/organizers-notebook/index.org
<a id="phases-and-lessons-learned"></a>
# Phases and lessons learned
<a id="phases-and-lessons-learned-draft-cfp"></a>
## Draft CFP
Create linked pages
- [ ] year index
- [ ] volunteer page
- [ ] submit page
### How to mark pages as drafts
Put inside double square brackets: `!template id=pagedraft`
### Previous years
[2023](file:///home/sacha/proj/emacsconf/wiki/2023/cfp.md)
### Lessons learned
- Maybe incentivize proper timezone specification by saying we can translate times to their local time?
- Make sure to include cfp.org as an attachment instead of inline
- bandali likes having the commitment to freedom section in the CFP as a form of activism.
- Ask for public e-mail or contact information, IRC handle in CFP.
- Nudge everyone towards 5/10 or 20 minutes, and consider < or > on a case-by-case basis.
- In previous years, we offered 40 minutes as a
regular choice, but that was difficult because
we had to figure out how to squeeze lots of
talks into the schedule and we didn’t know
what could be shortened. In 2022, we asked
people to provide quick outlines for 10-, 20-,
and 40-minute formats if they wanted a long
talk slot, which was helpful in prioritizing.
In 2023, we just suggested 5/10 and 20-minute
slots knowing that there would probably be
plenty of time for Q&A, with some longer talks
approved on a case-by-case basis. Because
talks are (ideally) prerecorded, 20 minutes
seems to be a good length to get into
something interesting while leaving time for
Q&A so that people could dive deeper into
particular things that interested them.
- Rolling acceptances were very nice. We gave
people a week to respond, which felt a little
quick sometimes, but gave people enough time to
speak up to see if they had any red flags or
suggestions.
- We didn’t extend the CFP period in 2023, great!
- Two streams worked out well. Sunday morning had network congestion issues, so keep an eye out for those.
- It’s easier for us to extend beyond 5pm than to go before 9am
(especially for Pacific time). Extending beyond 5pm puts strain on
European organizers and volunteers, though.
|
