blob: 32d90f1e0d11f050934fa88977953ef6c7054456 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
|
WEBVTT
00:00:01.280 --> 00:00:28.079
Introduction and conclusion
00:00:28.080 --> 00:01:07.199
Who am I?
00:01:07.200 --> 00:02:26.958
Is Emacs unpopular?
00:02:26.959 --> 00:04:15.679
What does popularity really mean?
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:32.399
How do we measure popularity?
00:04:32.400 --> 00:06:18.318
Google Trends
00:06:18.319 --> 00:08:19.999
Stack Overflow Survey
00:08:20.000 --> 00:10:23.199
Community Activity
00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:38.319
How do editors lose popularity?
00:10:38.320 --> 00:12:25.679
A new editor with better features appears
00:12:25.680 --> 00:14:01.039
Lack of sufficient maintenance
00:14:01.040 --> 00:14:36.958
The "fashion" moves on
00:14:36.959 --> 00:17:10.239
What happens when an editor loses popularity?
00:17:10.240 --> 00:17:20.159
How will Emacs survive *despite* popularity?
00:17:20.160 --> 00:19:51.439
Emacs is more deeply hackable than almost all other editors
00:19:51.440 --> 00:21:15.279
Emacs has a strong community of highly skilled package authors
00:21:15.280 --> 00:22:33.439
Emacs has a very strong user community
00:22:33.440 --> 00:23:40.959
The Emacs maintainers and contributors care about the users
00:23:40.960 --> 00:24:22.879
Isn't all this supposed to come when an editor is popular?
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:23.880
When someone talks about popularity...
|
