1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
|
0:00:00.080,0:00:03.520
for the list of questions in whatever
0:00:01.680,0:00:06.160
order you like
0:00:03.520,0:00:08.000
okay so i see what package is used um
0:00:06.160,0:00:10.400
probably cemex mode
0:00:08.000,0:00:11.360
um right so the main package that was
0:00:10.400,0:00:14.480
being demoed
0:00:11.360,0:00:16.720
um that is not yet on melpa in fact i
0:00:14.480,0:00:19.359
haven't even decided on a name for it
0:00:16.720,0:00:22.080
um i've alternately alternately called
0:00:19.359,0:00:26.000
it epistemic mode i've called it
0:00:22.080,0:00:28.560
um england i called it uh
0:00:26.000,0:00:30.240
all kinds of things but at the moment
0:00:28.560,0:00:31.439
you can find it on my github there's a
0:00:30.240,0:00:32.960
link
0:00:31.439,0:00:35.600
in the presentation itself if you go to
0:00:32.960,0:00:38.879
github slash account about
0:00:35.600,0:00:39.840
um the package there it's currently
0:00:38.879,0:00:42.879
named indra
0:00:39.840,0:00:46.800
i'm not sure um
0:00:42.879,0:00:49.920
packages actually yes the second one is
0:00:46.800,0:00:53.280
red that was the name that i selected um
0:00:49.920,0:00:53.920
last night um and that's because it
0:00:53.280,0:00:55.760
might that
0:00:53.920,0:00:57.520
there's a concept in tibetan buddhism
0:00:55.760,0:00:58.480
that seems like it might have something
0:00:57.520,0:00:59.840
to do with
0:00:58.480,0:01:01.600
the kinds of concepts we're talking
0:00:59.840,0:01:04.000
about with this package so i just
0:01:01.600,0:01:05.760
thought it would be a good name for it
0:01:04.000,0:01:09.920
so you can look up that concept
0:01:05.760,0:01:13.119
and get a sense of it on wikipedia
0:01:09.920,0:01:15.759
next question is how to deal with dwarak
0:01:13.119,0:01:16.960
dwarjak or however that's pronounced
0:01:15.759,0:01:20.400
this is always bug me
0:01:16.960,0:01:22.400
is there an x-mod map mode so the thing
0:01:20.400,0:01:23.360
with this is it's kind of surprising but
0:01:22.400,0:01:26.000
although vim
0:01:23.360,0:01:27.200
was originally developed um you know
0:01:26.000,0:01:29.520
with the idea of
0:01:27.200,0:01:32.000
the key bindings being on the home rule
0:01:29.520,0:01:33.119
it turns out that that is actually not a
0:01:32.000,0:01:36.400
major aspect
0:01:33.119,0:01:38.560
of the vim editing experience so
0:01:36.400,0:01:40.720
people who use the dvorak layout
0:01:38.560,0:01:42.640
actually end up using the same keys as
0:01:40.720,0:01:44.720
they do on the normal qwerty layout so
0:01:42.640,0:01:48.159
they don't remap anything
0:01:44.720,0:01:51.040
because the uh the the sort of
0:01:48.159,0:01:52.240
the power that vim or the the
0:01:51.040,0:01:55.600
flexibility the
0:01:52.240,0:01:56.880
spiral that bim enables on qwerty layout
0:01:55.600,0:01:58.719
keyboards is exactly
0:01:56.880,0:01:59.920
preserved even on a door jack keyboard
0:01:58.719,0:02:01.920
even though you your
0:01:59.920,0:02:04.399
fingers are not in the same positions
0:02:01.920,0:02:09.119
it's not a big deal actually
0:02:04.399,0:02:10.879
um and then i mostly use default model
0:02:09.119,0:02:12.319
provided by vanilla emacs and work and
0:02:10.879,0:02:13.840
org mode for text editing can you give
0:02:12.319,0:02:15.920
me some examples
0:02:13.840,0:02:17.280
of how the user can use the concept of
0:02:15.920,0:02:20.840
mode mode
0:02:17.280,0:02:24.640
to do some interesting
0:02:20.840,0:02:25.120
um so probably the main thing would be
0:02:24.640,0:02:27.920
the
0:02:25.120,0:02:28.959
the keystrokes would be less uh
0:02:27.920,0:02:32.080
contrived
0:02:28.959,0:02:36.560
so they the the fewer modes you have
0:02:32.080,0:02:39.840
the more modifiers you need
0:02:36.560,0:02:41.280
in order to um do whatever it is that
0:02:39.840,0:02:44.800
you're trying to do because you've got
0:02:41.280,0:02:47.840
essentially with a max model you've got
0:02:44.800,0:02:47.840
a completely flat
0:02:48.080,0:02:52.160
keyboard structure and so all of the
0:02:50.959,0:02:55.680
different things that you might
0:02:52.160,0:02:58.720
want to express are all mapped to a flat
0:02:55.680,0:03:02.840
keyboard uh set of keys
0:02:58.720,0:03:06.400
so with um with this kind of
0:03:02.840,0:03:09.200
modal structure the more modes you have
0:03:06.400,0:03:10.400
the more the individual keystrokes
0:03:09.200,0:03:13.200
become
0:03:10.400,0:03:14.959
shorter and shorter so that could be one
0:03:13.200,0:03:17.519
benefit that would be provided
0:03:14.959,0:03:18.000
with many modes your keystrokes would
0:03:17.519,0:03:20.080
generally
0:03:18.000,0:03:22.080
be a single keystroke long for even
0:03:20.080,0:03:24.159
relatively complex tasks
0:03:22.080,0:03:25.440
because you're setting the context
0:03:24.159,0:03:27.200
beforehand
0:03:25.440,0:03:30.840
so you already say oh i'm going to be
0:03:27.200,0:03:33.440
talking about this org buffer
0:03:30.840,0:03:36.319
agenda and then
0:03:33.440,0:03:39.599
um the all the keystrokes that you do at
0:03:36.319,0:03:42.159
that point would be in relation to that
0:03:39.599,0:03:44.080
um okay i think we have time for like
0:03:42.159,0:03:46.879
one more short question
0:03:44.080,0:03:48.879
one more short question okay let's see
0:03:46.879,0:03:50.400
how do new modes come into existence you
0:03:48.879,0:03:53.040
can make them yourself
0:03:50.400,0:03:53.760
um and you can specify them in emacs
0:03:53.040,0:03:56.159
lisp
0:03:53.760,0:03:59.040
if you like but there's also simple you
0:03:56.159,0:04:02.720
can also do it visually as we did
0:03:59.040,0:04:04.799
um but the yeah defining them
0:04:02.720,0:04:07.519
is essentially built on top of hydra but
0:04:04.799,0:04:09.120
it could also be built on top of evil or
0:04:07.519,0:04:12.400
any other modal interface provider
0:04:09.120,0:04:12.400
there's an abstraction layer
0:04:12.840,0:04:17.919
okay thank you so much for your talk and
0:04:15.920,0:04:21.440
for the live q a
0:04:17.919,0:04:22.880
sure thank you yes feel free to um take
0:04:21.440,0:04:23.759
up the rest of the questions either via
0:04:22.880,0:04:25.680
irc or
0:04:23.759,0:04:26.960
on the pad on on your own time off the
0:04:25.680,0:04:28.639
stream
0:04:26.960,0:04:30.000
perfect yeah i'll go ahead and put in
0:04:28.639,0:04:32.240
some answers there
0:04:30.000,0:04:33.120
awesome thank you all right thank you
0:04:32.240,0:04:36.880
have a good one
0:04:33.120,0:04:36.880
thanks you too
|
