diff options
Diffstat (limited to '2026/talks/llms.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2026/talks/llms.md | 12 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/2026/talks/llms.md b/2026/talks/llms.md index 61dc86f8..28b0038c 100644 --- a/2026/talks/llms.md +++ b/2026/talks/llms.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ <!-- You can manually edit this file to update the abstract, add links, etc. ---> -# [Panel] Emacs, LLMs, and Free Software: Access, Agency, and Accountability +# [Panel] Emacs, LLMs, and Free Software Participants: @@ -45,12 +45,13 @@ Questions: 1. If you were to imagine an ideal AI software you would use with Emacs, how would it look like? How would it **not** look like? What freedoms it would need to have? Feel free to answer anything, not - limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. + limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. If your answer is + that no such software should exist, that is a valid answer. 2. What is the most useful application of LLMs with Emacs for you personally? If you are not using LLMs, imagine that there is an - ideal AI or complex automation software you would be willing to use - and come up with such application. + ideal AI or complex automation software (non-AI) you would be + willing to use and come up with such application. 3. What is the most critical use case in your Emacs workflows where you would **avoid** using AI? @@ -67,6 +68,9 @@ Questions: support (for newcomers or otherwise) around LLMs/AI in the next year? And one thing it should decline to do? +**Note that you can ask other questions not limited to the above +during public Q&A session after the panel discussion** + Related: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacsconf-org/2026-08/msg00007.html> |
