diff options
Diffstat (limited to '2023/talks/scheme.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2023/talks/scheme.md | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/2023/talks/scheme.md b/2023/talks/scheme.md index a087d0ce..011d52b1 100644 --- a/2023/talks/scheme.md +++ b/2023/talks/scheme.md @@ -41,28 +41,28 @@ Author of Guix Home, maintainer of [rde](https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde), FOSS dev - Q: How much do you use these repels remotely ex using a server or desktop from your laptop? - - A: I don\'t use it remotely at the moment, but it should work + - A: I don't use it remotely at the moment, but it should work perfectly fine (except maybe lookup and other similiar functions). I also want to add a shepherd service for ares-rs, so you can connect to GNU Shepherd and systems based on it (like GNU Guix) from you emacs process and interact fluently with guile code. - Q: Can this be integrated with eglot? - - A: I\'m not sure how this integration could look like. - Theoretically, it\'s possible to expose many of ares-rs + - A: I'm not sure how this integration could look like. + Theoretically, it's possible to expose many of ares-rs functions via LSP custom actions (or whatever it called). Anyway, contact me on IRC or <https://trop.in/contact> to discuss it in more details if you have something in mind. - Q: How hard is it to add support for something else than Guile? Does it make sense to contribute at this early stage of development? - I\'ve written several packages for CHICKEN Scheme before and would + I've written several packages for CHICKEN Scheme before and would like to try this one. - - A: It\'s a matter of implementing the whole chicken-ares-rs :) + - A: It's a matter of implementing the whole chicken-ares-rs :) Many of the code can be reused, but not all, unfortunately. - emacs-arei doesn\'t need any (or almost any) changes. + emacs-arei doesn't need any (or almost any) changes. - Q: (One day late sorry) Is nREPL more extensible than what SLIME/SLY - use in Common Lisp world (I think it\'s comint.el) ? - - A: Yes, it\'s. I was evaluating and considering SWANK protocol, + use in Common Lisp world (I think it's comint.el) ? + - A: Yes, it's. I was evaluating and considering SWANK protocol, but found nREPL to be more suitable and future proof. <https://github.com/astine/swank-client/blob/master/swank-description.markdown> |