summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/2023/talks/nabokov.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '2023/talks/nabokov.md')
-rw-r--r--2023/talks/nabokov.md125
1 files changed, 125 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2023/talks/nabokov.md b/2023/talks/nabokov.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b5b346fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2023/talks/nabokov.md
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+[[!meta title="Why Nabokov would use Org-Mode if he were writing today"]]
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2023 Edmund Jorgensen"]]
+[[!inline pages="internal(2023/info/nabokov-nav)" raw="yes"]]
+
+<!-- Initially generated with emacsconf-publish-talk-page and then left alone for manual editing -->
+<!-- You can manually edit this file to update the abstract, add links, etc. --->
+
+
+# Why Nabokov would use Org-Mode if he were writing today
+Edmund Jorgensen (he/him) - <https://tomheon.com>, <mailto:ewj@inkwellandoften.com>
+
+[[!inline pages="internal(2023/info/nabokov-before)" raw="yes"]]
+
+I've written several novels in Emacs. One of them grew into a monster with a
+baker's dozen twisty, interconnected subplots.
+
+When I started to revise that novel, I had to use an outline to keep all the
+subplots straight, but I found it nearly impossible to keep that external
+outline consistent with the prose.
+
+Finally I landed on a workflow using org-mode to keep the outline and the
+prose together, which significantly reduced the burden of keeping the two
+consistent as I moved and modified sections. I also found a way to use tags
+and sparse views over them to enable quick read-throughs of subsets of the
+book for continuity checks (which I plan to demo).
+
+Later--long after finishing the book--I realized this process was essentially
+the Emacs update to the writing process that Nabokov used: he wrote on index
+cards that served as both prose and outline, so that he could move them around
+(which he did incessantly).
+
+There's something deeply beautiful about org-mode's refusal to treat structure
+and prose as different things in a piece of writing--something I think Nabokov
+would have appreciated, and something I definitely appreciate, because it
+saved my novel.
+
+About the speaker:
+
+I'm Edmund Jorgensen, a software engineer by day and a writer by night, using
+Emacs for both. When one of my novels threatened to collapse under the weight
+of its own subplots, org-mode's powerful blending of structure and prose
+rescued it. I'd like to show you how that worked, and how much of org-mode's
+power for writing comes from its similarity to Nabokov's famous
+index-card-based writing process.
+# Discussion
+
+## Notes
+
+- It looks like the Zettelkasten slipbox for nabokov
+- James Howell also like the idea using small slide to convey single
+ idea to the reader. In emacs, we have `narrow` function. Yes! I
+ use various narrow functions to present text with Emacs. (I use
+ narrow a bunch when editing, it really helps focus on a chapter or
+ scene)
+ - The funny thing about narrow functions, I mean the first time I
+ saw it in the manual, there is a warning to the new user.  That
+ would be afraid of this kind of functionality, and you have to
+ be careful, haha...
+ - I saw that warning too and avoided narrow for a long time as a
+ result!  But it's not really that bad...
+ - Exactly, I use narrow a lot, you know, every time I'm
+ working on any single type of writing or writing a code or
+ writing a piece of manuscript. It's really helped me to
+ narrow down my attention and to kind of release any other
+ thoughts that is not directly connected to the current
+ things I'm working on. And that really is an underestimated
+ functionality for the Emacs.
+- The most valuable thing that Org will bring to the writer is the
+ structure, how we can navigate between different structures of
+ thoughts.
+- The idea is using tag to narrow down a single person's timeline in
+ the whole context of stories. It's something very interesting.
+- ewj.io/emacs
+- 👏 I'll start writing my masterpiece tomorrow!
+- I need to use tags more, org-sparse-tree is handy
+
+
+## Questions and answers
+
+- Q: Does the index really matter here? I mean, his colleague is also
+ using some A4 paper, and do you think that the index card is the
+ most important thing here?
+ - A:
+ - portbablity win!
+- Q:How do you export the second level headings (scenes in this
+ example) without the heading itself, just the content? 
+ - A:3 ways for this: ox-ignore (it was visually annoying), dumb
+ awk script, pandoc filters in lua
+ - I would say the org-transclusion works very well for this
+ kind of demand.
+- Q: Slightly offtopic: where can we see your novels?
+ - A: there are on Amazon: two of them, and a book of short-stories
+ - Links:<https://www.amazon.com/World-Enough-Time-Edmund-Jorgensen/dp/0984749233>
+ - <https://www.amazon.com/Other-Copenhagens-Stories-Edmund-Jorgensen-ebook/dp/B00O4OQCBE>
+- Q: Have you looked at the Denote Signature features. The
+ hierarchical nature of luhman IDs and index cards work well with
+ Denote Signatures
+ - A:I haven't, but I will take a look!
+ - <https://protesilaos.com/emacs/denote#h:f9204f1f-fcee-49b1-8081-16a08a338099>
+ - The part that I like with signatures is they can be optional
+ with your zettelkasten as another way to use it.
+- Q: Do you have a workflow combining hand-written index cards and org
+ mode?
+ - A:
+ - Maybe just take a picture and OCR for your small index
+ cards, but at the end of the day you always have to go back
+ to your main Org files.
+ - Ooh, I have a workflow for using Google's OCR to grab
+ the text from my sketches (esp. the ID) so that I can
+ link to my sketches in Org with ID and completion -
+ sachac
+ - haha, nice to see different approach, I personally
+ didn't do that because I still most of my work is
+ on the computer so yeah in the future if i have lots
+ of handwriting notes in my working I will reconsider
+ Google solution
+- Q:
+ - A:
+
+
+[[!inline pages="internal(2023/info/nabokov-after)" raw="yes"]]
+
+[[!inline pages="internal(2023/info/nabokov-nav)" raw="yes"]]
+
+