summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-nabokov--why-nabokov-would-use-orgmode-if-he-were-writing-today--edmund-jorgensen--answers.vtt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-nabokov--why-nabokov-would-use-orgmode-if-he-were-writing-today--edmund-jorgensen--answers.vtt')
-rw-r--r--2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-nabokov--why-nabokov-would-use-orgmode-if-he-were-writing-today--edmund-jorgensen--answers.vtt680
1 files changed, 680 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-nabokov--why-nabokov-would-use-orgmode-if-he-were-writing-today--edmund-jorgensen--answers.vtt b/2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-nabokov--why-nabokov-would-use-orgmode-if-he-were-writing-today--edmund-jorgensen--answers.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..20053853
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-nabokov--why-nabokov-would-use-orgmode-if-he-were-writing-today--edmund-jorgensen--answers.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,680 @@
+WEBVTT
+
+
+00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:04.059
+[Speaker 0]: About 3
+
+00:00:16.020 --> 00:00:16.400
+seconds. And I believe we are live.
+
+00:00:17.280 --> 00:00:17.780
+Hi Edmund, how are you doing?
+
+00:00:19.240 --> 00:00:19.540
+[Speaker 1]: Hi, how's it going Leo?
+
+00:00:20.279 --> 00:00:20.560
+I'm doing well, thanks.
+
+00:00:20.560 --> 00:00:21.060
+Yourself?
+
+00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:24.640
+[Speaker 0]: I'm also doing well. So Edmund doesn't have
+
+00:00:26.980 --> 00:00:27.259
+his webcam on but he will be able to answer
+
+00:00:29.960 --> 00:00:30.360
+questions that you ask inside of the Azure
+
+00:00:32.159 --> 00:00:32.659
+pad that I've shared again on IRC.
+
+00:00:35.440 --> 00:00:35.560
+By the way, we only have 1 question and we
+
+00:00:37.120 --> 00:00:37.620
+have about 40 minutes of question time,
+
+00:00:40.380 --> 00:00:40.520
+so feel free to add as many questions as you
+
+00:00:41.940 --> 00:00:42.340
+want and in the meantime,
+
+00:00:43.380 --> 00:00:43.660
+we'll get started on the first 1.
+
+00:00:45.020 --> 00:00:45.060
+Unless, Edmond, do you have anything to say
+
+00:00:45.920 --> 00:00:46.420
+after your presentation?
+
+00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:48.780
+[Speaker 1]: No, we can jump in.
+
+00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:52.060
+[Speaker 0]: Okay, lovely. So first question,
+
+00:00:54.940 --> 00:00:55.200
+is the index, sorry, does the index really
+
+00:00:57.840 --> 00:00:58.100
+matter here? I mean his colleague is also
+
+00:01:00.380 --> 00:01:00.560
+using some A4 paper and you think that the
+
+00:01:02.400 --> 00:01:02.900
+index card is the most important thing here?
+
+00:01:04.540 --> 00:01:04.920
+[Speaker 1]: That's a great question.
+
+00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:08.200
+I mean, I think you can do anything with a
+
+00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:09.720
+larger piece of paper that you can do with a
+
+00:01:10.240 --> 00:01:10.460
+smaller piece of paper.
+
+00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:12.479
+But I actually encourage you to try this out.
+
+00:01:14.820 --> 00:01:15.020
+I did, not for research for this talk,
+
+00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:17.160
+but just when I read about Nabokov and his
+
+00:01:18.160 --> 00:01:18.400
+index cards to begin with,
+
+00:01:20.380 --> 00:01:20.660
+I kind of tried it out a little bit and wrote
+
+00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:22.720
+some shorter things on index cards and so on
+
+00:01:24.640 --> 00:01:25.120
+and there really is something about the size
+
+00:01:27.940 --> 00:01:28.440
+and the kind of ability to manipulate them.
+
+00:01:30.200 --> 00:01:30.360
+You really can bundle them and move them
+
+00:01:33.420 --> 00:01:33.720
+around easier and I think that that I think
+
+00:01:35.800 --> 00:01:35.920
+he enjoyed that. So sure I mean I think you
+
+00:01:37.540 --> 00:01:37.660
+can do anything with a4 paper that you could
+
+00:01:38.860 --> 00:01:39.140
+do with index cards but I think there's
+
+00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:41.200
+something about that form that lends itself
+
+00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:44.160
+to the especially to the reorganization maybe
+
+00:01:45.540 --> 00:01:45.820
+to the focus as well just because it's
+
+00:01:47.060 --> 00:01:47.220
+smaller but but definitely to the
+
+00:01:47.220 --> 00:01:47.720
+reorganization.
+
+00:01:53.600 --> 00:01:53.940
+[Speaker 0]: Definitely So we have a lot more questions
+
+00:01:54.640 --> 00:01:54.960
+now. So thank you, everyone,
+
+00:01:56.479 --> 00:01:56.979
+for answering my plea for more questions.
+
+00:01:59.760 --> 00:02:00.060
+Next question. How do you explore the second
+
+00:02:01.880 --> 00:02:02.080
+level headings, i.e. The scenes in this
+
+00:02:03.600 --> 00:02:04.100
+example, without the heading itself,
+
+00:02:05.740 --> 00:02:06.240
+just the content? Is that clear enough?
+
+00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:09.740
+[Speaker 1]: Great question. Yeah, so I've tried 2 ways,
+
+00:02:13.280 --> 00:02:13.440
+sorry, 3 ways with this and landed on 1 that
+
+00:02:16.080 --> 00:02:16.480
+I like. Originally I used the OX package.
+
+00:02:20.080 --> 00:02:20.220
+There's an OX ignore thing in there where you
+
+00:02:23.240 --> 00:02:23.420
+can add an ignore tag to where you don't want
+
+00:02:24.720 --> 00:02:25.140
+the headings, but you do want the content
+
+00:02:26.920 --> 00:02:27.240
+exported. I found that a little bit annoying,
+
+00:02:27.940 --> 00:02:28.280
+just visually annoying,
+
+00:02:31.320 --> 00:02:31.820
+when I'm, again, My theme here is navigating
+
+00:02:34.840 --> 00:02:35.160
+100,000 word documents effectively and having
+
+00:02:36.900 --> 00:02:37.400
+that extra visual noise was kind of a pain.
+
+00:02:40.520 --> 00:02:40.760
+So I ended up, first I just did like a dumb
+
+00:02:43.040 --> 00:02:43.180
+ox script as part of my publication kind of
+
+00:02:47.720 --> 00:02:47.980
+pipeline that removed headlines at the scene
+
+00:02:48.940 --> 00:02:49.240
+level. And then actually,
+
+00:02:50.980 --> 00:02:51.220
+because I ended up leaning so heavily on
+
+00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:53.880
+Pandoc, and Pandoc, for those of you who have
+
+00:02:56.200 --> 00:02:56.700
+not looked at recent versions of Pandoc,
+
+00:03:00.920 --> 00:03:01.300
+they've got a really fantastic way to use Lua
+
+00:03:02.420 --> 00:03:02.920
+at this point to write filters.
+
+00:03:04.940 --> 00:03:05.140
+So you can kind of take the AST of your
+
+00:03:07.120 --> 00:03:07.400
+document and run these very simple Lua
+
+00:03:09.140 --> 00:03:09.620
+filters over it. They used to be in Haskell,
+
+00:03:11.780 --> 00:03:12.120
+which I'm not smart enough to write Haskell
+
+00:03:13.140 --> 00:03:13.500
+is 1 of the things that I've discovered.
+
+00:03:14.440 --> 00:03:14.760
+I keep bouncing off of it,
+
+00:03:16.360 --> 00:03:16.720
+but I'm just smart enough to write Lua.
+
+00:03:19.480 --> 00:03:19.840
+And so I use a Lua filter now,
+
+00:03:21.180 --> 00:03:21.380
+which I'm happy to publish to anyone who's
+
+00:03:22.880 --> 00:03:23.380
+interested. That basically lets me say,
+
+00:03:27.440 --> 00:03:27.560
+you know, what level headings to get rid of
+
+00:03:28.740 --> 00:03:29.120
+the heading, but publish the content.
+
+00:03:30.320 --> 00:03:30.480
+And part of the reason that's been useful is
+
+00:03:31.920 --> 00:03:32.040
+that some of the other novels I'm working on
+
+00:03:33.540 --> 00:03:33.680
+for example have different levels of
+
+00:03:35.640 --> 00:03:35.740
+hierarchy where maybe there's a part and then
+
+00:03:37.260 --> 00:03:37.640
+you know at the top level and then chapter
+
+00:03:39.160 --> 00:03:39.520
+and then scene and it's now the third level
+
+00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:41.580
+instead of the second and it's much easier in
+
+00:03:43.840 --> 00:03:44.060
+the Lua to just be like remove the third
+
+00:03:45.400 --> 00:03:45.700
+level headings or the second level headings
+
+00:03:47.680 --> 00:03:47.860
+or whatever it is so that's been that's been
+
+00:03:47.860 --> 00:03:48.360
+helpful.
+
+00:03:53.040 --> 00:03:53.540
+[Speaker 0]: Great, Moving on to the next question,
+
+00:03:58.120 --> 00:03:58.260
+slightly off topic, where can we see your
+
+00:03:58.260 --> 00:03:58.760
+novels?
+
+00:04:01.060 --> 00:04:01.560
+[Speaker 1]: Oh well yeah, you can,
+
+00:04:05.500 --> 00:04:05.560
+they're on Amazon, there's 2 of them and a
+
+00:04:06.160 --> 00:04:06.660
+book of short stories.
+
+00:04:10.120 --> 00:04:10.440
+I think the short stories and the second
+
+00:04:11.960 --> 00:04:12.280
+novel, which is called World Enough in Time,
+
+00:04:13.940 --> 00:04:14.160
+which is the 1 that kind of prompted this
+
+00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:16.660
+talk, are probably of more interest to this,
+
+00:04:18.320 --> 00:04:18.820
+to the Emacs focused group.
+
+00:04:20.380 --> 00:04:20.740
+The first one's like a philosophical murder
+
+00:04:25.240 --> 00:04:25.440
+mystery, but the World Enough in Time is a
+
+00:04:29.820 --> 00:04:30.320
+kind of Douglas Adams inspired sci-fi comedy
+
+00:04:34.440 --> 00:04:34.940
+about kind of hijinks on a relativistic speed
+
+00:04:37.360 --> 00:04:37.480
+space cruiser, which was a lot of fun to
+
+00:04:38.980 --> 00:04:39.480
+write. It has a lot of twisty subplots,
+
+00:04:42.500 --> 00:04:42.720
+which is where I developed that technique of
+
+00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:46.780
+being able to filter down to tags and see a
+
+00:04:47.840 --> 00:04:48.340
+reduced version of the novel,
+
+00:04:51.560 --> 00:04:51.960
+which was very handy when trying to juggle 13
+
+00:04:53.520 --> 00:04:54.020
+subplots. So yeah, check it out.
+
+00:04:57.240 --> 00:04:57.340
+[Speaker 0]: Great, we'll make sure that you have the
+
+00:04:59.860 --> 00:05:00.360
+links available on the talk page afterwards.
+
+00:05:03.420 --> 00:05:03.740
+Right now I sadly have to host so I cannot
+
+00:05:05.680 --> 00:05:05.820
+look up the links but we'll make sure or if
+
+00:05:08.100 --> 00:05:08.600
+[Speaker 1]: I put it in there for you.
+
+00:05:09.020 --> 00:05:09.520
+[Speaker 0]: anyone in the chat... Oh you did?
+
+00:05:13.800 --> 00:05:13.940
+Yeah. In the meantime we'll move on to the
+
+00:05:16.560 --> 00:05:17.060
+next question. Have you looked at the Denote
+
+00:05:19.700 --> 00:05:20.080
+signature features? The hierarchical nature
+
+00:05:23.180 --> 00:05:23.520
+of Lumen's ideas and index cards works well
+
+00:05:24.100 --> 00:05:24.600
+with Denote signatures.
+
+00:05:26.120 --> 00:05:26.620
+So are you familiar with Denote first?
+
+00:05:28.740 --> 00:05:28.840
+[Speaker 1]: I am not. No, it sounds like something that I
+
+00:05:29.240 --> 00:05:29.740
+should check out.
+
+00:05:33.080 --> 00:05:33.420
+[Speaker 0]: Yeah, Denote is a way to work with slip
+
+00:05:35.460 --> 00:05:35.640
+boxes. We talked a little bit about it
+
+00:05:37.240 --> 00:05:37.740
+earlier today. We talked about Orgroam,
+
+00:05:40.600 --> 00:05:40.900
+we talked about Denote as well as a lighter
+
+00:05:41.580 --> 00:05:42.080
+alternative to Orgroam.
+
+00:05:45.520 --> 00:05:45.920
+And yeah, the organization with index cards
+
+00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:47.720
+feels like it's something that would highly
+
+00:05:50.740 --> 00:05:50.900
+benefit from linking and back links and any
+
+00:05:53.880 --> 00:05:54.380
+kind of UX functionality for relating pieces
+
+00:05:56.680 --> 00:05:56.980
+of information. So yeah,
+
+00:05:57.620 --> 00:05:58.120
+definitely look it up.
+
+00:06:00.040 --> 00:06:00.460
+[Speaker 1]: Yeah, I'm a heavy org-roam user.
+
+00:06:03.280 --> 00:06:03.680
+I use org-roam for a lot of different stuff
+
+00:06:05.740 --> 00:06:05.860
+and I would love, I will definitely check out
+
+00:06:06.740 --> 00:06:07.240
+Denote as an alternative.
+
+00:06:09.520 --> 00:06:09.960
+[Speaker 0]: Sure, I'm not particularly personally
+
+00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:12.180
+familiar with what Signature is within Denote
+
+00:06:13.940 --> 00:06:14.060
+and it'd be great if the person who asked the
+
+00:06:15.580 --> 00:06:15.980
+question could perhaps provide more details
+
+00:06:17.980 --> 00:06:18.180
+so that Edmund could get a little more
+
+00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:20.500
+information when he returns to the document.
+
+00:06:21.480 --> 00:06:21.980
+But yeah, if you're using Org-ROM,
+
+00:06:25.140 --> 00:06:25.280
+you're already within the mindset that you
+
+00:06:27.180 --> 00:06:27.500
+need, and perhaps you'd gain a little bit
+
+00:06:29.260 --> 00:06:29.760
+extra stuff from using Dino's signature,
+
+00:06:32.920 --> 00:06:33.240
+I assume. We have 8 minutes.
+
+00:06:34.040 --> 00:06:34.540
+We're still good on time.
+
+00:06:36.500 --> 00:06:36.980
+Next question, do you have a workflow
+
+00:06:39.020 --> 00:06:39.360
+combining handwritten index cards and org
+
+00:06:39.360 --> 00:06:39.860
+mode?
+
+00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:42.900
+[Speaker 1]: Great question. I do not.
+
+00:06:46.620 --> 00:06:47.120
+I do write by hand when I get,
+
+00:06:49.120 --> 00:06:49.280
+I don't know what a good term for it is,
+
+00:06:51.420 --> 00:06:51.580
+I'll call it like editorial paralysis or
+
+00:06:53.100 --> 00:06:53.320
+something when I find it very hard to move
+
+00:06:54.720 --> 00:06:54.880
+forward in something because I keep going
+
+00:06:56.940 --> 00:06:57.240
+back and tweaking. And I will handwrite stuff
+
+00:06:58.520 --> 00:06:58.660
+at that point and then type it in because
+
+00:07:02.120 --> 00:07:02.540
+it's so much harder to get stuck in editing
+
+00:07:04.480 --> 00:07:04.600
+mode when you have to move forward on the
+
+00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:07.860
+page. I don't use index cards.
+
+00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:12.080
+In the blog article that I link in my talk,
+
+00:07:14.400 --> 00:07:14.900
+the ewj.io slash emacs 1,
+
+00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:18.740
+I did try using handwritten or spreadsheet
+
+00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:22.720
+outlines at 1 point and found them very,
+
+00:07:27.640 --> 00:07:27.840
+very clumsy for novel writing just because I
+
+00:07:29.820 --> 00:07:30.320
+do so much, I mean, I do so much revision
+
+00:07:32.600 --> 00:07:32.720
+that moving things around meant that I had to
+
+00:07:34.480 --> 00:07:34.760
+keep 2 things in sync with each other,
+
+00:07:35.440 --> 00:07:35.660
+the pros and the outline.
+
+00:07:37.540 --> 00:07:38.040
+And that was what really led me to Org Mode
+
+00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:40.080
+as a way to keep the, again,
+
+00:07:42.040 --> 00:07:42.180
+I think part of the key for me is keeping the
+
+00:07:44.580 --> 00:07:45.060
+outline and the pros right next to each other
+
+00:07:46.440 --> 00:07:46.940
+in a way that they move around which is just
+
+00:07:48.800 --> 00:07:49.000
+really, I don't know, for me really really
+
+00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:49.500
+powerful.
+
+00:07:54.280 --> 00:07:54.480
+[Speaker 0]: Okay great, so we finished the list of
+
+00:07:55.840 --> 00:07:56.340
+questions available on the pad,
+
+00:07:58.260 --> 00:07:58.440
+but I see that some people have joined us on
+
+00:08:01.100 --> 00:08:01.300
+BBB, so hi everyone. If you have any
+
+00:08:03.340 --> 00:08:03.600
+questions feel free to unmute yourself and
+
+00:08:06.560 --> 00:08:06.820
+ask them. Otherwise, we might go on a break.
+
+00:08:08.360 --> 00:08:08.520
+So I'm going to give you about 10 seconds to
+
+00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:14.760
+unmute yourself. Or if you just want to add
+
+00:08:15.660 --> 00:08:15.860
+more questions on the pad,
+
+00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:17.920
+that's also fine. And that'll give you about
+
+00:08:19.540 --> 00:08:19.860
+30 seconds. Otherwise,
+
+00:08:20.660 --> 00:08:21.160
+we'll need to go on a break.
+
+00:08:24.020 --> 00:08:24.520
+And in the meantime, I'll thank you,
+
+00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:26.100
+Edmund, for your presentation,
+
+00:08:27.880 --> 00:08:28.100
+because it's always nice,
+
+00:08:31.400 --> 00:08:31.900
+you know, we The reason why we have 2 tracks,
+
+00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:34.280
+and we've been having 2 tracks for the last 2
+
+00:08:36.039 --> 00:08:36.260
+or 3 editions of EmacsConf is because it's
+
+00:08:38.799 --> 00:08:39.299
+really nice to have those talks which are
+
+00:08:43.500 --> 00:08:43.840
+still related to Emacs and to far distance
+
+00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:45.700
+developments because we are obviously using
+
+00:08:48.160 --> 00:08:48.400
+packages. But it's really nice to see when we
+
+00:08:51.960 --> 00:08:52.200
+foray into other areas like writing or any
+
+00:08:53.400 --> 00:08:53.900
+kind of academia-based topics.
+
+00:08:55.440 --> 00:08:55.840
+So thank you, it's really nice.
+
+00:09:01.500 --> 00:09:01.720
+It brings different colors to the spectrum of
+
+00:09:03.580 --> 00:09:03.900
+what EmacsConf is and what ultimately Emacs
+
+00:09:04.680 --> 00:09:05.180
+is as well. Thank you.
+
+00:09:06.960 --> 00:09:07.200
+[Speaker 1]: Well thanks to everyone who tuned in and Leo
+
+00:09:08.160 --> 00:09:08.560
+thanks to you and all the other organizers
+
+00:09:09.060 --> 00:09:09.340
+for putting this together.
+
+00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:10.220
+Appreciate it.
+
+00:09:12.720 --> 00:09:12.840
+[Speaker 0]: Thank you. All right I think we're going to
+
+00:09:14.380 --> 00:09:14.540
+go on a little break for 5 minutes because I
+
+00:09:16.060 --> 00:09:16.560
+don't see other questions being asked.
+
+00:09:18.900 --> 00:09:19.160
+So everyone we'll see you again in 5 minutes
+
+00:09:19.900 --> 00:09:20.400
+and thank you again, Edmund.
+
+00:09:20.720 --> 00:09:21.220
+[Speaker 1]: Cheers.