diff options
| author | Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> | 2026-10-20 05:25:02 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> | 2026-10-20 05:26:12 +0200 |
| commit | 465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9 (patch) | |
| tree | 3afe5899b110eb5c277a12144f323c82dd30dd1c /2026/talks | |
| parent | 4dae3ad5fba98262b2a55f1add8addd4f47c0f61 (diff) | |
| download | emacsconf-wiki-465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9.tar.xz emacsconf-wiki-465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9.zip | |
2026/talks/llms.md: Use the latest version of questions
Diffstat (limited to '2026/talks')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2026/talks/llms.md | 7 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/2026/talks/llms.md b/2026/talks/llms.md index 61dc86f8..65072339 100644 --- a/2026/talks/llms.md +++ b/2026/talks/llms.md @@ -45,12 +45,13 @@ Questions: 1. If you were to imagine an ideal AI software you would use with Emacs, how would it look like? How would it **not** look like? What freedoms it would need to have? Feel free to answer anything, not - limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. + limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. If your answer is + that no such software should exist, that is a valid answer. 2. What is the most useful application of LLMs with Emacs for you personally? If you are not using LLMs, imagine that there is an - ideal AI or complex automation software you would be willing to use - and come up with such application. + ideal AI or complex automation software (non-AI) you would be + willing to use and come up with such application. 3. What is the most critical use case in your Emacs workflows where you would **avoid** using AI? |