diff options
| author | Sacha Chua <sacha@sachachua.com> | 2024-12-12 09:31:16 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sacha Chua <sacha@sachachua.com> | 2024-12-12 09:31:16 -0500 |
| commit | 627a997908721fb2c546a4490eca1de5055d57d8 (patch) | |
| tree | a2681d59ce6678c96c00972c370d559643faa9c2 /2024/talks/gypsum.md | |
| parent | 6d1d18532c1d0495a1fd42e6f1b2f7d165efe0a2 (diff) | |
| download | emacsconf-wiki-627a997908721fb2c546a4490eca1de5055d57d8.tar.xz emacsconf-wiki-627a997908721fb2c546a4490eca1de5055d57d8.zip | |
Add YouTube comments
Diffstat (limited to '2024/talks/gypsum.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2024/talks/gypsum.md | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/2024/talks/gypsum.md b/2024/talks/gypsum.md index c566357c..3ee7c4cd 100644 --- a/2024/talks/gypsum.md +++ b/2024/talks/gypsum.md @@ -456,7 +456,8 @@ You may also like another talk by this speaker: - guile-elisp is part of guile's compiler system (elisp -> tree-il -> cps -> bytecode), unless another scheme sets out to be guile-compatible in that respect it won't be portable at all - To be fair, I've been screwing around with chicken, guile, and racket. I haven't found any 2 scheme implementations to be compatible, even within SRFI implementations - Just the basic syntax and semantics, nothing else - - yeah, scheme's lack of portable libraries in practice motivated me to suggest something that's sure to piss everyone off; Javascript + - yeah, scheme's lack of portable libraries in practice motivated me to suggest something that's sure to piss everyone off: Javascript +- YouTube comment: Cool, great, amazing. Extremely ambitious. A clone like this project might be significant harder than for example Lem, which does not care about backward compatibility with Emacs. A clone also is somewhat harder to create a unique selling point for. Especially if Guile-Emacs is also going to be a thing now. Just my 2 cents up to discussions. Anyway I am excited and will follow it:) [[!inline pages="internal(2024/info/gypsum-after)" raw="yes"]] |