summaryrefslogblamecommitdiffstats
path: root/2023/captions/emacsconf-2023-emacsen--the-emacsen-family-the-design-of-an-emacs-and-the-importance-of-lisp--fermin--main.vtt
blob: b078c281adc3e0aa5fade24efb4a64bf80614d1f (plain) (tree)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079






















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































                                                              
WEBVTT captioned by sachac, checked by sachac

NOTE Introduction

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.199
Hello, my name is Fermin.

00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:06.959
Today, I'm going to talk about the Emacsen family,

00:00:06.960 --> 00:00:11.159
the design of an Emacs, and the importance of Lisp.

00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:13.519
So we're going to talk about Lisp.

00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:16.999
I want to start from the end.

NOTE Why Lisp matters

00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:19.039
The first question I want to ask is

00:00:19.040 --> 00:00:21.399
why I think Lisp matters.

00:00:21.400 --> 00:00:22.879
When I'm talking about Lisp here,

00:00:22.880 --> 00:00:27.559
I'm talking about the idea of Lisp,

00:00:27.560 --> 00:00:30.119
so the family of languages that are Lisp.

00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:34.719
But given that there's no formal specification of Lisp,

00:00:34.720 --> 00:00:40.599
so the opinion might vary. I will expect that Lisp,

00:00:40.600 --> 00:00:44.439
most of the Lisp have these kind of features.

00:00:44.440 --> 00:00:46.239
The first one is homoiconic:

00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:49.799
the code is data, basically.

00:00:49.800 --> 00:00:52.559
They also have a REPL: read-eval-print loop.

00:00:52.560 --> 00:00:57.759
That is very powerful and can help in development.

00:00:57.760 --> 00:01:00.359
Also, I think a good Lisp

00:01:00.360 --> 00:01:03.319
should have a powerful macro system.

00:01:03.320 --> 00:01:05.759
I'm good with compile-time macros,

00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:07.599
but read-time is also interesting.

00:01:07.600 --> 00:01:10.279
There's a lot of Lisp that you can choose.

00:01:10.280 --> 00:01:11.999
There's the main three ones, of course,

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:13.839
with Scheme, Common Lisp, and Clojure.

00:01:13.840 --> 00:01:19.674
Scheme by Guile, Common Lisp by Common Lisp,

00:01:19.675 --> 00:01:26.639
and Clojure by Clojure or ClojureScript.

NOTE Why Emacs Lisp was chosen

00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:28.079
So let's talk about Emacs Lisp.

00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:29.679
I didn't mention Emacs Lisp.

00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:32.519
I'm going to talk about why Emacs Lisp

00:01:32.520 --> 00:01:35.599
was chosen for an Emacs editor.

00:01:35.600 --> 00:01:39.159
We're going to explore this kind of design of the Emacs.

00:01:39.160 --> 00:01:42.279
And Emacs Lisp is the main language of it. Why?

00:01:42.280 --> 00:01:44.959
Given that there were a few alternatives at the time,

00:01:44.960 --> 00:01:48.159
why Emacs Lisp was chosen?

00:01:48.160 --> 00:01:51.919
So RMS, Richard Stallman, needed a Lisp,

00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:54.279
and there wasn't one available at the time.

00:01:54.280 --> 00:01:57.039
Keep in mind, this was the early 80s.

00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:03.240
Stallman was writing at that point the GCC, I think,

00:02:03.241 --> 00:02:07.974
and he was writing the core components

00:02:07.975 --> 00:02:10.440
of what is going to become GNU.

00:02:10.441 --> 00:02:15.499
He needed an editor. He wanted Lisp. He wanted Emacs.

00:02:15.500 --> 00:02:20.280
So he wrote Emacs Lisp. So at that time,

00:02:20.281 --> 00:02:24.599
the functionality was more important than "perfection."

00:02:24.600 --> 00:02:26.639
What I mean [by] "perfection" is: we programmers

00:02:26.640 --> 00:02:33.359
sometimes like to make everything good

00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:36.479
or very, very good when sometimes, indeed,

00:02:36.480 --> 00:02:39.119
it's more important that it works

00:02:39.120 --> 00:02:42.919
to do the task that it should.

00:02:42.920 --> 00:02:44.199
And it's not a bad language.

00:02:44.200 --> 00:02:50.239
It's not that bad. At that time, it was mostly nice.

00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:54.840
Today, it's good enough, I think.

NOTE Other "Emacsen"

00:02:54.841 --> 00:02:59.460
He wasn't the first one, the GNU Emacs,

00:02:59.461 --> 00:03:02.540
nor the only one, of course.

00:03:02.541 --> 00:03:06.439
There were others: Hemlock, Zmacs, and Climacs...

00:03:06.440 --> 00:03:08.980
Two of them, I think, were written in Common Lisp,

00:03:08.981 --> 00:03:14.479
and Zmacs was written in a Lisp from a Lisp machine,

00:03:14.480 --> 00:03:16.639
so it was an implementation of Emacs.

00:03:16.640 --> 00:03:19.039
Not GNU Emacs, but the original idea

00:03:19.040 --> 00:03:22.079
of Emacs for a Lisp machine.

00:03:22.080 --> 00:03:23.759
So Hemlock was written in Common Lisp,

00:03:23.760 --> 00:03:26.079
but it's no longer used and no longer developed,

00:03:26.080 --> 00:03:28.999
as far as I know. And Climacs, it was developed,

00:03:29.000 --> 00:03:31.519
but it was abandoned, I think.

00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:33.639
So three of them failed for different reasons.

00:03:33.640 --> 00:03:37.879
Zmacs was because of the Lisp machine market crash,

00:03:37.880 --> 00:03:38.580
and yeah, it also failed.

NOTE Why not Common Lisp?

00:03:38.581 --> 00:03:44.039
So Emacs got alone. And in the 90s, interesting to explore,

00:03:44.040 --> 00:03:46.479
some people suggest that why

00:03:46.480 --> 00:03:49.679
now that we have a standard Lisp, right,

00:03:49.680 --> 00:03:52.559
because Common Lisp was standardized in '94,

00:03:52.560 --> 00:03:56.719
why don't we change Emacs Lisp to Common Lisp?

00:03:56.720 --> 00:03:58.999
These are the other reasons I think are important,

00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:01.159
because that's why Stallman didn't choose Common Lisp.

00:04:01.160 --> 00:04:02.039
But I think the main one

00:04:02.040 --> 00:04:03.759
that I didn't write here

00:04:03.760 --> 00:04:09.039
is that Stallman wasn't a big fan of Common Lisp,

00:04:09.040 --> 00:04:12.679
and he was at the time the main developer

00:04:12.680 --> 00:04:14.040
and maintainer, of course, for Emacs.

00:04:14.041 --> 00:04:16.439
So he chose not to move to Common Lisp.

00:04:16.440 --> 00:04:18.479
But other reasons may be why...

00:04:18.480 --> 00:04:22.919
Because he had a late and painful standardization.

00:04:22.920 --> 00:04:28.039
Keep in mind, the first book that Guy Steele wrote

00:04:28.040 --> 00:04:32.239
was in 1984. The standardization finished in 19--

00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:38.279
sorry, in 1984 was the first book

00:04:38.280 --> 00:04:44.420
and the standardization finished in 1994.

00:04:44.421 --> 00:04:48.119
So, like, 10 years of difference from one to the other.

00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:51.879
10 years of a lot of talk, a lot of money,

00:04:51.880 --> 00:04:56.399
and a lot of pain probably.

00:04:56.400 --> 00:04:59.199
The Lisp usage declined in the 90s

00:04:59.200 --> 00:05:00.959
due to the AI winter.

00:05:00.960 --> 00:05:03.359
We all know about the Lisp machine market crash.

00:05:03.360 --> 00:05:08.839
And the failure of commercial Lisp machine was

00:05:08.840 --> 00:05:12.239
inevitable at that point.

00:05:12.240 --> 00:05:17.160
So all the potential Emacs friends died.

00:05:17.161 --> 00:05:21.279
And also a lot of Emacs Lisp was already available.

00:05:21.280 --> 00:05:24.559
Emacs was already an amateur utility.

00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:29.959
Unix won the war of the operating system, as we know,

00:05:29.960 --> 00:05:33.839
and Emacs Lisp was available in Unix,

00:05:33.840 --> 00:05:36.919
or in GNU/Linux, as we know,

00:05:36.920 --> 00:05:40.479
which is the most successful implementation of Unix.

00:05:40.480 --> 00:05:44.207
Sorry, BSD. Okay.

00:05:44.208 --> 00:05:48.399
So Emacs won by being the "better" alternative.

00:05:48.400 --> 00:05:49.999
I'm quoting "better" here because

00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:53.699
I think Emacs does have a better design

00:05:53.700 --> 00:05:56.959
and, well, it was the one that survived, right?

00:05:56.960 --> 00:06:00.039
Which is the more important thing for a software or,

00:06:00.040 --> 00:06:05.159
you know... So Emacs won by being free,

00:06:05.160 --> 00:06:08.399
also in price, which I think the Lisp machine wasn't.

00:06:08.400 --> 00:06:11.519
So that was also very good. It was included.

00:06:11.520 --> 00:06:14.559
It had, and it still has, of course,

00:06:14.560 --> 00:06:15.879
a nice collection of packages

00:06:15.880 --> 00:06:20.679
that improve the standard functionality.

00:06:20.680 --> 00:06:23.479
It was easy to extend because of the nature of Lisp.

00:06:23.480 --> 00:06:26.039
And it has a very good integration with GNU/Linux,

00:06:26.040 --> 00:06:29.399
of course. It was created to write it.

00:06:29.400 --> 00:06:31.079
It makes sense that it's very good

00:06:31.080 --> 00:06:39.119
for a system administration perspective.

NOTE Common Lisp is still not dead or is always dead

00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:43.319
But I think Common Lisp is not dead yet.

00:06:43.320 --> 00:06:45.719
Or some people say that it's always dead,

00:06:45.720 --> 00:06:48.399
so you cannot kill the something that is always dead.

00:06:48.400 --> 00:06:50.719
So I don't always code in C,

00:06:50.720 --> 00:06:54.199
but when I do, it's Lisp. I'm not a big fan of C

00:06:54.200 --> 00:06:58.599
for a lot of things, but yeah.

00:06:58.600 --> 00:07:02.439
Why I think Common Lisp is still relevant

00:07:02.440 --> 00:07:05.399
and can be used for all kind of application,

00:07:05.400 --> 00:07:09.279
both commercially and non-commercially.

00:07:09.280 --> 00:07:11.839
The first one is the main implementation

00:07:11.840 --> 00:07:16.799
of Common Lisp, which is called SBCL, which is awesome.

00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:19.399
It's fast. It's a very good extension.

00:07:19.400 --> 00:07:21.639
Basically, it's the reference one today.

00:07:21.640 --> 00:07:25.559
The namespaces of common Lisp,

00:07:25.560 --> 00:07:26.879
I really like the implementation.

00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:28.719
Some people don't like it. It's a matter of taste.

00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:29.639
But I think it's really good.

00:07:29.640 --> 00:07:32.919
I have a timeless standard. So it was standardized

00:07:32.920 --> 00:07:35.979
in the 90s, as I said.

00:07:35.980 --> 00:07:38.880
And it doesn't really need a new standard.

00:07:38.881 --> 00:07:44.119
Some people say it does need, but I don't think so.

00:07:44.120 --> 00:07:45.999
Also it does have macro readers,

00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:49.159
which I think is a very nice feature of Common Lisp

00:07:49.160 --> 00:07:51.239
that other Lisp doesn't seem to have,

00:07:51.240 --> 00:07:56.719
or a lot of them don't: in my mind, Emacs Lisp and Clojure.

00:07:56.720 --> 00:07:58.199
Also, it's image-based development,

00:07:58.200 --> 00:08:00.399
which is also quite unique to Common Lisp.

00:08:00.400 --> 00:08:04.359
I don't know all the Lisp that does have this.

00:08:04.360 --> 00:08:05.359
Basically, you develop a REPL

00:08:05.360 --> 00:08:10.159
and then you dump the entire REPL into an image.

00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:12.079
Java would be like a core dump.

00:08:12.080 --> 00:08:14.159
And you create an executable.

00:08:14.160 --> 00:08:17.159
Which at the time, I guess in the 90s,

00:08:17.160 --> 00:08:18.199
was a huge one, right?

00:08:18.200 --> 00:08:20.679
Because you have the entire language, and the REPL,

00:08:20.680 --> 00:08:23.799
and the code. But today are like 20 MB,

00:08:23.800 --> 00:08:26.599
which in today's standard is nothing.

00:08:26.600 --> 00:08:30.079
There's pictures in your phone larger than 20 MB.

NOTE Lem is a nice Emacsen implementation

00:08:30.080 --> 00:08:39.239
So there's a new Emacs in town--well, Emacs, not Emacs,

00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:43.439
Which is Lem. I think it's a very good Emacs implementation.

00:08:43.440 --> 00:08:46.679
What I mean by "Emacs" here is not a clone of GNU Emacs,

00:08:46.680 --> 00:08:51.559
but an Emacs-inspired editor with similar characteristics,

00:08:51.560 --> 00:08:53.519
and written in a Lisp,

00:08:53.520 --> 00:08:58.259
which is why I said that Lisp was very important.

NOTE Why not just use GNU Emacs?

00:08:58.260 --> 00:09:01.559
So first, I'm going to address the elephant in the room,

00:09:01.560 --> 00:09:05.039
and the question that maybe most

00:09:05.040 --> 00:09:06.159
of you are now thinking.

00:09:06.160 --> 00:09:12.919
Why not just use GNU Emacs? It's the project.

00:09:12.920 --> 00:09:15.759
It's the main one, right? Why choose another one?

00:09:15.760 --> 00:09:18.199
So Lem is relatively new, 2018.

00:09:18.200 --> 00:09:20.199
And it can explore different ideas.

00:09:20.200 --> 00:09:21.679
It was developed by Sasaki-san.

00:09:21.680 --> 00:09:26.719
Basically, it was mostly a one-month project,

00:09:26.720 --> 00:09:31.940
but we are getting there. I'm not the maintainer.

00:09:31.941 --> 00:09:36.959
I'm a developer of Lem. So given that it's

00:09:36.960 --> 00:09:39.239
relatively new, it can explore different ideas.

00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:43.519
You're not bound to a community or backwards compatibility.

00:09:43.520 --> 00:09:45.439
You can explore different ideas,

00:09:45.440 --> 00:09:46.199
and I think that's always nice.

00:09:46.200 --> 00:09:49.839
Having multiple options creates competition,

00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:52.639
which benefits the community. So Emacs and Vim,

00:09:52.640 --> 00:09:54.839
the competition between the two

00:09:54.840 --> 00:09:59.119
always create nice packages like evil or, you know...

00:09:59.120 --> 00:10:03.719
It's really good to have some kind of a competition,

00:10:03.720 --> 00:10:06.159
healthy competition.

00:10:06.160 --> 00:10:08.199
And it doesn't share any code base with GNU Emacs.

00:10:08.200 --> 00:10:12.879
I want to clarify this because some people think that

00:10:12.880 --> 00:10:16.119
Lem is kind of a, you know, Spacemacs or Doom.

00:10:16.120 --> 00:10:19.959
No, it doesn't share any code.

00:10:19.960 --> 00:10:27.759
It has zero Emacs. So that's it.

00:10:27.760 --> 00:10:29.199
Getting this out of the way.

00:10:29.200 --> 00:10:31.079
Why I think Lem is interesting.

NOTE Why Lem

00:10:31.080 --> 00:10:32.359
I'm going to show why Lem.

00:10:32.360 --> 00:10:37.759
Why? You can try Lem, and maybe you like it.

00:10:37.760 --> 00:10:41.319
First thing, these are the features

00:10:41.320 --> 00:10:42.799
that I really like from it.

00:10:42.800 --> 00:10:45.574
Can be different from person to person,

00:10:45.575 --> 00:10:48.279
but I think these are the main ideas

00:10:48.280 --> 00:10:49.999
it brings to the table and are really interesting.

00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:53.119
I want to say that Lem is not a research project.

00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:55.719
It's not like some people did that

00:10:55.720 --> 00:10:57.239
and it's still in development. No, no.

00:10:57.240 --> 00:11:00.039
This is a usable product that can be used

00:11:00.040 --> 00:11:02.039
to [do] day-to-day programming

00:11:02.040 --> 00:11:04.559
in a very good experience.

00:11:04.560 --> 00:11:06.279
This is not like--I want to clarify this

00:11:06.280 --> 00:11:08.719
because some people bring some exploratory projects.

00:11:08.720 --> 00:11:10.799
This is not that one. This is finished.

00:11:10.800 --> 00:11:14.719
Well, finished in the way that you can use it.

00:11:14.720 --> 00:11:17.799
It's not, you know, have everything in place.

00:11:17.800 --> 00:11:20.639
So let's continue.

00:11:20.640 --> 00:11:22.159
It's written 100% in Common Lisp.

00:11:22.160 --> 00:11:23.839
I say this because Emacs is not

00:11:23.840 --> 00:11:26.279
100% in Emacs Lisp.

00:11:26.280 --> 00:11:28.359
You have to modify the C code,

00:11:28.360 --> 00:11:31.839
I think, well, if you... You don't have to,

00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:33.999
but if you want to change the internals, you do.

00:11:34.000 --> 00:11:38.879
I think that given that Lem does not care

00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:41.199
about the implementation of the language itself--

00:11:41.200 --> 00:11:44.039
so for example, Lem doesn't have to deal with

00:11:44.040 --> 00:11:48.199
how Common Lisp works, it just used the language, right?

00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:50.799
It's on top of the language.

00:11:50.800 --> 00:11:53.879
You can say that. Emacs Lisp is Emacs and Emacs Lisp,

00:11:53.880 --> 00:11:56.079
so you have to, you have both in the same place,

00:11:56.080 --> 00:12:00.319
which is, well, it's a double-edged sword, right?

00:12:00.320 --> 00:12:03.319
Then you have the both--similar to Emacs--

00:12:03.320 --> 00:12:05.639
you have ncurses and SDL2 frontends.

00:12:05.640 --> 00:12:08.719
One is terminal-based and the other is graphical

00:12:08.720 --> 00:12:10.399
using the SDL2 library,

00:12:10.400 --> 00:12:13.759
which you can do a lot of crazy things.

00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:16.159
Of course, it's meant to program games and stuff,

00:12:16.160 --> 00:12:19.679
but Lem uses, and it works fairly well.

00:12:19.680 --> 00:12:21.879
You can program games if you want.

00:12:21.880 --> 00:12:27.559
Not that you need to or anything, but we have Tetris.

00:12:27.560 --> 00:12:28.999
So there's that.

00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:31.719
Also, separate front-end interface.

00:12:31.720 --> 00:12:34.159
So like I said, you have two, but you can create more.

00:12:34.160 --> 00:12:36.439
In the past, had an electron one,

00:12:36.440 --> 00:12:41.319
but it got abandoned for obvious reasons, I think. Sorry.

00:12:41.320 --> 00:12:45.839
This idea is taken from Neovim that had a lot of frontends.

00:12:45.840 --> 00:12:48.119
In fact, we don't have that many,

00:12:48.120 --> 00:12:49.639
but not that many people we have two.

00:12:49.640 --> 00:12:51.674
That works fairly well.

00:12:51.675 --> 00:12:56.679
We have superb development experience thanks to SLIME.

00:12:56.680 --> 00:13:01.319
So we have Micro,

00:13:01.320 --> 00:13:04.039
which is a SLIME version for Lem, basically.

00:13:04.040 --> 00:13:08.999
SLIME is awesome and Micro is also awesome.

00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:12.319
We have a very strong development experience

00:13:12.320 --> 00:13:15.399
that we don't have for a Lisp,

00:13:15.400 --> 00:13:17.399
which I think is very important.

00:13:17.400 --> 00:13:20.319
If you want someone to develop packages or to use your tool,

00:13:20.320 --> 00:13:22.719
your Emacs at least,

00:13:22.720 --> 00:13:28.759
you need to have a very good development experience,

00:13:28.760 --> 00:13:34.039
which enhance the extensions for the editor.

00:13:34.040 --> 00:13:36.719
So we have also Vim-like integration.

00:13:36.720 --> 00:13:39.399
This for me was mostly mandatory

00:13:39.400 --> 00:13:44.439
because I'm an evil-mode user, and I think it's really good.

00:13:44.440 --> 00:13:49.479
Because evil-mode is very good and the VMode,

00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:51.719
which it's called, even though it's more like Vim mode,

00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:54.159
it's called VMode. It's written by

00:13:54.160 --> 00:13:59.159
Fukamachi-san and it's really good.

00:13:59.160 --> 00:14:01.959
So yeah, that's the thing that I think Lem brings to

00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:03.079
the table and that's really interesting.

NOTE Similarities and differences

00:14:03.080 --> 00:14:10.519
So I'm going to do a small demo of Lem, a Emacs example.

00:14:10.520 --> 00:14:11.679
First, the similarities,

00:14:11.680 --> 00:14:14.119
the nomenclature is very similar: modes, buffers,

00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:17.439
commands... The commands are very similar in nature.

00:14:17.440 --> 00:14:20.039
It was written with GNU Emacs in mind

00:14:20.040 --> 00:14:24.359
to mimic a lot of things.

00:14:24.360 --> 00:14:29.079
I think GNU Emacs is the best Emacs implementation

00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:33.719
in that way. So why not just take what is working, right?

00:14:33.720 --> 00:14:35.599
I have similar command,

00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:39.399
but flexible to add other default ones.

00:14:39.400 --> 00:14:42.399
It's not like Emacs that you have Emacs commands.

00:14:42.400 --> 00:14:45.159
Lem has Emacs command by default,

00:14:45.160 --> 00:14:47.759
but you can easily change that

00:14:47.760 --> 00:14:49.919
with other default ones, right?

00:14:49.920 --> 00:14:52.159
It's like, you can think of it like a major mode, right?

00:14:52.160 --> 00:14:54.439
Well, more like a global mode,

00:14:54.440 --> 00:14:57.960
sorry. That's a global mode of Emacs commands,

00:14:57.961 --> 00:14:59.360
or something like that.

00:14:59.361 --> 00:15:01.519
In general, the feeling is really close.

00:15:01.520 --> 00:15:05.919
So you will tell that it's really close to how both work,

00:15:05.920 --> 00:15:07.839
similar commands, and that shows.

00:15:07.840 --> 00:15:12.359
Differences, Common Lisp is not Emacs Lisp,

00:15:12.360 --> 00:15:13.919
it's similar in the surface.

00:15:13.920 --> 00:15:16.279
So it uses `defun`, you know, have parentheses

00:15:16.280 --> 00:15:18.719
and yada, yada, but it's not the same language, really,

00:15:18.720 --> 00:15:20.839
and sometimes you will find

00:15:20.840 --> 00:15:22.639
that the differences are substantial.

00:15:23.260 --> 00:15:24.859
The internals are completely different,

00:15:24.860 --> 00:15:27.479
of course, nothing, well, completely.

00:15:27.480 --> 00:15:29.719
They have a buffer implementation and other things,

00:15:29.720 --> 00:15:32.359
but in general, yeah, aside from that,

00:15:32.360 --> 00:15:34.079
it's completely different.

00:15:34.080 --> 00:15:36.199
And it's true that GNU Emacs

00:15:36.200 --> 00:15:37.479
has a better documentation tutorial.

00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:39.719
So GNU Emacs for me, I think it's

00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:41.759
one of the best-documented software ever.

00:15:41.760 --> 00:15:49.599
We're trying to go there, but we're still not there.

NOTE Demo

00:15:49.600 --> 00:15:54.079
Let's do the demo. So to open Lem, you compile it,

00:15:54.080 --> 00:15:55.759
and then you have it available,

00:15:55.760 --> 00:15:57.719
and you open Lem. As you can see,

00:15:57.720 --> 00:16:00.839
we have the temporary buffer. On the top left is the mode--

00:16:00.840 --> 00:16:03.279
not mode,

00:16:03.280 --> 00:16:07.239
the beam, insert, normal, visual. This is the V mode, right?

00:16:07.240 --> 00:16:10.279
In the top right corner, we have fundamental,

00:16:10.280 --> 00:16:11.599
which is the major mode, then paredit,

00:16:11.600 --> 00:16:15.079
which is like the minor mode, but you know,

00:16:15.080 --> 00:16:16.079
this is like the paredit for Emacs.

00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:19.199
In the top left buffer,

00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:22.479
you have the current buffer.

00:16:22.480 --> 00:16:26.479
So let's open the... Emacs, we all know how to do this.

00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:29.319
This is a command, like explore this command,

00:16:29.320 --> 00:16:31.479
like `open-init-file`. This opens the init file,

00:16:31.480 --> 00:16:34.319
which is in this directory, in `~/.lem/init.lisp`.

00:16:34.320 --> 00:16:38.239
As you can see, this is very similar, right?

00:16:38.240 --> 00:16:40.279
You define a command, which is not interactive,

00:16:40.280 --> 00:16:42.959
and then you get the buffer, right?

00:16:42.960 --> 00:16:44.919
This is a... So my personal command...

00:16:44.920 --> 00:16:48.879
Let's go to the one that I just opened. Init file, right?

00:16:48.880 --> 00:16:52.159
So this is a command that I did,

00:16:52.160 --> 00:16:53.439
which is `find-file`.

00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:56.599
This is very similar to [??], but just `find-file`.

00:16:56.600 --> 00:16:58.399
As you can see, very similar.

00:16:58.400 --> 00:17:01.759
This is the way that you program in Lem.

00:17:01.760 --> 00:17:04.839
This is the major mode, which is Lisp,

00:17:04.840 --> 00:17:06.959
that we're seeing at the top, right?

00:17:06.960 --> 00:17:10.479
And we can connect if we `slime-self-connect`.

00:17:10.480 --> 00:17:14.119
This is the prompt. This is the REPL.

00:17:14.120 --> 00:17:17.959
So if we... Keep in mind that this is Common Lisp,

00:17:17.960 --> 00:17:20.439
so this has different things.

00:17:20.440 --> 00:17:22.719
So we have to go to the Lem package,

00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:26.199
which is very important. This has namespaces, right?

00:17:26.200 --> 00:17:29.039
It's not the same. And we can say, okay,

00:17:29.040 --> 00:17:32.319
`current-buffer`. We get the buffer.

00:17:32.320 --> 00:17:35.199
We can explore everything that is in it, right?

00:17:35.200 --> 00:17:38.559
We have all this stuff. This is... If you're familiar

00:17:38.560 --> 00:17:41.159
with SLIME or Sly, this is it.

00:17:41.160 --> 00:17:46.279
It's just that we can say, buffer, I think it's `buffer-name`.

00:17:46.280 --> 00:17:49.159
Yes. And we can take this,

00:17:49.160 --> 00:17:50.799
and then we'll give you the name.

00:17:50.800 --> 00:17:54.359
So as you can see, the development experience

00:17:54.360 --> 00:17:57.639
is really powerful. We can also `lisp-scratch`,

00:17:57.640 --> 00:18:00.679
which transform... basically apply

00:18:00.680 --> 00:18:02.639
the major mode of Lisp to the temporary buffer.

00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:06.719
This is very similar to Emacs.

00:18:06.720 --> 00:18:11.999
Let's go back to the theme. I think that's it.

00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:13.879
Thank you all very much for listening to me.

00:18:13.880 --> 00:18:15.239
I think I point out

00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:16.999
the Emacsen family is really interesting.

00:18:17.000 --> 00:18:19.279
Lisp is really good, and GNU Emacs is really good,

00:18:19.280 --> 00:18:21.199
and I think Lem is also pretty awesome.

00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:23.119
So thank you all very much.

00:18:23.120 --> 00:18:27.560
I'll be answering the question now. And happy hacking.