WEBVTT
00:00.000 --> 00:08.160
Okay, so we seem to be back. Sorry for the little shuffling chairs around. We are now live with
00:08.160 --> 00:16.400
Sid. Hi, Sid. Let me contextualize a little bit for the people because we are on Gen right now
00:16.400 --> 00:00:18.620
and the talk was happening on Dev.
NOTE Short recap of what the talk was about?
00:00:18.720 --> 00:00:22.800
Sid, can I ask you explaining what your talk was about in about
00:22.800 --> 00:28.560
one to two minutes? Yes, sure. The talk was called Maintaining the Maintainer's Attribution
00:28.560 --> 00:35.200
as a Model for Open Source Projects, and the idea is that instead of having an economic system based
00:35.200 --> 00:40.160
on supply and demand, which is capitalism, we have an economic system based on attribution
00:40.160 --> 00:47.120
and agreement, the power of our words, taking on incentives in the world, and that this can work
00:47.120 --> 00:52.240
for open source projects as a proving ground, and I think it can scale beyond that, and I hope it
00:52.240 --> 00:59.920
will scale beyond that in general. Okay, well I think you did, I'm not sure if you rehearsed
00:59.920 --> 01:05.040
this before, but that was such a perfect elevator speech for your talk. I am beyond amazed.
01:06.720 --> 01:10.960
Thank you, thank you. It's the adrenaline from being late and all the time zone shifting.
01:12.080 --> 01:19.920
You're not supposed to mention this, you know. You know, the things we keep telling people,
01:19.920 --> 01:24.560
you know, is that EmacsConf, yes, you see us rustling and being really grumpy when we don't
01:24.560 --> 01:30.640
get prereq, but really the live event is one part of EmacsConf, but really the better part of it is
01:30.640 --> 01:37.600
just having all the talks out of the head of people online, easily viewable, easily accessible
01:37.600 --> 01:42.000
with subtitles and stuff like this. So don't worry, it's fine if you're all right for submitting a
01:42.000 --> 01:46.720
prereq, it's fine if you don't show up to the Q&A, eventually we will find you, we will ask you the
01:46.720 --> 01:51.840
questions and all the data will be out there, so don't worry about it. Yeah, the magic of editing
01:51.840 --> 01:57.360
and stuff like that, you know. Yes, but we don't have it now, so we'll have to stick, you know,
01:57.360 --> 02:02.800
time is going to dilute, we'll have to stick with strict adherence to chronology right now. So
02:02.800 --> 02:07.680
starting with Sid, do you want to take the first question on the pad? Okay, let's look at them.
NOTE What's the incentive to pay?
02:09.280 --> 02:14.960
So the first question is, this seems to assume that there will be money contributions commensured
02:14.960 --> 02:20.400
with the value of the project versus everyone freeloading because there's no incentive to pay.
02:21.840 --> 02:26.400
Right, so actually there is an incentive to pay, so I think what the question is referring to
02:26.400 --> 02:32.720
is that everyone is going to pay to other projects, or no one is going to pay to projects because
02:32.720 --> 02:38.080
they're free anyway and you can use them and you don't have to pay, but one of the new things
02:38.080 --> 02:43.920
with attribution-based economics is the idea that in open source projects we agree, we all
02:43.920 --> 02:50.400
collectively agree on a fair market price for a project, and this isn't a price in the sense that
02:50.400 --> 02:55.200
you are prohibited from using the product until you pay the price, but rather it's for an accounting
02:55.200 --> 02:59.920
purpose, which is that if you pay more than that price, then that means you are now an investor,
03:00.480 --> 03:06.080
and so you can sort of, that means you are now attributable in future revenues that come to the
03:06.080 --> 03:11.520
project. So if you think there's a project that's going to do some nice things, you can essentially
03:11.520 --> 03:16.160
buy shares in it, except these are not ownership shares, they're shares and attribution because
03:16.160 --> 03:22.240
you contribute value by contributing money and that's attributable, so there is an incentive
03:22.240 --> 03:30.720
to pay, and I think, but also beyond this, the financial model is incredibly complex,
03:30.720 --> 03:36.160
it is much simpler than what we have today in a capitalist world, but still finance is a very
03:36.160 --> 03:43.040
complex thing, and I think we're in the very very early stages of figuring out the financial model,
03:43.040 --> 03:48.480
and I think there's a number, there's tons of open questions, needs a lot of help from people
03:49.520 --> 03:56.480
to figure these out, so there's promising angles here, but I think we have a lot to work out as
03:56.480 --> 04:03.360
well. Should I go to the second question? Yeah, feel free to do so, you are the master, you're
04:03.360 --> 00:04:03.914
in Q&A.
NOTE What do you think of projects like OpenQ?
00:04:04.014 --> 00:04:11.040
Okay, so the second question is, are you aware of projects like OpenQ, would that fit the
04:11.040 --> 04:18.960
model in your opinion? I'm actually not familiar with OpenQ, so maybe I should just move on to the
04:18.960 --> 00:04:23.205
next question and come back to that if we have time. Sure.
NOTE Are you aware of SourceCred?
00:04:23.305 --> 00:04:25.840
The next one says, I see incredible
04:25.840 --> 04:30.800
amounts of overlap with the source cred system, where attribution of antecedents, graph of
04:30.800 --> 04:36.640
contributions, fair in hindsight, backpropagation. Oh, backpropagation, interesting. I'm sensing a
04:36.640 --> 04:40.560
pattern though, so you are being exposed to stuff that you do not know, which is amazing, that
04:40.560 --> 04:45.760
brings an opportunity to do research later on, but feel free to delay those questions until,
04:45.760 --> 04:49.920
perhaps, I would invite the people who ask those questions in the pad maybe to describe in a little
04:49.920 --> 04:55.520
blurb that Sid can read, what is the meaning of those particular platforms, and in the meantime,
04:55.520 --> 05:00.000
Sid, you can move on to the next questions. Sure, but I will say one thing on the subject of both
05:00.000 --> 05:07.200
of these things, which is that I think it's significantly underappreciated the extent to which
05:07.200 --> 05:13.040
value is created in the world that is both independently created of other value that happens
05:13.040 --> 05:20.720
to be very similar, as well as dependently related and that may be unknown, and this is something
05:20.720 --> 05:26.720
that I call subliminal transmission, which is like if you think about a turbulent flow,
05:26.720 --> 05:30.800
you know, and that's what our world is, you know, we like to have all these linear narratives and
05:30.800 --> 05:37.840
simple stories where I think if you take all of Wikipedia, right, even a single person's life
05:37.840 --> 05:42.240
has more information and richness than all of Wikipedia, so when you think about it in those
05:42.240 --> 05:47.920
terms, you realize just how small our stories are in expressing what really happens and what has
05:47.920 --> 05:53.040
really happened in the world, so from that perspective, I think there's this thing called
05:53.040 --> 05:58.720
subliminal transmission, which is like a turbulent flow where you have little vortices that appear
05:58.720 --> 06:02.480
here and then they disappear, they're gone, but then you see them again here and they're like
06:02.480 --> 06:05.600
bigger, but they're the same, and then you see them in a different place and they're not the
06:05.600 --> 06:11.440
same, they're different, yet somehow the same, and I think our world is like that, and if we have
06:11.440 --> 06:16.960
an economic system that's capable of not saying that, oh, it should be this other way, which it
06:16.960 --> 06:22.480
isn't, but in fact we see this is how it is, let's make sure that we recognize this and empower the
06:22.480 --> 06:29.440
right voices, given that this is how the world is, and from that perspective, I think projects like
06:29.440 --> 06:34.320
OpenQ and SourceCred and any number of others might exist which are creating value in the world,
06:34.320 --> 06:39.360
and I think that we all deserve to be empowered, you know, if we're creating similar kinds of
06:39.360 --> 06:44.320
value, then these are voices that have something useful to say for us moving forward, and they
06:44.320 --> 06:50.640
deserve to be empowered, so yeah, it doesn't have to be causally related, you know, you can have
06:50.640 --> 06:56.080
empowerment of all of these different projects because they work together, so yeah, very long
06:56.080 --> 07:00.720
-winded answer to a short question, or non-question, meta-question.
07:00.720 --> 07:04.480
You're fine, you can be as long-winded as you want, because honestly you have been so
07:04.480 --> 07:10.080
eloquent in your answer, and the little ingestors that accompany these little vertices
07:11.440 --> 07:15.520
do carry on with as much velocity as you want. We will be going until about
07:15.520 --> 07:20.880
52-53 of the current hours, which means we have about 20 more minutes. Also, we have a lot of
07:20.880 --> 07:25.600
questions in the pad, so I would prefer if Sid started answering the questions over the pad first,
07:25.600 --> 07:30.400
but we are going to be opening the pad in about six to seven minutes if you want to join and ask
07:30.400 --> 07:35.520
questions live to Sid, but in the meantime, Sid, sorry, I'm getting tired, it's late, in the meantime,
07:35.520 --> 00:07:39.789
Sid, feel free to answer more questions. Sure, okay, thank you.
NOTE How is this different from money?
00:07:39.889 --> 00:07:41.280
The next question is,
07:41.280 --> 07:46.480
how is this different from money? Not in some abstract ownership versus attribution way.
07:46.480 --> 07:52.000
Open-source funding is an incentive problem, which this does not change as far as I can see.
07:54.000 --> 08:00.960
So, on the one hand, it does add new incentives, as we talked about. I'm not sure about the question
08:00.960 --> 08:06.800
of how this is different from money. This isn't proposing to replace money in any way.
08:06.800 --> 08:13.920
Rather, it employs money as, you know, the mechanism by which we recognize value. I think
08:13.920 --> 08:23.440
money is perhaps something that can be revisited and, you know, reflected upon in the future,
08:23.440 --> 08:28.960
but I don't think we need to do that at this stage. At this stage, I'm content to rest on the
08:28.960 --> 08:33.520
black box abstractions of certain things that we've already developed, like money,
08:33.520 --> 08:37.600
as a means of exchange and as a means of recognizing value, and I think we can use that,
08:37.600 --> 08:43.440
so I'm not trying to replace money. Open-source funding is an incentive program. This doesn't
08:43.440 --> 08:47.680
change incentives, so I think we already covered how it does add incentives in the sense that you
08:47.680 --> 08:53.520
can invest in open-source projects, which is a new incentive, and, you know, we also talked about
08:53.520 --> 08:58.080
how there are some unopened questions. I'm not sure if this is one of them.
NOTE How would you approach a viable experiment for ABE?
08:58.080 --> 09:07.680
How would you approach a viable experiment? So, the prototype that we have, that we talked about
09:07.680 --> 09:13.760
in the talk, so there's a prototype, for those who didn't watch the talk. We have an open-source
09:14.560 --> 09:19.520
project, you know, it's a GitHub action, and, you know, I love to support other platforms. I'm not
09:19.520 --> 09:24.960
married to GitHub in any way. I don't have any special affection for GitHub. I don't have any
09:24.960 --> 09:31.520
special affection for GitHub. But it's a GitHub action at the moment, and what it will do is,
09:31.520 --> 09:37.120
when you follow all of the processes in the Constitution, which says, you know,
09:37.120 --> 09:43.360
open-source repository, create an issue that solicits related work reports from members of
09:43.360 --> 09:49.600
the public, and then create this folder structure which has a report of the contributors and this
09:49.600 --> 09:55.440
and that, once you do all of that, like initial logistical work, this GitHub action will process
09:55.440 --> 10:00.720
fresh payments that come in, which you report as single line item files, text files. Everything is
10:00.720 --> 10:07.360
text input and output, and then, you know, you can basically get all the accounting done for you by
10:07.360 --> 10:14.960
this system. So, that's what the nature of the experiment is, and I think we're starting with
10:14.960 --> 10:19.840
just one or two repos, because there's tremendous number of unresolved questions, and it's all going
10:19.840 --> 10:27.360
to be resolved through dialogue, agreement. We all decide how this thing works, and I think,
10:27.360 --> 00:10:33.899
you know, there's, yeah, so we'll see about how the experiment goes.
NOTE How do you constrain the cognitive and time burdens of deciding the values of attributed contributions?
00:10:33.999 --> 00:10:36.400
Next question, given that
10:36.400 --> 10:45.040
oversight is a social process, how do you constrain the cognitive and time burdens of deciding the
10:45.040 --> 10:54.080
values of attributed contributions? Okay, this is a great question. So, first of all, you know,
10:54.080 --> 11:00.080
let's talk about long-term vision, right? Long-term vision, I don't imagine that any of us, that is,
11:00.080 --> 11:04.160
the actual contributors to the projects, are going to have to worry about this at all.
11:04.160 --> 11:08.240
We're not going to have to engage in this process of what is called dialectical inheritance
11:08.240 --> 11:13.440
attribution, which is, you know, it's a lot of work. There's all these standards and precedents,
11:13.440 --> 11:18.800
and how do you compare ideas versus works versus the materials that went into the project? It's a
11:18.800 --> 11:24.400
very hard problem, and I think it's something we'll be improving upon for possibly even decades.
11:25.200 --> 11:30.000
But at that stage, I believe there will be experts, much like today's investment bankers
11:30.000 --> 11:36.400
and lawyers, investment IP lawyers. These are the people who are going to specialize in it,
11:36.400 --> 11:40.880
going to be professionals, and that's the kind of work that they're going to do, and we can leave it
11:40.880 --> 11:48.000
to them. But at this stage, yes, we have to do it. We have to set these principles and standards in
11:48.000 --> 11:55.840
place. And how do we constrain that? We start with simple heuristics. So, initially, we want to have,
11:55.840 --> 11:59.680
you know, if you can imagine, this is, I don't know, this is probably a bad metaphor, but if you have,
11:59.680 --> 12:07.040
like, a big hole and you're trying to patch it, you know, if you put, like, little tiny things on
12:07.040 --> 12:12.240
it and try to focus on little tiny things, okay, what I'm trying to say is order of magnitude,
12:12.240 --> 12:19.280
right? Let's solve the problem at the first order of magnitude and then get the little harmonics
12:19.280 --> 12:27.520
and, like, solve those over time. So, basically, we want to have usable, workable heuristics that
12:27.520 --> 12:33.760
are low maintenance that solve the majority of the problem for our immediate purposes and then
12:33.760 --> 12:40.960
iterate on those over time and develop proper models, which I think we will start to do in the
12:40.960 --> 12:47.040
next phase. The initial phase is heuristics that are easy and low maintenance and useful.
12:47.040 --> 12:53.600
Right, Sid, I just want to barge in a little bit. I just want to let people know that we have opened
12:53.600 --> 13:00.000
up the Q&A BBB window right now, so the same spiel as usual. If you want to join Sid and ask questions
13:00.000 --> 13:04.160
directly, we still have some questions in the pad. Don't worry, Sid will get to them first.
13:04.160 --> 13:09.040
But if you want to join and have a discussion with Sid, we have until about, we've got about
13:09.040 --> 13:14.240
20, 18 minutes left of discussion there. So, please do not hesitate. This is a very interesting talk.
13:14.240 --> 13:19.840
We have a very interesting speaker as well. So, use this opportunity, please. In the meantime,
13:19.840 --> 13:24.720
Sid, you can answer more questions. Sure. Should we take one from the field?
13:25.360 --> 13:28.080
I guess while people are thinking about it, I'll take one more question, maybe.
NOTE How are the attribution amounts calculated?
13:29.360 --> 13:37.440
Okay. So, the next question is, how are the attribution amounts calculated?
13:37.440 --> 13:42.960
Okay, how are the attribution amounts calculated? This is going to be done through standards.
13:42.960 --> 13:49.040
So, there is a, there's a repo, you know, if you go to the github.org account, dream-org,
13:49.040 --> 13:57.760
d-r-y-m-dash-org-slash-foundation. This contains the founding documents of how we will manage this
13:57.760 --> 14:04.080
process. And it can, it is, it will contain more standards. It has a few at the moment, very high
14:04.080 --> 14:10.240
level ones, but we will keep adding more standards there that are general enough to be universally
14:10.240 --> 14:16.880
applicable, and that can be specialized to the individual projects. And the attribution is going
14:16.880 --> 14:22.400
to be decided by these standards, by the members of the public, members of the community.
14:22.400 --> 14:28.240
Yeah. And they calculate, they must add up to 100%. So, it's, you know, and that's okay, actually,
14:28.240 --> 14:36.080
I should say. One of the mechanisms by which attribution will be done initially is this heuristic
14:36.080 --> 14:45.040
procedure called the Analyze, Appraise, Anonymize Attribute Loop. What that means is we first
14:45.040 --> 14:49.600
analyze the project, decompose it into its components, and we can do any number of such
14:49.600 --> 14:53.280
analyses, any number of people can do these analyses, and there can be a decision procedure
14:53.280 --> 14:58.320
for combining them. But that, I digress. We'll keep it simple first. We analyze the project into its
14:58.320 --> 15:05.520
components, then we agree on the proportion of value contributed by each of those components,
15:05.520 --> 15:10.480
then we analyze the activities done by the contributors, and then we analyze the
15:10.480 --> 15:15.120
activities done by the contributors and anonymize them. And we say, this was done, this was done,
15:15.120 --> 15:20.240
this was done, this was done. This is how much proportion of value these activities contribute
15:20.240 --> 15:24.720
to each of these components. And then once you have this chart, this graph of all of these
15:24.720 --> 15:32.880
connections and proportions of value, then you anonymize and you aggregate the sum of proportions
15:32.880 --> 15:38.480
of value by contributor. And contributor is not necessarily a person, a contributor is a
15:38.480 --> 15:45.040
project, it can be an antecedent, it doesn't have to be a direct contributor to the project,
15:45.040 --> 15:50.160
it doesn't have to be someone who wrote code, it can be a person who created a bug report,
15:50.160 --> 15:57.200
or a person who had a good idea for the design. And anyway, so once you do this, you aggregate
15:57.200 --> 16:02.800
by contributor, you have a set of proportions that total up to one, or a set of percentages
16:02.800 --> 16:09.920
that total up to 100, that dictate how the revenues that come into the project are to
16:09.920 --> 16:21.760
be divided amongst all of these antecedents and contributors. Let's see, what's the next question?
16:22.800 --> 16:26.240
Okay, the next question is being written down as we speak.
16:26.240 --> 00:16:29.720
It's fine, we can wait a little bit.
NOTE Synchronicity with Bastien's talk last year
00:16:29.820 --> 00:16:33.200
In the meantime, I'll just mention,
16:35.360 --> 16:41.360
so actually, when we keep track of presentation for Emacs, we do have slugs for them. And this
16:41.360 --> 16:47.440
year, the slug for your talk, Sid, was made. And it was not an anodyne choice, because last year,
16:47.440 --> 16:53.360
we also had another talk by a maintainer, or well, the org maintainer, or one of the org maintainers,
16:53.360 --> 16:59.520
Bastien Guerri. And it feels like Bastien's talk was mostly geared towards sustaining
16:59.520 --> 17:05.360
maintenance, and your is more about maintaining the software effort in general. And it feels like
17:05.360 --> 17:13.280
the two talks are related, but yours seems to be more, I wouldn't say visionary, I think they are
17:13.280 --> 17:17.120
very complimentary in nature. I'm not sure, have you been able to watch Bastien's talk from last
17:17.120 --> 17:22.080
year? I have not, but that sounds very interesting. I'll definitely check it out after this.
17:22.080 --> 17:27.360
Right. And I will now stop my blabbering, and you can answer the last question.
NOTE What are your assumptions about human nature?
17:28.960 --> 17:32.640
The last question is, what are your assumptions about human nature,
17:33.280 --> 17:42.000
vis-a-vis self-interest versus altruism? The funny thing is, I don't actually feel like
17:42.000 --> 17:50.000
we need to opine on that, from the perspective of an economic system. I mean, yes, we have to
17:50.000 --> 17:55.360
recognize that, you know, some people will say, oh, human nature is fundamentally selfish, or,
17:55.360 --> 18:00.320
you know, we have to be good, and we have to help each other. And I think both of these perspectives
18:00.320 --> 18:07.360
are not necessarily, you know, I don't know if they're necessarily the right way to think about
18:07.360 --> 18:13.040
it, because you have the idea about, well, capitalism assumes people are fundamentally
18:13.040 --> 18:17.840
selfish, or they have to act that way in order to be rational in the system. That's one side of it.
18:17.840 --> 18:22.800
The other side of it is this notion of altruism, right, that somehow you have to help others,
18:22.800 --> 18:28.320
and that, you know, there's like a charitable component, and you have all these people who
18:28.960 --> 18:33.520
make billions and billions of dollars, and then, you know, start giving that away. Which,
18:33.520 --> 18:36.880
you know, if you're going to make billions and billions of dollars, and you give it away,
18:36.880 --> 18:41.600
and like help the world, that's better than not giving it away and not helping the world.
18:41.600 --> 18:46.560
On the other hand, the fact that you got those billions and billions of dollars in a capitalist
18:46.560 --> 18:54.160
economic system, which fundamentally skews the value recognition in ways that, you know, is very,
18:54.160 --> 18:59.840
very subversive and very, very minimizing of the source, the true sources of value,
18:59.840 --> 19:06.160
means that you've led yourself to go down this path and essentially unwittingly and inevitably
19:06.160 --> 19:09.920
ended up causing a lot of problems, too. Like, it's not necessarily the case that if you're
19:09.920 --> 19:14.560
wealthy in a capitalist economy, that you've created a lot of value, because yes, you have,
19:14.560 --> 19:19.040
but at the same time, the net value is not guaranteed to be above zero, really,
19:20.320 --> 19:27.040
because capitalism can't express all forms of value. So I don't think thinking about self-interest
19:27.040 --> 19:35.680
versus altruism is the right way to think about things from the perspective of economic systems.
19:35.680 --> 19:42.480
In an economic system where the incentives are so set up that the maximum value to all
19:42.480 --> 19:47.840
is recognized the most, then it's inevitable that people want to do that. And it doesn't mean that
19:47.840 --> 19:51.280
you're a naturalistic person or a selfish person. You're just going to do it because there are
19:51.280 --> 20:00.240
incentives that are set up that way that everybody agreed on. And I think in such a system, your own
20:00.240 --> 20:07.040
sort of spiritual inclinations towards this are secondary. Not secondary. I don't want to say
20:07.040 --> 20:14.800
secondary. I want to say that they are up to you. And your actions in the world will be rewarded to
20:14.800 --> 20:20.320
the extent that you help others. The more you give, the more you will be empowered. So from
20:20.320 --> 20:25.280
that perspective, you could say that the system rewards altruism. But at the same time, if you're
20:25.280 --> 20:32.320
just giving and you're not in a position where... I mean, the system ensures that if you give,
20:32.320 --> 20:36.560
you're also taken care of, so that you don't have to choose between altruism and selfishness.
20:36.560 --> 20:44.160
Altruism is empowering yourself. So that's kind of the beauty of this system, really. That's the
20:44.160 --> 20:50.240
beauty of an attribution-based system is that you become more empowered by giving more. But we don't
20:50.240 --> 20:54.880
have to get into the spirituality stuff of it, really. It's beside the point as far as the
20:54.880 --> 21:02.400
mechanisms of the economic system go. All right. I think that was the last question, unless I'm
21:02.400 --> 21:09.920
mistaken. That's the last one I see. Yes. Well, you did a fine job answering, however, many
21:09.920 --> 21:15.920
questions before. Again, very lengthy, as you said, but very eloquent, as I will say to you.
NOTE What is the URL of the project?
21:17.680 --> 21:22.080
There is one question that appeared on ISE, which was the URL of the project. You mentioned
21:22.080 --> 21:27.520
dream.org. Would you be able to maybe type it out in the chat so that people can
21:27.520 --> 21:32.640
check it, and I'll place it on ISE for the person that was asking? Or on BBB, it's fine, too.
21:34.000 --> 21:41.520
It's actually dream-org. Oh, that's why I did dream.org, which was the problem.
21:43.840 --> 00:21:44.902
It's the GitHub repo.
NOTE Check out the prototype, "Old Abe"
00:21:45.002 --> 00:21:47.280
And actually, sorry, you should also check out
21:48.480 --> 21:55.840
dream-org.old-abe. That is the billing prototype, which is the GitHub action,
21:55.840 --> 22:01.520
which you can add to your repo. And it's got all the startup instructions for how you can
22:01.520 --> 22:08.720
set up attribution-based economics. So I'll let you type it out. github.com slash dream
22:10.480 --> 22:18.080
dash org slash old-abe.
22:18.080 --> 22:25.280
It's good for you for remembering it. I will place this in BBB right now. Sorry,
22:25.280 --> 00:22:29.420
not in BBB, in the pad so that people can click on it.
NOTE Closing Remarks
00:22:29.520 --> 00:22:32.640
Sid, is there anything else you'd like to
22:32.640 --> 22:41.200
say? We are about at the end of the Q&A right now. I guess attribution-based economics is open for
22:41.200 --> 22:50.560
business, as it were. So if you can go to some of the repos at the dream-org GitHub org account,
22:51.280 --> 22:56.240
many of those repos are starting attribution-based economics. And simx.el in particular is one for
22:56.240 --> 23:00.560
the Emacs community. So I encourage you guys. And of course, old-abe, that's another one that
23:00.560 --> 23:04.560
started. And that's the only one that's actually ready to accept payments and distribute payments,
23:04.560 --> 23:09.120
because we have done the attributions already, given that it was written in the last few days.
23:09.120 --> 23:16.480
But the other ones, we might start payments out, I think, on January 1. So between now and January
23:16.480 --> 23:24.480
1, we'll start doing the attribution process and deciding the antecedents, who's owed what,
23:24.480 --> 23:28.080
what proportion of value came from whom, and all that stuff between now and then. And then we're
23:28.080 --> 23:36.880
going to start paying out from the repositories January 1 is the plan. If you can contribute to
23:36.880 --> 23:41.280
these projects, then that would help prove the model out, and that would create incentives for
23:41.280 --> 23:45.920
people to join. So I encourage you to do so. Thank you. Well, thank you. You've definitely
23:45.920 --> 23:50.320
made a very nice case for it, and people can make their own minds now by checking the link.
NOTE A flicker of light and following your curiosity
23:50.320 --> 23:55.280
We really encourage you to follow up on a lot of the talks. It's one thing. One thing that we always
23:55.280 --> 24:02.080
say with Sasha to the people, be they speakers, be they user group members, is that Emacs can't,
24:02.080 --> 24:08.000
and user groups, any kind of community activity for Emacs is about curiosity. And it's one thing
24:08.000 --> 24:14.960
to ignite the flame of curiosity in some peoples. It's actually much better to actually follow the
24:14.960 --> 24:19.120
fuse and see where it leads you. Because, you know, it's a little fuse, a little tiny flame,
24:19.120 --> 24:24.000
a flicker of a flame, a flicker of light going in a direction that might explode so much curiosity
24:24.000 --> 24:32.960
later down the line. I was talking earlier with Blaine about, you know, oh, last year he was
24:32.960 --> 24:39.280
presenting, it had only been six, it had only been, I can't speak English, it's 10.45 a.m. in
24:39.280 --> 24:46.000
my time zone. I'm starting to tire. But he had only started using Emacs six months prior to
24:46.000 --> 24:51.040
presenting, and he was already so proficient in it. And it feels like, it's kind of like in Lost,
24:51.040 --> 24:55.280
you know, when you have the rope and you pull on the rope and it brings you so far away. Well,
24:55.280 --> 25:01.200
do follow this curiosity, be it for what Sid has presented to you today, but for any of the topics
25:01.200 --> 25:04.960
that we've presented to you today. So thank you so much, Sid, for all your time, all your
25:04.960 --> 25:09.280
presentation, and your answers. Thank you so much, Leo. Appreciate it. Thanks for having me.
