summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/2020/subtitles/emacsconf-2020--35-waveing-at-repetitive-repetitive-repetitive-music-zmusic--questions--zachary-kanfer.vtt
blob: c60bd115d48137a6c6e4feeb4e60a5eb11cfcfd1 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
WEBVTT

00:00:02.800 --> 00:00:09.200
I can, yes.

00:00:09.200 --> 00:00:13.120
Okay, yeah, so I'm Zachary Kanfer,

00:00:13.120 --> 00:00:14.920
let's go to the

00:00:14.920 --> 00:00:17.520
questions. The first question, "Why

00:00:17.520 --> 00:00:19.119
do we go top to bottom for time

00:00:19.119 --> 00:00:19.840
progression,

00:00:19.840 --> 00:00:23.920
and left to right for low to high?"

00:00:23.920 --> 00:00:27.279
Interesting, I think…, so the initial

00:00:27.279 --> 00:00:30.000
thing I was copying, that initial app

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:35.280
work this way, and

00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:36.960
yeah, I mean, certainly traditional music,

00:00:36.960 --> 00:00:38.960
you know, on a staff

00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:43.040
does go left to right like this.

00:00:43.040 --> 00:00:46.000
I mean, going top to bottom does make

00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:47.440
it easier to add more beats without

00:00:47.440 --> 00:00:48.960
having to wrap, but certainly that could

00:00:48.960 --> 00:00:49.920
be managed.

00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:52.239
Yeah, I had not really thought about

00:00:52.239 --> 00:00:53.760
it, but it is definitely something worth

00:00:53.760 --> 00:00:55.199
looking into.

00:00:55.199 --> 00:01:02.480
Yeah.

00:01:02.480 --> 00:01:05.680
Ah, good point, thank you. Let me go ahead

00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:06.960
and do that.

00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:14.240
The entire screen…

00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:16.880
Okay, so the screen share should be

00:01:16.880 --> 00:01:18.320
starting,

00:01:18.320 --> 00:01:21.439
there we go. Cool, all right.

00:01:21.439 --> 00:01:24.880
Two, "Will you play us another song?" Not

00:01:24.880 --> 00:01:26.640
now, I can make some recordings of

00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:28.080
it, or certainly you can try it.

00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:30.720
I couldn't quite get the

00:01:30.720 --> 00:01:33.119
microphone and the webcam and everything

00:01:33.119 --> 00:01:37.040
to work with the sound playing now. So,

00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:40.079
I can record some. Also, please…

00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:43.520
I have put a link at the… here in the

00:01:43.520 --> 00:01:46.640
Etherpad, zck.org/emacsconf2020 [updated],

00:01:46.640 --> 00:01:48.479
where you can go and get the source,

00:01:48.479 --> 00:01:49.920
and you can try it yourself. There's

00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:51.920
no dependencies needed, so it's just all

00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:54.560
in Emacs. So, please, you know, try it

00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:57.040
yourself.

00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:00.079
"Any chance for an Emacs tracker or mod

00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:01.040
player?"

00:02:01.040 --> 00:02:03.680
I don't really know what a mod player

00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:04.479
or tracker

00:02:04.479 --> 00:02:08.000
are, but I mean, I'm sure

00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:09.679
that would be cool, maybe there's one

00:02:09.679 --> 00:02:11.599
on now, but I don't know.

00:02:11.599 --> 00:02:13.920
My musical background. So, I've played

00:02:13.920 --> 00:02:15.200
various instruments since about the

00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:15.840
third grade.

00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:18.160
Started recorder, play cello, I play

00:02:18.160 --> 00:02:19.520
guitar now.

00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:22.560
But yeah, so just kind of random

00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:23.680
instruments, and

00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:26.959
I guess kind of some of those

00:02:26.959 --> 00:02:27.280
things

00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:30.480
influence how I think about music.

00:02:33.519 --> 00:02:35.360
"Are there any open source musical

00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:36.640
management sample libraries that could

00:02:36.640 --> 00:02:37.840
be used?"

00:02:37.840 --> 00:02:41.200
Good question, I'm sure there are, I

00:02:41.200 --> 00:02:42.400
don't know any of that integrate really

00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:43.360
well with Emacs.

00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:44.560
One of the cool things that I liked

00:02:44.560 --> 00:02:45.680
about this is that there are no

00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:47.440
dependencies,

00:02:47.440 --> 00:02:49.360
you know, you don't need any external

00:02:49.360 --> 00:02:50.800
program to

00:02:50.800 --> 00:02:53.040
generate the music. I mean, it does

00:02:53.040 --> 00:02:54.160
shell out to

00:02:54.160 --> 00:02:57.280
to play, but that

00:02:57.280 --> 00:02:58.640
should be able to be done on any

00:02:58.640 --> 00:02:59.840
operating system, as always, you have

00:02:59.840 --> 00:03:03.519
something that can play WAVE files,

00:03:03.519 --> 00:03:05.599
but yeah, it is interesting to kind of

00:03:05.599 --> 00:03:10.000
try the different sounds and different

00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:12.239
tones that you could get with

00:03:12.239 --> 00:03:14.400
different instruments.

00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:16.959
Have I written any actual songs?

00:03:16.959 --> 00:03:21.040
Nothing super

00:03:21.040 --> 00:03:23.680
well put together, I kind of just

00:03:23.680 --> 00:03:25.519
been playing around with this.

00:03:25.519 --> 00:03:27.440
It's kind of… making this was one of

00:03:27.440 --> 00:03:29.040
those things where once I made it, I

00:03:29.040 --> 00:03:30.080
was like, okay,

00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:31.280
now I can play with it, and I did a

00:03:31.280 --> 00:03:32.720
little bit, and was like, I don't know if

00:03:32.720 --> 00:03:33.920
I feel like it right now.

00:03:33.920 --> 00:03:37.280
You know, which I've found that to

00:03:37.280 --> 00:03:38.720
be the case with some things that I've

00:03:38.720 --> 00:03:39.599
implemented

00:03:39.599 --> 00:03:41.360
in Emacs where it's… I make it, and then

00:03:41.360 --> 00:03:43.519
it's the kind of some of the desire to

00:03:43.519 --> 00:03:44.480
use it all the time

00:03:44.480 --> 00:03:46.879
goes away, but I'm sure I'll circle back

00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:47.760
around

00:03:47.760 --> 00:03:51.040
at some point especially kind of maybe

00:03:51.040 --> 00:03:52.400
once I add in different tones or

00:03:52.400 --> 00:03:54.640
something.

00:03:54.640 --> 00:03:56.400
I guess a similar question for

00:03:56.400 --> 00:03:57.840
pre-recorded sounds. Yeah, I mean,

00:03:57.840 --> 00:04:01.120
if it's… part of what I did, what I wrote

00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:02.080
was a

00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:04.720
WAVE generation library, so, if you kind

00:04:04.720 --> 00:04:06.720
of have the data,

00:04:06.720 --> 00:04:08.400
you could use those and chop them

00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:10.159
up and take certain lengths of them

00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:13.360
and make a WAVE file, so it's not plug and

00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:14.959
play right now, but you could certainly

00:04:14.959 --> 00:04:19.120
add those notes to do it.

00:04:19.120 --> 00:04:22.720
"Any MIDI mapping possibilities?"

00:04:22.720 --> 00:04:24.560
I haven't looked into it, but I'm sure

00:04:24.560 --> 00:04:26.160
you definitely could output to MIDI

00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:28.800
which is another benefit of having

00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:30.400
that multiple layers with the top layer

00:04:30.400 --> 00:04:31.520
is just,

00:04:31.520 --> 00:04:33.360
you know, if the root note is this,

00:04:33.360 --> 00:04:35.120
we're just two semitones up or seven

00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:36.560
semitones up or whatever it is.

00:04:36.560 --> 00:04:38.160
It should be relatively simple to

00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:40.720
kind of switch out that layer underneath

00:04:40.720 --> 00:04:44.479
from WAVE to MIDI or other things.

00:04:44.479 --> 00:04:45.759
"What were some of the challenges with

00:04:45.759 --> 00:04:47.520
writing a special mode for Emacs?"

00:04:47.520 --> 00:04:49.759
Interested in getting into this, not

00:04:49.759 --> 00:04:51.040
sure where to start.

00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:54.960
There… yeah, it so…

00:04:54.960 --> 00:04:57.120
this isn't the first mode I've written,

00:04:57.120 --> 00:04:58.320
so that's right…,

00:04:58.320 --> 00:05:01.759
certainly that helps. I actually…

00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:05.600
I have a video that we recorded it

00:05:05.600 --> 00:05:08.240
as part of EmacsNYC on making a major

00:05:08.240 --> 00:05:09.039
mode.

00:05:09.039 --> 00:05:10.720
That's basically starts from

00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:12.639
nothing, and kind of builds up to

00:05:12.639 --> 00:05:15.680
an implementation of tic-tac-toe,

00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:17.039
but so it kind of goes into printing

00:05:17.039 --> 00:05:19.600
things out and buttons and making the

00:05:19.600 --> 00:05:21.280
mode.

00:05:21.280 --> 00:05:22.800
I mean, one of the best parts about Emacs

00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:24.560
is, because it's so

00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:26.479
configurable and so introspectible,

00:05:26.479 --> 00:05:28.479
you can start pretty simply,

00:05:28.479 --> 00:05:30.320
and just kind of ask Emacs about things,

00:05:30.320 --> 00:05:32.320
and then make one little

00:05:32.320 --> 00:05:34.960
change. It's really… it's not that bad,

00:05:34.960 --> 00:05:39.039
so, I'll try to throw a link up on that

00:05:39.039 --> 00:05:40.560
page I put up, or

00:05:40.560 --> 00:05:42.000
please email me for whoever asked this

00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:44.479
question to get a link to that video,

00:05:44.479 --> 00:05:46.240
or just look at the source

00:05:46.240 --> 00:05:47.919
code of this or any other major mode.

00:05:47.919 --> 00:05:50.479
Emacs makes it

00:05:50.479 --> 00:05:52.880
pretty easy to extend

00:05:52.880 --> 00:05:56.479
major modes. And I think that's

00:05:56.479 --> 00:05:57.600
the last question

00:05:57.600 --> 00:06:00.240
in the Etherpad, so, thanks so much

00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:02.479
everybody for coming.

00:06:04.033 --> 00:06:06.720
(Amin: Thank you so much

00:06:06.720 --> 00:06:09.039
to Zachary for your awesome talk,

00:06:09.039 --> 00:06:12.960
and for doing live questions.

00:06:12.960 --> 00:06:19.840
Thank you.) Thank you. (Amin: Cheers.)