[[!template id="chapters" vidid="mainVideo-hyperboleqa" data=""" 00:15.640 Q: I'm excited to know opinion on current state of using MCP and AI for PKM and PIEs. Since they do carry lot of burden out of us and ease lot of process. How does hyperbole stand with coming days? 02:54.200 Q: As a normal user who codes and takes notes, I really want to deep-dive and learn Hyperbole, but always end up winding back up to embark and org-mode being the better system. For me hyperbole looks like over-engineered (or over-configured) system which other individual packages do well. And outside emacs there is no system supporting hyperbole nor any usability. 05:13.640 Implicit buttons 06:43.840 Getting help 09:12.080 Explicit buttons 09:42.960 Homepage 11:41.540 Q: I've been using "activities.el" and "Bufferlo" to save dedicated workspaces (open buffers, window positions) in tabs and frames for tasks/projects across Emacs sessions. Could I do something similar with Hyperbole? 14:07.120 Q: How well do Hyperbole and org-mode work together? Is there any kind of integration? 16:16.400 Hywiki 22:06.440 Q: Are there any talks from this year's emacsconf that discussed things that would work well with Hyperbole? 26:05.840 Interesting, but the many different link formats makes reading and analyzing my notes much harder and less usable outside Emacs. 28:51.400 Koutliner 33:02.840 Org tables 34:43.280 Selecting between delimiters 36:43.080 Ace-window 38:01.200 Dired 38:42.240 Controlling windows or frames 40:04.960 Documentation 40:41.520 Videos 42:09.040 Manual """]]Duration: 47:09 minutes