[[!template id="chapters" vidid="literate-mainVideo" data=""" 00:00.000 Introduction 01:35.253 Do I still literate? 03:06.332 Advantages 04:28.720 Disadvantages 05:24.133 Ease of typing 06:24.720 Keep tangled code sync'd 07:22.501 Code evaluation 08:19.960 Has that block been eval'd? 09:05.239 Evaluating code in a subtree 09:26.872 Evaluating code from a distance 10:26.020 Navigating by headers 11:26.794 Navigating by function names 13:40.480 Why literate programming? 14:23.166 LP prose isn't comments 14:55.800 Summary """]]Duration: 15:51 minutes

[[!template id="chapters" vidid="literate-qanda" data=""" 02:07.400 Q: What's the largest code base you've ever tackled with the literate approach (esp. Emacs + Org-mode)? 03:58.080 Q: Have you ever used org-transclusion? 04:08.440 Q: What is your usage of dynamic blocks in such workflows? 04:48.840 Q: Is the minibuffer being deliberately hidden in this video? 05:17.341 Q: What's your take on Emacs+Org vs. Jupyter notebooks (for interactive programming)? 07:07.800 Q: Do you think any programming language is more suited to literate programming than another? 08:21.560 Q: Do you use inline org function calls and org babel library and such? 09:36.970 Q: How do you handle the cases where org markup may sometimes interfere with some of the code? 11:06.220 Q: You said at the start that literate didn't catch on in corporate DevOps - why not? 11:29.421 Q: Why not that full stack on Markdown? 12:22.120 Corwin's aside on orgvm 14:49.520 Org and Markdown fragmentation 16:17.920 Q: How does your management of "TODOs" (projects/tasks) interact with this literate mindset, any insightful things you do on that front? 17:30.630 Q: Do you LP also on larger projects? 18:38.936 Q: Have you used Cucumber/Gherkin/BDD and do you think it has a strong overlap to what you talked about here? 19:54.600 Q: What granularity are you looking for re your org files and contents, with respect to a codebase that it tangles to, or in non-coding contexts? """]]Duration: 22:48 minutes