[[!template id="chapters" vidid="qanda-gypsum" data="""
03:14.320 Q: I'm curious to know how the hell guile-emacs deals with all of the dynamically scoped modules out there. Is there any effort to automatically modularize and namespace stuff?
05:23.640 Q: Would it be possible to support a GUI toolkit other than GTK?
06:46.040 Q: Do you plan to provide improvements to Elisp as a language, or is the focus on a compatibility layer to facilitate doing all new extensions, etc. in Scheme?
08:19.440 Q: Can we consider a translator like utility to convert elisp to scheme, once guile-emacs becomes a reality?
10:50.600 Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal?
12:02.280 Q: What is the plan to handle elisp packages that depend on 3rd party/external libraries? (libgit/magit or rg/ripgrep)?
15:55.280 Q: Not really a question, but how about Schemacs as a name?
17:25.880 Q: Why is it not feasible for the Emacs layer that interprets Emacs Lisp (the core in C) ot have a Scheme interpreter, instead of using Guile?
"""]]