WEBVTT 00:00:02.000 --> 00:00:02.000 00:00:02.000 --> 00:00:05.780 All right. I think we're live. Thank you, Andrew, for the 00:00:05.780 --> 00:00:06.480 great talk. 00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:09.040 Folks, if you'd like to ask your questions, please post 00:00:09.040 --> 00:00:11.280 them on the pad. And at some point 00:00:11.280 --> 00:00:13.340 in like a minute or two, we'll also open this big blue 00:00:13.340 --> 00:00:14.560 button room if you'd like to 00:00:14.560 --> 00:00:17.480 join here directly and ask questions here. Take it away, 00:00:17.480 --> 00:00:18.000 Andrew. 00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:25.200 Yeah, thanks. So should I be reading the questions from the 00:00:25.200 --> 00:00:26.880 pad? Yeah. 00:00:26.880 --> 00:00:28.400 Yeah, that would be great. 00:00:29.040 --> 00:00:34.760 OK, so I see there's a question about is this built into Em 00:00:34.760 --> 00:00:37.440 acs? I guess that refers to SQLite. 00:00:37.440 --> 00:00:41.630 And is it possible to have multiple schemas, multiple 00:00:41.630 --> 00:00:43.840 databases? Yes, you could do all that 00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:48.270 with Emacs 29. SQLite is built in. You can open up multiple 00:00:48.270 --> 00:00:50.000 databases simultaneously and do just 00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:53.460 the normal things that you can do with databases. You can 00:00:53.460 --> 00:00:54.640 create whatever tables you want. 00:00:55.440 --> 00:01:00.720 You can create-- you can have transactions. So it's pretty 00:01:00.720 --> 00:01:04.000 full featured. With SQLite, 00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:08.270 there's also a notion of additions. You could kind of 00:01:08.270 --> 00:01:10.880 compile new things into it. And I'm not 00:01:10.880 --> 00:01:14.560 exactly sure to the extent that that is possible as well. 00:01:14.560 --> 00:01:16.400 So it's like how full featured of a 00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:19.540 SQLite is it? I'm not sure. But the basic stuff, you can 00:01:19.540 --> 00:01:21.680 certainly do. And that basic stuff is 00:01:21.680 --> 00:01:26.860 fantastic. Next question is, what about collaborative 00:01:26.860 --> 00:01:29.920 editing with this? Can you 00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:35.070 have multiple computers with multiple Emacs with org mode? 00:01:35.070 --> 00:01:37.840 I think it sort of depends. Yes, 00:01:37.840 --> 00:01:41.640 I mean, databases are fantastic for having multiple users 00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:44.080 doing multiple things at the same time. 00:01:44.080 --> 00:01:48.990 And they're really designed for this use case. So I would 00:01:48.990 --> 00:01:51.760 say, yes, you could have multiple 00:01:51.760 --> 00:01:56.810 editing of the database, multiple editing, whereas you see 00:01:56.810 --> 00:02:04.160 some [AUDIO OUT] probably not the best 00:02:04.160 --> 00:02:06.830 solution. I suspect it might be possible, but I wouldn't 00:02:06.830 --> 00:02:08.720 want to try it. I think it's better for, 00:02:08.720 --> 00:02:12.660 like, oh, you can have multiple processes, multiple users, 00:02:12.660 --> 00:02:14.400 perhaps contributing to the 00:02:14.400 --> 00:02:17.610 same database. And you're growing the database, but not 00:02:17.610 --> 00:02:20.080 such tight synchronous interactivity that 00:02:20.080 --> 00:02:24.520 I think you might be imagining here. What about using this 00:02:24.520 --> 00:02:26.880 on multiple computers? How do you 00:02:26.880 --> 00:02:31.140 synchronize your data? I don't know. I need to figure that 00:02:31.140 --> 00:02:33.040 out. I think there's a-- like, 00:02:33.040 --> 00:02:36.470 yes, you can synchronize your database in the same [AUDIO 00:02:36.470 --> 00:02:38.320 OUT] Emacs doesn't have any great 00:02:38.320 --> 00:02:43.000 solutions for this. That is, like, when-- let's say I want 00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:45.680 to synchronize the things I'm editing 00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:49.280 on Emacs with my phone. There's all sorts of various 00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:52.320 solutions. You could use Dropbox, Google 00:02:52.320 --> 00:02:56.930 Drive, these kinds of things. The database makes that a 00:02:56.930 --> 00:02:59.600 little bit harder in the sense that it's 00:02:59.600 --> 00:03:04.400 one giant database. I suspect there are interesting ways to 00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:06.560 do this, but I haven't explored this area 00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:09.180 yet. I think it's a great question, though, and I would 00:03:09.180 --> 00:03:10.800 like to investigate this further. 00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:16.640 Are you planning to further-- this is a new other question. 00:03:16.640 --> 00:03:18.720 Are you planning to further develop EKG? 00:03:18.720 --> 00:03:22.330 It's highly [AUDIO OUT] me, and I do prefer SQLite over 00:03:22.330 --> 00:03:23.920 Text. Thank you for buying into 00:03:25.200 --> 00:03:29.280 the vision. I really like to hear that. Yeah, I am 00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:32.080 personally using EKG. I am developing it. 00:03:32.080 --> 00:03:36.940 I don't think it's ready for general use yet. I'd like to 00:03:36.940 --> 00:03:39.680 get it to a state where it is ready 00:03:39.680 --> 00:03:43.410 for general use probably by the end of the month. I think I 00:03:43.410 --> 00:03:45.600 'll have a lot of time. There's a pretty 00:03:45.600 --> 00:03:50.500 slow month. So that would be really nice. I've just added a 00:03:50.500 --> 00:03:52.160 bunch of stuff to it. 00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:55.970 I'm exploring. I think the difficult thing is not 00:03:55.970 --> 00:03:58.000 necessarily to make it production, 00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:01.800 like to make it stable and everything like that and to do 00:04:01.800 --> 00:04:04.320 all the developer things that you want 00:04:04.320 --> 00:04:09.380 to see in the state of the art era, but really, it's a 00:04:09.380 --> 00:04:12.240 different model of how to have notes. 00:04:12.240 --> 00:04:16.860 I'm still thinking about some of these fundamental concepts 00:04:16.860 --> 00:04:18.080 . It took me a long 00:04:18.080 --> 00:04:22.030 time to iterate on various designs before I came up with EK 00:04:22.030 --> 00:04:24.240 G, which I think is [AUDIO OUT] 00:04:24.240 --> 00:04:27.200 and so we're going to really see how this goes. But yes, 00:04:27.200 --> 00:04:29.920 look for it soon. I'll probably announce it 00:04:29.920 --> 00:04:39.410 and maybe on email. And then I will make it available 00:04:39.410 --> 00:04:40.960 probably maybe on 00:04:42.000 --> 00:04:46.780 new alpha is what I would like to do. Is it possible to 00:04:46.780 --> 00:04:47.760 combine the 00:04:47.760 --> 00:04:51.610 triples database with some custom tables in the same SQLite 00:04:51.610 --> 00:04:56.240 file? Yes. I'm sorry. Let me continue 00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:59.670 reading. You need to build a log table next to the triples 00:04:59.670 --> 00:05:02.080 table or a quick query of event data. 00:05:02.080 --> 00:05:04.270 Yeah, you certainly could do that. And I've been thinking 00:05:04.270 --> 00:05:04.720 of adding, 00:05:05.520 --> 00:05:09.210 like, just having a record of changes might be an 00:05:09.210 --> 00:05:12.720 interesting thing. But yeah, it's just one table 00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:17.840 and you really could use this one table called triples, the 00:05:17.840 --> 00:05:22.000 triples table, in any other database 00:05:22.000 --> 00:05:24.230 or with any other database. It's kind of designed to be its 00:05:24.230 --> 00:05:26.080 own database though. But yeah, you could 00:05:26.080 --> 00:05:28.500 certainly add things to the side and I can imagine people 00:05:28.500 --> 00:05:29.840 writing extensions that do 00:05:30.560 --> 00:05:34.000 add some tables to the side to do whatever. It's just that 00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:37.680 I think you want to be careful because 00:05:37.680 --> 00:05:42.660 that once you start doing that, you might want to, you don 00:05:42.660 --> 00:05:45.040 't want to kind of duplicate information or 00:05:45.040 --> 00:05:47.490 start having things go out of sync. It's kind of nice just 00:05:47.490 --> 00:05:49.600 to have one kind of data. But I think 00:05:49.600 --> 00:05:52.090 in certain circumstances, like the kind you're thinking 00:05:52.090 --> 00:05:54.320 about, it'd be appropriate. Yeah, so 00:05:54.320 --> 00:06:00.010 seems like a good idea. And then I see this final question 00:06:00.010 --> 00:06:02.800 here, final for now. What are your 00:06:02.800 --> 00:06:05.270 thoughts on adding a timestamp attribute to triple so that 00:06:05.270 --> 00:06:07.280 the database becomes append-only and by 00:06:07.280 --> 00:06:10.570 default you return the latest fact for a subject-object 00:06:10.570 --> 00:06:13.360 pair? Oh, really interesting question. 00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:19.560 Let's just say I haven't thought of that and I'll have to 00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:21.680 think about it. I don't think, 00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:26.110 I haven't seen other triples databases do this. I'd be 00:06:26.110 --> 00:06:28.000 interested in what you thought 00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:33.610 would be some of the, what you thought might be some of the 00:06:33.610 --> 00:06:34.960 interesting 00:06:34.960 --> 00:06:39.440 things that come out of this. Yes, you can maybe go back in 00:06:39.440 --> 00:06:41.760 time, which is nice, 00:06:41.760 --> 00:06:45.620 but then it seems hard to do things like deletes. I guess 00:06:45.620 --> 00:06:48.000 you could have tombstones or something 00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:51.110 like that, but it becomes a little bit more complicated. 00:06:51.110 --> 00:06:52.880 And also just one thing is like, 00:06:52.880 --> 00:06:55.390 these kind of databases, I didn't really talk about this in 00:06:55.390 --> 00:06:57.120 the talk, but they take up a little 00:06:57.120 --> 00:06:59.870 bit of room and I'm a little bit reluctant to have them 00:06:59.870 --> 00:07:01.760 even more kind of heavyweight. 00:07:01.760 --> 00:07:05.380 On the other hand, perhaps this would go well with the 00:07:05.380 --> 00:07:07.680 question about synchronization. If you 00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:11.840 were to do as you suggest and have timestamped triples, 00:07:11.840 --> 00:07:14.080 synchronization actually becomes pretty 00:07:14.080 --> 00:07:18.110 easy. So definitely an interesting thought that I'll have 00:07:18.110 --> 00:07:19.600 to think a little bit more about. I 00:07:19.600 --> 00:07:23.970 would love to solve the synchronization problem. All right. 00:07:23.970 --> 00:07:29.520 I don't see any other, oh yeah, 00:07:29.520 --> 00:07:33.740 I don't see any other questions, but you can ask on this, 00:07:33.740 --> 00:07:38.160 on the big blue button or type in any 00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:42.730 other questions. Otherwise I think we might be done. Cool. 00:07:42.730 --> 00:07:45.280 And I will add that. I think we still 00:07:45.280 --> 00:07:48.590 have about like, I guess, 15 minutes or so of live Q&A talk 00:07:48.590 --> 00:07:52.320 for this talk on stream. If there are no 00:07:52.320 --> 00:07:54.790 questions, you're welcome to cut it short, but otherwise we 00:07:54.790 --> 00:07:56.320 have plenty of time. So yeah, if 00:07:56.320 --> 00:07:59.910 people want to get more questions in, please do. I'm just 00:07:59.910 --> 00:08:01.680 going to sit back and wait for the 00:08:01.680 --> 00:08:06.000 questions to roll in then. Sounds good. Thank you. 00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:35.920 All right. I see another question pop up. 00:08:37.040 --> 00:08:37.040 00:08:37.040 --> 00:08:41.400 With EKG, what about views like org-roam-node-mindmap-views 00:08:41.400 --> 00:08:44.080 ? Yeah. I personally have 00:08:44.080 --> 00:08:47.280 not found those views to be super helpful, but I know 00:08:47.280 --> 00:08:49.680 people like them a lot. I don't see any 00:08:49.680 --> 00:08:52.800 reason why you couldn't do this. It just would be a 00:08:52.800 --> 00:08:56.000 slightly different implementation. Like this 00:08:56.000 --> 00:09:02.940 stuff forms a graph. You can do whatever you, you know, you 00:09:02.940 --> 00:09:05.920 could easily transform it like that same 00:09:05.920 --> 00:09:09.560 org-roam UI. You just have to have like another sort of 00:09:09.560 --> 00:09:12.160 translation layer basically to kind of 00:09:12.160 --> 00:09:16.450 like figure out how to deal with the stuff in EKG or really 00:09:16.450 --> 00:09:19.520 anything with triples. Like fundamentally 00:09:19.520 --> 00:09:23.240 it's a graph database, so it lends itself naturally to 00:09:23.240 --> 00:09:25.680 things that you're going to be doing, 00:09:25.680 --> 00:09:30.080 that anything you're going to be doing with the triples 00:09:30.080 --> 00:09:30.800 library. 00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:32.400 00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:52.480 [silence] 00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:46.220 I see another question. Can ordinary Lisp data types, Lisp 00:09:46.220 --> 00:09:59.440 symbols, etc. be stored in the 00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:04.760 database? Yes, they can. In fact, it's primarily like if 00:10:04.760 --> 00:10:07.120 you don't specify anything, it kind of 00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:10.900 defaults to a list. That's sort of, I'm not exactly sure 00:10:10.900 --> 00:10:13.520 that's the right design choice, but that's 00:10:13.520 --> 00:10:19.230 kind of, it seems like a lot of the times it, this kind of 00:10:19.230 --> 00:10:24.000 makes sense. Like what if I just added 00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:27.000 like a title, I think, if I remember. I did add a title, 00:10:27.000 --> 00:10:29.360 but I'm trying to remember. If I just added 00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:33.770 the notion of like having a title to EKG and I believe that 00:10:33.770 --> 00:10:36.240 's a list. Because you think about it, 00:10:36.240 --> 00:10:39.160 you could maybe have alternate titles or multiple titles. 00:10:39.160 --> 00:10:40.880 So these are ordered lists and so it kind 00:10:40.880 --> 00:10:44.380 of stores it. So basically what happens is you store in the 00:10:44.380 --> 00:10:46.560 list of like, but each list item is 00:10:46.560 --> 00:10:49.910 a separate row in the table and it has, we call them tri 00:10:49.910 --> 00:10:52.880 ples, but there's actually one more column 00:10:52.880 --> 00:10:54.720 that I don't talk about a lot because it just confuses the 00:10:54.720 --> 00:10:56.160 story. But in this case it's relevant 00:10:56.160 --> 00:10:59.040 because there you just say what the index is of the item 00:10:59.040 --> 00:11:01.120 that you're doing it. So like you'd be 00:11:01.120 --> 00:11:09.150 subject and then the predicate would be title in a sense. 00:11:09.150 --> 00:11:12.400 And then title one and then like, 00:11:12.400 --> 00:11:15.860 okay, that's index one on the fourth column. And then same 00:11:15.860 --> 00:11:17.200 thing with the other items. 00:11:17.840 --> 00:11:24.090 You can store symbols, SQLite and Emac SQL allow you to 00:11:24.090 --> 00:11:27.920 sort of kind of, well, Emac SQL kind of 00:11:27.920 --> 00:11:31.130 naturally lets you store lots of different things. And SQL 00:11:31.130 --> 00:11:33.840 ite, I kind of had to do something that 00:11:33.840 --> 00:11:39.790 was very similar to Emac SQL. Emac SQL, in SQL, you have to 00:11:39.790 --> 00:11:43.120 just, in your database, it basically 00:11:43.120 --> 00:11:47.000 has to be string. Like almost everything besides the predic 00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:49.120 ates, like the object has to be a string 00:11:49.120 --> 00:11:52.250 because it could really be anything. And the subject has to 00:11:52.250 --> 00:11:53.840 be a string because it could be 00:11:53.840 --> 00:12:00.490 anything. And because of that, we kind of have to make sure 00:12:00.490 --> 00:12:04.080 that we kind of have to just store 00:12:04.080 --> 00:12:06.840 things in a certain way. Like symbols are just strings and 00:12:06.840 --> 00:12:10.720 lists. You could even have a list, 00:12:12.640 --> 00:12:17.810 you could have really any list expression as a subject, 00:12:17.810 --> 00:12:21.600 right? But it gets just written to a 00:12:21.600 --> 00:12:27.720 string and then it gets, when it gets read, it basically, 00:12:27.720 --> 00:12:30.960 if it's just a string, it gets read 00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:36.370 basically as a list symbol or expression. And if it's a 00:12:36.370 --> 00:12:39.840 string, it's a string with a string inside, 00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:44.130 that is like the string actually has quotes on either end. 00:12:44.130 --> 00:12:46.000 Then we say it's actually a string. 00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:48.770 That's how kind of the internal implementation works. And 00:12:48.770 --> 00:12:50.320 that's what Emac SQL does as well. 00:12:50.320 --> 00:12:55.040 For those who are not familiar, Emac SQL is like this other 00:12:55.040 --> 00:12:58.560 way to kind of interact with SQL in 00:12:58.560 --> 00:13:02.210 your databases and it works well with SQLite and allows you 00:13:02.210 --> 00:13:04.400 to do things like store numbers and 00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:08.960 lists as well. And it does this exact same thing. So we try 00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:10.320 to keep compatibility. 00:13:10.320 --> 00:13:18.910 So you could start a database in Emacs 28 using Emacs SQL 00:13:18.910 --> 00:13:23.440 and then you could read it with Emacs 29 00:13:23.440 --> 00:13:27.430 using the built in SQLite. That's the hope. I mean, I have 00:13:27.430 --> 00:13:28.720 tests, but I don't think anyone 00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:35.050 has actually tried to do that exact thing yet. Let's see. 00:13:35.050 --> 00:13:39.040 Are there any other new questions? 00:13:39.040 --> 00:13:44.240 Oh, there are some. Beyond note taking, what kind of 00:13:44.240 --> 00:13:45.360 packages do you 00:13:45.360 --> 00:13:49.680 think would benefit from a triple library? I think, 00:13:49.680 --> 00:13:53.830 I mean, I think it's generally just an easy way to store 00:13:53.830 --> 00:13:54.880 things. So 00:13:56.800 --> 00:14:03.200 anything in which you, think of packages that have to store 00:14:03.200 --> 00:14:03.440 like 00:14:03.440 --> 00:14:09.440 list expressions on the side. Like for example, like BBDB, 00:14:09.440 --> 00:14:11.200 if you've used that, 00:14:11.200 --> 00:14:14.110 it's just a, it is a database. It's the big brother 00:14:14.110 --> 00:14:17.200 database. It's not in a database because 00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:19.890 it was written before. Like there was an easy way to use 00:14:19.890 --> 00:14:22.480 databases in Emacs. Like that should, 00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:24.640 that could definitely, like you don't need the triples 00:14:24.640 --> 00:14:26.160 library, but you could easily do this 00:14:26.160 --> 00:14:31.120 in the triples library. And I would kind of think triples, 00:14:31.120 --> 00:14:33.120 you know, just takes care of a lot of 00:14:33.120 --> 00:14:37.280 things and gives a little option over everything. So I mean 00:14:37.280 --> 00:14:39.760 , there's all sorts of things like, 00:14:39.760 --> 00:14:42.210 as I, as I kind of demoed like bookmarks, like why are book 00:14:42.210 --> 00:14:43.920 marks not in the database? They should be. 00:14:43.920 --> 00:14:48.150 So I think if you just look around and look at all these, 00:14:48.150 --> 00:14:50.640 all these things as, 00:14:51.280 --> 00:14:55.680 as just, just dumping, dumping list expressions to a file, 00:14:55.680 --> 00:14:57.440 those probably 00:14:57.440 --> 00:15:01.870 SQLite and, and, you know, maybe triples would be a useful 00:15:01.870 --> 00:15:03.200 way to do that. 00:15:03.200 --> 00:15:08.720 Are you, another question, are you trying to PIM? I think 00:15:08.720 --> 00:15:11.120 that means personal information management 00:15:11.120 --> 00:15:16.160 with EKG. And what information do you want to manage? I'm 00:15:16.160 --> 00:15:17.120 kind of wondering 00:15:18.720 --> 00:15:21.400 how I, what I want to do, but like, as I just said in the 00:15:21.400 --> 00:15:23.440 previous question, like, I think 00:15:23.440 --> 00:15:26.960 you should be storing everything. Yeah. Like libraries, 00:15:26.960 --> 00:15:28.880 like, yeah, actually, yeah. BBBB, 00:15:28.880 --> 00:15:32.180 you can store contacts and email addresses. And I would 00:15:32.180 --> 00:15:34.320 like to, you know, why, if you're storing 00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:37.110 that, then it's kind of natural, like, oh, well, you know, 00:15:37.110 --> 00:15:38.880 sometimes I want to have a annotation. 00:15:38.880 --> 00:15:41.380 I want to write something about this person and, you know, 00:15:41.380 --> 00:15:44.000 maybe I want to have something and have, 00:15:46.400 --> 00:15:48.930 you know, maybe I want to tag this person. Maybe I want to, 00:15:48.930 --> 00:15:53.200 maybe I want to have notes that refer 00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:55.700 to this person. So like, it all starts to look like one 00:15:55.700 --> 00:15:57.280 giant database when I, when you kind 00:15:57.280 --> 00:16:01.120 of think about it a lot, which is kind of why in a, if you 00:16:01.120 --> 00:16:04.800 look at the develop, develop branch of 00:16:04.800 --> 00:16:08.290 triples, I, I'm work, I think what's going to be in the 00:16:08.290 --> 00:16:10.400 next version is, is going to be a 00:16:10.400 --> 00:16:14.110 standardized place to, to have a database. That is, you can 00:16:14.110 --> 00:16:17.360 just connect to a, to a, the standard 00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:19.360 database and you don't have to worry about where the 00:16:19.360 --> 00:16:21.280 database is. We'll keep track of that for you. 00:16:21.280 --> 00:16:27.540 And, and then everything should be working very easily and 00:16:27.540 --> 00:16:30.320 like allow this kind of collaborative 00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:32.770 use of, of these things. So like, yeah, it could be a 00:16:32.770 --> 00:16:34.720 personal information manager that has all 00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:37.330 sorts of information because I think that's what people 00:16:37.330 --> 00:16:39.440 tend to use Emacs for is that, you know, 00:16:39.440 --> 00:16:43.610 I have my own notes, my own contacts, my own tasks, you 00:16:43.610 --> 00:16:46.080 know, why aren't tasks in, tasks should 00:16:46.080 --> 00:16:49.820 also perhaps be in, in, in the database. Like, yeah, it's 00:16:49.820 --> 00:16:52.000 kind of, org mode is completely awesome, 00:16:52.000 --> 00:16:56.110 like really incredible. And it's, it's nice to mix to do's 00:16:56.110 --> 00:16:58.480 with things with text, but sometimes 00:16:58.480 --> 00:17:01.850 maybe you just want to do's that are not with text and 00:17:01.850 --> 00:17:04.160 maybe those could be also in the database. 00:17:04.160 --> 00:17:06.050 I don't know. It's just things I, things I'm thinking about 00:17:06.050 --> 00:17:07.200 . I'm not sure how far I want to 00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:12.160 take that. Another question. What about using other 00:17:12.160 --> 00:17:16.000 database programs like Postgres, MonoDB? 00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:27.550 You, so I think you could, yes, you could do that. I don't 00:17:27.550 --> 00:17:29.920 see it's a, I don't know why you, 00:17:29.920 --> 00:17:32.720 I don't know if there's any advantage to doing this. Like 00:17:32.720 --> 00:17:35.280 SQLite is kind of nice because it is 00:17:35.280 --> 00:17:38.490 light. It is kind of, it is built into Emacs and we don't 00:17:38.490 --> 00:17:39.760 really need anything incredibly 00:17:39.760 --> 00:17:42.210 sophisticated here. Just having a database is like such a 00:17:42.210 --> 00:17:43.680 higher level of sophistication than 00:17:43.680 --> 00:17:47.500 what we've been doing in Emacs are so far. Then you know, I 00:17:47.500 --> 00:17:50.000 think the other stuff might be overkill, 00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:52.800 but I see no reason why it wouldn't work. I just don't 00:17:52.800 --> 00:17:54.640 really see if there's really any big 00:17:54.640 --> 00:18:00.620 advantages. What is your preferred reference to underscan 00:18:00.620 --> 00:18:04.960 triples graph DBs? To sort of think 00:18:04.960 --> 00:18:07.330 about better schema design? Oh, that's a really awesome 00:18:07.330 --> 00:18:12.480 question. And I would, I don't, I don't 00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:15.570 think I can answer that immediately. I kind of know all 00:18:15.570 --> 00:18:17.520 this stuff from talking to people 00:18:17.520 --> 00:18:21.730 basically, instead of like reading things. And like in my 00:18:21.730 --> 00:18:25.040 work, I use these triples. That is, 00:18:25.040 --> 00:18:28.100 that's kind of like, you know, I kind of work on a 00:18:28.100 --> 00:18:30.560 knowledge graph. So I just have a, from, 00:18:30.560 --> 00:18:35.860 you know, working knowledge of how these things work. So, 00:18:35.860 --> 00:18:38.400 but it is an awesome question that let 00:18:38.400 --> 00:18:41.530 me, let me look into it after I kind of finished this and I 00:18:41.530 --> 00:18:43.440 'll, I'll try to fill it in, in the, 00:18:43.440 --> 00:18:47.210 in the either pad that is connected to this talk. So thank 00:18:47.210 --> 00:18:49.200 you for that great question. 00:18:49.200 --> 00:18:53.960 So another question, will it slow down with the growth of a 00:18:53.960 --> 00:18:56.960 database? Yeah, I need to do 00:18:56.960 --> 00:19:00.040 tests about this. Cause I'd like to see like how much, how 00:19:00.040 --> 00:19:01.360 much the database blows up, 00:19:01.360 --> 00:19:05.120 how much it slows down for sure. Triples is not the most 00:19:05.120 --> 00:19:07.360 efficient way. It's not even close 00:19:07.360 --> 00:19:10.650 to being a greatly efficient way to store data for doing 00:19:10.650 --> 00:19:13.120 any arbitrary things. But what it is, 00:19:13.120 --> 00:19:17.510 it you're trading off standardization, which is, so you get 00:19:17.510 --> 00:19:19.600 standardization, but you lose, 00:19:19.600 --> 00:19:24.880 you lose the power of getting things in one SQL expression. 00:19:24.880 --> 00:19:26.480 So you often have to kind of like do 00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:31.400 a bunch of round trips and that's slow. However, I I'm 00:19:31.400 --> 00:19:36.320 using this now. I have a bunch of data 00:19:36.320 --> 00:19:40.440 and you know, quite a bit. I've, I kind of poured it over 00:19:40.440 --> 00:19:42.720 my old org Rome to, to EKG. 00:19:42.720 --> 00:19:45.860 And you know, I've been accumulating stuff in our room for 00:19:45.860 --> 00:19:47.920 like, you know, two years now, 00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:52.510 and it's pretty big, but it's very fast, really just no, no 00:19:52.510 --> 00:19:55.200 problems at all. So yes, I'm sure 00:19:55.200 --> 00:20:00.750 that there is a, a size in which it's too big to be fast. 00:20:00.750 --> 00:20:04.400 But I haven't hit it. And I suspect for 00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:09.230 most ordinary uses of, of, of Emacs, I doubt other people 00:20:09.230 --> 00:20:12.160 will hit it as well. I mean, it's kind of 00:20:12.160 --> 00:20:14.380 similar to, you know, when people think about org Rome and 00:20:14.380 --> 00:20:15.760 things like, well, you know, you're 00:20:15.760 --> 00:20:17.980 storing everything in one database, like how many notes 00:20:17.980 --> 00:20:19.520 could have possibly hold, like that's also 00:20:19.520 --> 00:20:25.980 going to get slow. Right. So yeah, it's, it's I think these 00:20:25.980 --> 00:20:29.760 limits exist, but people tend not to 00:20:29.760 --> 00:20:32.480 hit them and it's like, yes, this is going to get slow, but 00:20:32.480 --> 00:20:34.320 it'll certainly do better. I think that 00:20:34.320 --> 00:20:38.850 files in the file system. What are the, here's another 00:20:38.850 --> 00:20:41.920 question. What are your thoughts on 00:20:41.920 --> 00:20:47.130 allowing for a true graph DB backend? Whatever the current 00:20:47.130 --> 00:20:50.480 best free software alternative to Neo4j 00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:54.710 is, I guess. Okay. Great question. I've actually, yeah, I 00:20:54.710 --> 00:20:57.360 actually used graph databases and several 00:20:57.360 --> 00:21:00.580 companies I used to work for and you know, but we always 00:21:00.580 --> 00:21:03.040 ended up switching to SQL. I like it's, 00:21:03.040 --> 00:21:08.000 it's I can't, it's just at least for serious applications, 00:21:08.000 --> 00:21:10.080 they tended to be slow and 00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:14.310 lend themselves to a use that was not, that was very iter 00:21:14.310 --> 00:21:16.480 ative and not very well thought out. 00:21:16.480 --> 00:21:23.880 So however, I don't think it's as I said, with the last 00:21:23.880 --> 00:21:28.720 question for the way people want to, 00:21:28.720 --> 00:21:31.090 you know, the kind of data I think Emacs users will want, I 00:21:31.090 --> 00:21:32.480 think a graph database would work 00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:36.610 quite well. I don't know if there would be like, what are 00:21:36.610 --> 00:21:38.720 the advantages over triples 00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:41.700 aside from sort of just a more, you don't have to kind of 00:21:41.700 --> 00:21:43.440 even deal with the SQL layer, but like, 00:21:43.440 --> 00:21:46.040 I'm kind of, I'm kind of building, you know, with triples, 00:21:46.040 --> 00:21:47.760 we're sort of like, don't even worry about 00:21:47.760 --> 00:21:50.220 what the layer is, right? It's just, you don't even have to 00:21:50.220 --> 00:21:51.920 worry about SQL if you're just using 00:21:51.920 --> 00:21:57.040 kind of the normal functionality. So you can yeah. So, you 00:21:57.040 --> 00:22:00.160 know, maybe there are interesting 00:22:00.160 --> 00:22:02.670 implications for using a graph database, but I can't really 00:22:02.670 --> 00:22:03.680 think of any right now. 00:22:03.680 --> 00:22:09.910 It's a good question though. Thank you. - And I'll quickly 00:22:09.910 --> 00:22:10.880 add that we have about, 00:22:10.880 --> 00:22:14.850 I think two more minutes ish on this live stream. And then 00:22:14.850 --> 00:22:17.120 folks are welcome to either join here for 00:22:17.120 --> 00:22:19.560 continuing the Q and A or keep posting questions on the pad 00:22:19.560 --> 00:22:21.040 and you can continue here in this room 00:22:21.040 --> 00:22:24.000 after the stream moves on. - Okay. In that case, I'll, 00:22:24.000 --> 00:22:28.320 I will stick around until I don't get any more questions 00:22:28.320 --> 00:22:30.080 for a few minutes, then I'll probably 00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:33.440 log off. - Sounds great. Thank you. 00:22:33.440 --> 00:22:35.440 - Yeah. 00:22:58.960 --> 00:23:02.640 - I'm hungry. Did I get writing and recording this? So I 00:23:02.640 --> 00:23:06.560 actually did a month ago. So like, 00:23:06.560 --> 00:23:10.530 I don't even, I hardly even remember what it was, what that 00:23:10.530 --> 00:23:12.160 time was like, but yes, it's, 00:23:12.160 --> 00:23:14.480 it took a long time. These things, you know, these 00:23:14.480 --> 00:23:16.480 recordings are a little bit challenging. And in 00:23:16.480 --> 00:23:18.780 fact, I only kind of screwed up in several instances of the 00:23:18.780 --> 00:23:20.240 recording. And like, I just, 00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:22.240 I just don't have energy to kind of keep redoing. It's like 00:23:22.240 --> 00:23:23.760 , it's a long recording. It's also, 00:23:23.760 --> 00:23:26.000 I think I chopped it up into three bits. I'm not sure if it 00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:27.600 was that, is that obvious, but like, 00:23:27.600 --> 00:23:31.860 I guess, notes for people doing future sessions, it's like, 00:23:31.860 --> 00:23:35.680 make sure you have natural pauses that 00:23:35.680 --> 00:23:39.860 you can sort of just like record a segment because 00:23:39.860 --> 00:23:42.880 something would inevitably go wrong. And then like, 00:23:42.880 --> 00:23:45.200 if you're trying to repeat a 20 minute talk, it just takes 00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:48.720 forever. Yes. Oh yeah. The recipes. 00:23:48.720 --> 00:23:54.230 That's right. Yeah. I, well, yes, I'm glad you enjoyed the 00:23:54.230 --> 00:23:56.480 recipe. This is great. You put the 00:23:56.480 --> 00:23:59.800 recipes in there. Like one thing that I think is, is useful 00:23:59.800 --> 00:24:01.840 for, you know, regardless of what 00:24:01.840 --> 00:24:06.110 thing you're using in org-roam or EKG or whatever, you know 00:24:06.110 --> 00:24:08.240 , when you're making a recipe, 00:24:08.240 --> 00:24:11.230 you know, record in your daily diary, like, you know, when 00:24:11.230 --> 00:24:12.800 you, what you did it, if it worked, 00:24:12.800 --> 00:24:16.160 like what, what, you know, what adjustments you had to make 00:24:16.160 --> 00:24:17.760 , how it turned out, how it could be 00:24:17.760 --> 00:24:21.320 better. Then like, if it's linked to the recipe, then you 00:24:21.320 --> 00:24:23.040 have a kind of a record of like, oh, 00:24:23.040 --> 00:24:25.720 these are, you know, not just the recipe, but like your 00:24:25.720 --> 00:24:27.840 experiences making the recipe. I think 00:24:27.840 --> 00:24:32.140 it's really powerful because then you can see how, you know 00:24:32.140 --> 00:24:34.480 , you can kind of refine, refine and 00:24:34.480 --> 00:24:37.030 refine. It's really hard to do this in other ways. Like if 00:24:37.030 --> 00:24:38.640 just, you're just using your memory, 00:24:38.640 --> 00:24:40.730 you're, you're kind of like, well, it's, I can't remember 00:24:40.730 --> 00:24:42.000 what I did the last time I made this 00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:45.940 recipe, but like, you know, it seems a little bit extreme, 00:24:45.940 --> 00:24:48.240 but I think it's quite useful to use 00:24:48.240 --> 00:25:01.720 these note-taking applications for this use case. Okay. I 00:25:01.720 --> 00:25:03.440 think the stream has moved on, but again, 00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:05.620 you're all welcome to stay here and continue to Q&A as long 00:25:05.620 --> 00:25:06.720 as there are any questions. 00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:13.440 Thank you for your moderation. 00:25:15.120 --> 00:25:19.920 Cheers. Happy to. Thanks for the great talk. 00:25:21.200 --> 00:25:21.200 00:25:21.200 --> 00:25:23.200 [end of transcript] 00:25:46.080 --> 00:25:49.120 While I see if there's any more questions, I'm going to 00:25:49.120 --> 00:25:50.320 fill in, I think not, not all 00:25:50.320 --> 00:25:52.710 the replies are filled in. So I'm going to start filling in 00:25:52.710 --> 00:25:53.200 this, you know, 00:25:53.200 --> 00:25:56.240 the pad that's associated with this. 00:25:56.400 --> 00:25:56.400 00:25:56.400 --> 00:25:58.400 [end of transcript] 00:26:00.160 --> 00:26:00.160 00:26:00.160 --> 00:26:00.560 Okay. 00:26:02.560 --> 00:26:02.560 00:26:02.560 --> 00:26:04.560 [end of transcript] 00:26:04.560 --> 00:26:14.560 Okay. 00:26:16.560 --> 00:26:16.560 00:26:16.560 --> 00:26:18.560 [end of transcript] 00:26:20.560 --> 00:26:20.560 00:26:20.560 --> 00:26:20.560 Okay. 00:26:22.560 --> 00:26:22.560 00:26:22.560 --> 00:26:22.560 Okay. 00:26:24.560 --> 00:26:24.560 00:26:24.560 --> 00:26:24.560 Okay. 00:26:26.560 --> 00:26:26.560 00:26:26.560 --> 00:26:26.560 Okay. 00:26:28.560 --> 00:26:28.560 00:26:28.560 --> 00:26:28.560 Okay. 00:26:30.560 --> 00:26:30.560 00:26:30.560 --> 00:26:30.560 Okay. 00:26:32.560 --> 00:26:32.560 00:26:32.560 --> 00:26:32.560 Okay. 00:26:34.560 --> 00:26:34.560 00:26:34.560 --> 00:26:34.560 Okay. 00:26:36.560 --> 00:26:36.560 00:26:36.560 --> 00:26:36.560 Okay. 00:26:36.560 --> 00:26:46.560 Okay. 00:26:46.560 --> 00:26:56.560 Okay. 00:26:56.560 --> 00:27:06.560 Okay. 00:27:06.560 --> 00:27:16.560 Okay. 00:27:16.560 --> 00:27:26.560 Okay. 00:27:26.560 --> 00:27:36.560 Okay. 00:27:36.560 --> 00:27:46.560 Okay. 00:27:46.560 --> 00:27:56.560 Okay. 00:27:56.560 --> 00:28:06.560 Okay. 00:28:06.560 --> 00:28:16.560 Okay. 00:28:16.560 --> 00:28:26.560 Okay. 00:28:26.560 --> 00:28:36.560 Okay. 00:28:36.560 --> 00:28:46.560 Okay. 00:28:46.560 --> 00:28:56.560 Okay. 00:28:56.560 --> 00:29:06.560 Okay. 00:29:06.560 --> 00:29:16.560 Okay. 00:29:16.560 --> 00:29:26.560 Okay. 00:29:26.560 --> 00:29:36.560 Okay. 00:29:36.560 --> 00:29:46.560 Okay. 00:29:46.560 --> 00:29:56.560 Okay. 00:29:56.560 --> 00:30:06.560 Okay. 00:30:06.560 --> 00:30:16.560 Okay. 00:30:16.560 --> 00:30:26.560 Okay. 00:30:26.560 --> 00:30:30.560 All right. I, there's no one here and I don't like any 00:30:30.560 --> 00:30:35.360 other questions. So I am going to log out. Thank you 00:30:35.360 --> 00:30:36.560 everyone for your questions. 00:30:36.560 --> 00:30:38.560 [end of transcript] 00:30:40.560 --> 00:30:40.560