From 465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ihor Radchenko Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 05:25:02 +0200 Subject: 2026/talks/llms.md: Use the latest version of questions --- 2026/talks/llms.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/2026/talks/llms.md b/2026/talks/llms.md index 61dc86f8..65072339 100644 --- a/2026/talks/llms.md +++ b/2026/talks/llms.md @@ -45,12 +45,13 @@ Questions: 1. If you were to imagine an ideal AI software you would use with Emacs, how would it look like? How would it **not** look like? What freedoms it would need to have? Feel free to answer anything, not - limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. + limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. If your answer is + that no such software should exist, that is a valid answer. 2. What is the most useful application of LLMs with Emacs for you personally? If you are not using LLMs, imagine that there is an - ideal AI or complex automation software you would be willing to use - and come up with such application. + ideal AI or complex automation software (non-AI) you would be + willing to use and come up with such application. 3. What is the most critical use case in your Emacs workflows where you would **avoid** using AI? -- cgit v1.2.3