From 1e4d1b37a6b65341579f7a5e080295560a432b06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leo Vivier Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 20:48:07 +0200 Subject: Push notes from last session --- 2021/meetings.org | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) diff --git a/2021/meetings.org b/2021/meetings.org index a18cc20b..8a61139a 100644 --- a/2021/meetings.org +++ b/2021/meetings.org @@ -88,6 +88,21 @@ - mplsCorwin's livestreaming project, working on trimming - Diversity outreach: gopar, sachac, zaeph, mplsCorwin +* October 9, 2021 meeting + +- TODO + - bandali: + - Send the follow-ups + - Special care for 40: Ask for doing their talk on Sunday rather than Saturday + - zaeph: + - Take care of the replies from the follow-ups bandali + - Remove sticky from r/emacs + - sachac: + - Going to wait for bandali to finish submitting the de-anonymised versions to front0 + +- TODO for the session + - Renumber the proposals chronologically + * October 2, 2021 meeting - TODO @@ -96,6 +111,96 @@ - Reaching out to jwiegley for new Emacs update - Get in touch with corwin for the streaming setup +- Scheduling with sachac + - Questions raised by sachac after studying the anonymised talks + - Do we want to publish it? + - If we publish it, how precise do we want it to be? + - Do we want to think about dropping talks? + - Time exceptions + - Those are the ones we’ve either bumped down + + - Do we post this draft schedule, or do we say that all the people who help us with the scheduling? + - bandali does have an informal list of people involved + - bandali (but he’ll excuse himself since he anonymised + - zaeph + - dbremner + - sachac + - seabass + - acw (Chase) + - corwin + - We’ll probably need to think about which responsibilities we hand over to new orgas, since some of them might be tough (like asking candidates to reduce the size/scope of their talks, or shepherding some of the talks which we don’t think are ready yet) + + - Talk-specific considerations for exceptions + - 21: Resolved + - We might want to ask the candidate to record two versions, since the topic is very interesting, but it’s going to be quite tough to fit in the whole 40-min presentation that the candidate intended to + - Since the candidate mentions that there were two-parts, it might make more sense to trim one of the parts + - We could also offer 30-min, but that’d need to reduce the duration of 04 (M-x forever) + - We’ve resolved it by cutting the opening remarks on that day + - 40: + - 34 & 13: + - We need to get the candidates talking + - That’s not a blocker for accepting them, but we still + - 01: + - Maybe we could get the candidate to mention the reMarkable tablet, since it’s more aligned with our FLOSS goals? + - We’re not enthused with + - 02: + - Maybe make it clearer that this is the son + + - Potential talks we’re still waiting to hear from + - jwiegley’s dev update + + - Broadcasting with subtitles? + - [[https://wiki.c3subtitles.de/en:styleguide][Guide for subtitling talks]] + - We will push for big talks to have subtitles + - We can speakers to provide scripts if they’ve used one; otherwise, we can use whichever technique fits best (YouTube captioning; hand-editing them) + + - bandali has fired up emacsconf-private-2021 for sharing conf.org + - We’ll keep pre-recs info on it, for example. + + - Report on anonymising the proposals + - bandali: It wasn’t *too* bad; removing the names, the GH links was easy, but it’s definitely not a process + - sachac: Maybe something we can automatise next year! *maniacal laugh* + + - Content for the follow-up email: + - Talk is accepted + - Specify which time duration we are accepting (can be automatised?) + - Double-checking availability + - Pre-rec deadline: [2021-10-31 Sun] or [2021-11-07 Sun] latest + - Gentle incentive to submit early so that we can get them captioned + - Please start your talk with your name so that we can now how to pronounce it! + - ‘If you happen to have a script for your talk, please submit it as well!’ + - After you’ve finished your pre-rec, feel free to record a longer one that we can direct people to + - Tell people that there will be a page for them on emacsconf.org + - We should ask them for their pronouns which we will include on that page + - …But let’s not aim for sending them the actual URL to the page, since they might be subject to change + + - Content that we’ve consider for the follow-up email + - Nudge to write blog-posts about + + - Extra stuff to do on tech-checks + - Re-asking how to pronounce their names + + - How to introduce people + - Let zaeph do it + - Come up with Englishised IPA for the names of everyone (which zaeph would take care of) + - Actually, it could be zaeph’s entire role + + - For EmacsConf’s 2022: + - We might want to track talks according to IDs + - Submission could be sub-01-$title.org + +Notes from Paul: +#+BEGIN_QUOTE +There is a free software camp coming up that could be useful to signpost people from there to emacs conf to learn about e-macs +https://camp.fsci.in/ +p;us the free software foundation europe +Youth Hacking For Freedom +If you like coding, tinkering, and having fun with software and if you are up for a challenge, we have something exciting for you: "Youth Hacking 4 Freedom" (YH4F), the FSFE's hacking competition for young people from Europe! +https://yh4f.org/ +Which again could be somewhere to promote emacs / emacs conf +#+END_QUOTE + + * September 25, 2021 meeting - TODO - bandali & corwin: -- cgit v1.2.3