From 7f4a4c5ceb51828ab2db82ffe3ec7a477648559a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sacha Chua Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 12:37:21 -0500 Subject: update --- 2025/info/hyperboleqa-before.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to '2025/info/hyperboleqa-before.md') diff --git a/2025/info/hyperboleqa-before.md b/2025/info/hyperboleqa-before.md index 7b6d24e4..7a044d3c 100644 --- a/2025/info/hyperboleqa-before.md +++ b/2025/info/hyperboleqa-before.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Status: TO_REVIEW_QA
[[!template id="chapters" vidid="mainVideo-hyperboleqa" data=""" -00:15.640 Q: I'm excited to know opinion on current state of using MCP and Ai for PKM and PIEs. Since they do carry lot of burden out of us and ease lot of process. How does hyperbole stand with coming days? +00:15.640 Q: I'm excited to know opinion on current state of using MCP and AI for PKM and PIEs. Since they do carry lot of burden out of us and ease lot of process. How does hyperbole stand with coming days? 02:54.200 Q: As a normal user who codes and takes notes, I really want to deep-dive and learn Hyperbole, but always end up winding back up to embark and org-mode being the better system. For me hyperbole looks like over-engineered (or over-configured) system which other individual packages do well. And outside emacs there is no system supporting hyperbole nor any usability. 05:13.640 Implicit buttons 06:43.840 Getting help -- cgit v1.2.3