From b08d03c82dcf1d2d80823140078693fc182754a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sacha Chua Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 13:00:58 -0500 Subject: add gypsum video --- 2024/info/gypsum-before.md | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to '2024') diff --git a/2024/info/gypsum-before.md b/2024/info/gypsum-before.md index 524407d7..466e14cb 100644 --- a/2024/info/gypsum-before.md +++ b/2024/info/gypsum-before.md @@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ Status: TO_CAPTION_QA # Q&A -
+
[[!template id="chapters" vidid="gypsum-qanda" data=""" +03:09.370 Q: I'm curious to know how the hell guile-emacs deals with all of the dynamically scoped modules out there. Is there any effort to automatically modularize and namespace stuff? +05:23.646 Q: Would it be possible to support a GUI toolkit other than GTK? +06:45.257 Q: Do you plan to provide improvements to Elisp as a language, or is the focus on a compatibility layer to facilitate doing all new extensions, etc. in Scheme? +08:08.439 Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal? +08:29.673 Q: Can we consider a translator like utility to convert elisp to scheme, once guile-emacs becomes a reality? +10:54.390 Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal? +12:08.539 Q: What is the plan to handle elisp packages that depend on 3rd party/external libraries? (libgit/magit or rg/ripgrep)? +15:21.112 Q: Not really a question, but how about Schemacs as a name? +16:45.931 Q: Why is it not feasible for the Emacs layer that interprets Emacs Lisp (the core in C) ot have a Scheme interpreter, instead of using Guile? + +"""]]
# Description \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3