From 436f702956aad327f9039ae842d7c524ec4cbf72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sacha Chua Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:31:26 -0500 Subject: add YouTube URLs, Q&A video URLs --- 2024/info/gypsum-before.md | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to '2024/info/gypsum-before.md') diff --git a/2024/info/gypsum-before.md b/2024/info/gypsum-before.md index ae5c0975..7f437b35 100644 --- a/2024/info/gypsum-before.md +++ b/2024/info/gypsum-before.md @@ -9,20 +9,20 @@ Status: TO_CAPTION_QA # Talk -
Duration: 24:36 minutes
+
Duration: 24:36 minutes
# Q&A
[[!template id="chapters" vidid="qanda-gypsum" data=""" -03:09.370 Q: I'm curious to know how the hell guile-emacs deals with all of the dynamically scoped modules out there. Is there any effort to automatically modularize and namespace stuff? -05:23.646 Q: Would it be possible to support a GUI toolkit other than GTK? -06:45.257 Q: Do you plan to provide improvements to Elisp as a language, or is the focus on a compatibility layer to facilitate doing all new extensions, etc. in Scheme? -08:29.673 Q: Can we consider a translator like utility to convert elisp to scheme, once guile-emacs becomes a reality? -10:54.390 Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal? -12:08.539 Q: What is the plan to handle elisp packages that depend on 3rd party/external libraries? (libgit/magit or rg/ripgrep)? -15:21.112 Q: Not really a question, but how about Schemacs as a name? -16:45.931 Q: Why is it not feasible for the Emacs layer that interprets Emacs Lisp (the core in C) ot have a Scheme interpreter, instead of using Guile? - -"""]]
Listen to just the audio:
Duration: 23:38 minutes
+03:14.320 Q: I'm curious to know how the hell guile-emacs deals with all of the dynamically scoped modules out there. Is there any effort to automatically modularize and namespace stuff? +05:23.640 Q: Would it be possible to support a GUI toolkit other than GTK? +06:46.040 Q: Do you plan to provide improvements to Elisp as a language, or is the focus on a compatibility layer to facilitate doing all new extensions, etc. in Scheme? +08:19.440 Q: Can we consider a translator like utility to convert elisp to scheme, once guile-emacs becomes a reality? +10:50.600 Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal? +12:02.280 Q: What is the plan to handle elisp packages that depend on 3rd party/external libraries? (libgit/magit or rg/ripgrep)? +15:55.280 Q: Not really a question, but how about Schemacs as a name? +17:25.880 Q: Why is it not feasible for the Emacs layer that interprets Emacs Lisp (the core in C) ot have a Scheme interpreter, instead of using Guile? + +"""]]
Listen to just the audio:
Duration: 23:38 minutes
# Description \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3