-obviously, of Bisos. So thank you so much for the +obviously, of BISOS. So thank you so much for the
presentation. Before we get started with the question, and @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ And I'm all for that. So the idea of BLEE is that Others can package things, and we are seeing this in the form
-of redistributions. There is Doom, there is Space Max, and +of redistributions. There is Doom, there is Spacemacs, and
we are seeing the evolution of Emacs into layers. So there is @@ -85,16 +85,16 @@ So that was one idea. The other idea or the other theme throughout the various talks that we saw was this concept of
-mixing org mode with programming languages and What Babel +mixing org-mode with programming languages and what Babel
has done is two things. One is it has successfully
-integrated org mode with all kinds of languages. And that +integrated org-mode with all kinds of languages. And that
-has happened in the context of literate programming. Um, so +has happened in the context of literate programming. So
a talk coming after mine is literate programming for the @@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ a talk coming after mine is literate programming for the what I am saying is that there is an alternative and that's
-great, but we should also, uh, consider a traditional +great, but we should also, consider a traditional
-programming mixed with org mode and, um, Polymode is key to +programming mixed with org-mode and, polymode is key to
that. So those were some of the key concepts that I saw a @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ various talks last year, but it also tends to have a similar stance than you, with the fact that text should be embedded
-in programming languages rather than having Org Mode +in programming languages rather than having Org-Mode
implement, I mean, integrate other languages. And I found @@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ fit into my talk is that the several concepts that I introduced, namely
-dynamic blocks everywhere and COMEEGA. +Dynamic Blocks everywhere and COMEEGA.
-I'd be happy to expand on those by sharing your screen in due +I'd be happy to expand on those by sharing a screen in due
course, whatever is appropriate. Sure, considering the @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ Right. So definitely, I would say for everybody who is on this conference, the international edition is the right
-choice. In this book, I take some aggressive stance against +choice. In this book, I take some aggressive stances against
intellectual property and I link that specifically to the @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ I haven't read much of that. I think there is a whole lot of global growth and collective understanding towards this
-notion that the direction we are headed in And by that, I mean +notion that the direction we are headed in and by that, I mean
American digital ecosystems @@ -354,22 +354,22 @@ this intersect? Let me read this for a moment. Yeah, I am not sure I fully get the point, but. Let me make a
-point about my criticisms of the false movement +point about my criticisms of the FOSS movement
in the presentation and in the book. The idea is that we have
-jumped on the false movement and recognize it as an +jumped on the FOSS movement and recognize it as an
-alternative But we haven't looked deeply enough to see if +alternative but we haven't looked deeply enough to see if
our own philosophy and movement have problems. The
-problems that I note is that The first movement does not +problems that I note is that the FOSS movement does not
recognize clearly and explicitly that the entirety of the @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ piece is that it's only now that we are seeing the FOSS movement is broader than the Western world. The third
-problem is that the labels of free software and open source +problem is that the labels of Free Software and Open Source
are not necessarily correct. The fourth problem is that we @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ still live for 15 more seconds, do you have any last words? Keep up the good work. Those would be my last words, that the
-free software and the open source and Emacs are a very valid +Free Software and the Open Source and Emacs are a very valid
strategy for inside of IPR resistance. And thank you, Leo @@ -480,19 +480,19 @@ Hi, John. I was looking at the questions.
-To see if there is more that I can add. So. +To see if there is more that I can add. So,
through the regard of societal impacts on ethical,
-philosophical and wider force community. I'm involved in +philosophical and wider FOSS community. I'm involved in
politics in my country, my party is very sympathetic to
-force ideas and I have public... +FOSS ideas and I have public... NOTE Q: Do you have any recommended reading materials designed for such an audience? -- cgit v1.2.3