From c1d515fddaf9966d1c8fa8ef640b10420558ce6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sacha Chua Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:26:54 -0400 Subject: Document decision about volunteers and emacsconf-org --- 2022/organizers-notebook.org | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) (limited to '2022/organizers-notebook.org') diff --git a/2022/organizers-notebook.org b/2022/organizers-notebook.org index c31b0fd1..ae8730fe 100644 --- a/2022/organizers-notebook.org +++ b/2022/organizers-notebook.org @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ CLOSED: [2022-09-22 Thu 15:02] https://emacsconf.org/2022/volunteer ** TODO Figure out JS and CSS niceties that will make organizers-notebook more enjoyable to browse through :css:js: + - TODO/DONE/etc. keyword highlighting? - Collapsible sections? @@ -233,6 +234,26 @@ Ideas: - Multiple streams with more space between talks, people choose which stream they want to watch - How other conferences do it - Speakers can attend related talks more easily +** Archive +*** Where should volunteers e-mail? +:LOGBOOK: +- Note taken on [2022-09-23 Fri 11:26] \\ + Discussed in #emacsconf-org +:END: + +- *Default to emacsconf-org and offer emacsconf-org-private as an option* +- emacsconf-org-private + - less public, e.g. if for whatever reason we might have to decline an offer of help + - Also, some people want to volunteer but do not want to be in the public’s eye. +- emacsconf-org + - If you’re thinking about the enticement factor of having people + volunteer publicly, we’ll still have a well-furnished list of people + helping us run the conf somewhere on the wiki. [11:22] + - i would think if someone doesn't want to do it publicly, they could + opt to write to -org-private instead, but otherwise the defacto + should be public (-org) + - i just think most folks would want to do this publicly unless for + specific reasons, rather than the other way around * Roles needed :PROPERTIES: -- cgit v1.2.3