summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/2024/captions
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main--chapters.vtt47
-rw-r--r--2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main.vtt724
-rw-r--r--2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main--chapters.vtt35
-rw-r--r--2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main.vtt1151
-rw-r--r--2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-sun-close--sunday-closing-remarks--main.vtt118
5 files changed, 2075 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main--chapters.vtt b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main--chapters.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..640735ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main--chapters.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+WEBVTT
+
+
+00:00:00.000 --> 00:01:35.252
+Introduction
+
+00:01:35.253 --> 00:03:06.331
+Do I still literate?
+
+00:03:06.332 --> 00:04:28.719
+Advantages
+
+00:04:28.720 --> 00:05:24.132
+Disadvantages
+
+00:05:24.133 --> 00:06:24.719
+Ease of typing
+
+00:06:24.720 --> 00:07:22.500
+Keep tangled code sync'd
+
+00:07:22.501 --> 00:08:19.959
+Code evaluation
+
+00:08:19.960 --> 00:09:05.238
+Has that block been eval'd?
+
+00:09:05.239 --> 00:09:26.871
+Evaluating code in a subtree
+
+00:09:26.872 --> 00:10:26.019
+Evaluating code from a distance
+
+00:10:26.020 --> 00:11:26.793
+Navigating by headers
+
+00:11:26.794 --> 00:13:40.479
+Navigating by function names
+
+00:13:40.480 --> 00:14:23.165
+Why literate programming?
+
+00:14:23.166 --> 00:14:55.799
+LP prose isn't comments
+
+00:14:55.800 --> 00:15:51.240
+Summary
diff --git a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main.vtt b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..986320d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-literate--literate-programming-for-the-21st-century--howard-abrams--main.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,724 @@
+WEBVTT captioned by sachac
+
+NOTE Introduction
+
+00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.359
+Can you believe it's been a decade since I started
+
+00:00:09.360 --> 00:00:12.358
+pontificating on literate programming?
+
+00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:17.542
+I am Howard Abrams. In 2015, I spoke at this EmacsConf
+
+00:00:17.543 --> 00:00:21.705
+where I described my challenges I called Literate DevOps.
+
+00:00:21.706 --> 00:00:25.634
+The conference wasn't completely virtual, even though I was.
+
+00:00:25.635 --> 00:00:29.317
+My city of Portland was suffering a citywide electrical outage
+
+00:00:29.318 --> 00:00:33.479
+and I was without power, so I gave the talk in a corner of my
+
+00:00:33.480 --> 00:00:37.439
+friend's living room. People online asking questions and
+
+00:00:37.440 --> 00:00:41.439
+wondering about literate programming... I also see comments
+
+00:00:41.440 --> 00:00:44.599
+explaining why literate programming hasn't caught on in
+
+00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:49.079
+corporate practice. I often don't engage. I mean, is the
+
+00:00:49.080 --> 00:00:51.599
+online arguments and chatter over ignorance or
+
+00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:56.719
+preference? Sure, we're wired differently. I mean, my
+
+00:00:56.720 --> 00:00:59.559
+favorite programming languages put the parentheses
+
+00:00:59.560 --> 00:01:01.939
+before the function name.
+
+00:01:01.940 --> 00:01:03.800
+Literate programming has come a long way
+
+00:01:03.801 --> 00:01:08.519
+since Knuth proposed it in the 19th century. I feel
+
+00:01:08.520 --> 00:01:12.999
+it's come a long way just in the last 10 years. Obviously,
+
+00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:16.399
+this interest is due to Org. I don't think I would bother if
+
+00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:21.359
+all I had was Knuth's original preprocessor. But since I'm
+
+00:01:21.360 --> 00:01:24.839
+talking to fellow nerds about an open source project
+
+00:01:24.840 --> 00:01:27.919
+without corporate backing, let me change the title of my
+
+00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:32.919
+talk and re-pitch Literate Programming in the 24th and a
+
+00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:35.252
+Half Century!
+
+NOTE Do I still literate?
+
+00:01:35.253 --> 00:01:36.653
+People often ask if I still program that way.
+
+00:01:36.654 --> 00:01:42.759
+I guess they want to know if there's any long-term benefits,
+
+00:01:42.760 --> 00:01:45.919
+for many of our tools and our workflows, while initially
+
+00:01:45.920 --> 00:01:51.079
+tantalizing, often don't last. But yes, when I sit down to
+
+00:01:51.080 --> 00:01:57.759
+write a program, I create a file with an extension of .org.
+
+00:01:57.760 --> 00:02:03.799
+I guess you can say I program literally.
+
+00:02:03.800 --> 00:02:07.359
+Let me be transparent. Do I use literate programming during
+
+00:02:07.360 --> 00:02:12.599
+my day job? Yes, but only for personal tools or for initial
+
+00:02:12.600 --> 00:02:16.759
+investigation. At the end of the sprint, I tangle the file
+
+00:02:16.760 --> 00:02:21.079
+and git commit that. My personal projects, on the other
+
+00:02:21.080 --> 00:02:25.679
+hand, are Org files. Since I can't show you the code from
+
+00:02:25.680 --> 00:02:27.839
+my day job, I'm afraid my example code will have a lot of
+
+00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:31.159
+parentheses.
+
+00:02:31.160 --> 00:02:33.955
+I'm sure you won't mind.
+
+00:02:33.956 --> 00:02:37.356
+I like having my Emacs configuration in Org.
+
+00:02:37.357 --> 00:02:40.359
+It's pretty bling. It has over 8,000
+
+00:02:40.360 --> 00:02:44.559
+lines of code. I know, I can hear the screams and gasps over
+
+00:02:44.560 --> 00:02:49.439
+the network. However, the surrounding prose in Org adds
+
+00:02:49.440 --> 00:02:53.410
+10,000 lines, and those lines are non-wrapped paragraphs.
+
+00:02:53.411 --> 00:02:58.119
+I mean, is that large? Sure, we've all worked on
+
+00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:03.639
+larger, so I guess it's not huge. Come on, it's still
+
+00:03:03.640 --> 00:03:06.331
+significant.
+
+NOTE Advantages
+
+00:03:06.332 --> 00:03:09.799
+Advantages? Look who I'm talking to. I'm sure
+
+00:03:09.800 --> 00:03:14.279
+you know the advantages, but indulge me. I feel that one
+
+00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:16.799
+advantage of literate programming, especially with large
+
+00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:20.279
+code bases, is how you can organize and manage the
+
+00:03:20.280 --> 00:03:24.839
+complexity. Most programming languages tame large bases
+
+00:03:24.840 --> 00:03:29.119
+by putting code in separate files. While Org can too, with
+
+00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:32.279
+Org, we can group related functions together under
+
+00:03:32.280 --> 00:03:35.043
+expandable headlines.
+
+00:03:35.044 --> 00:03:37.279
+Here's one. You can see that
+
+00:03:37.280 --> 00:03:40.706
+I've got different sections grouped together.
+
+00:03:40.707 --> 00:03:43.759
+In my original talk, I mentioned how I would attempt to organize
+
+00:03:43.760 --> 00:03:47.839
+my thoughts before coding. I appreciate how I can look back
+
+00:03:47.840 --> 00:03:53.599
+at my notes. In my Emacs configuration, I review the prose to
+
+00:03:53.600 --> 00:03:57.799
+help memorize key bindings.
+
+00:03:57.800 --> 00:04:01.039
+My section on getting email working with Emacs using
+
+00:04:01.040 --> 00:04:04.079
+notmuch means creating small collections of scripts and
+
+00:04:04.080 --> 00:04:08.199
+configuration files. I can tangle them all from one Org
+
+00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:16.799
+file. I like that I can explain each part separately.
+
+00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:20.879
+You just can't beat having links back to Stack Overflow or
+
+00:04:20.880 --> 00:04:25.519
+that GitHub repo where you stole, I mean, became inspired to
+
+00:04:25.520 --> 00:04:28.719
+write your code.
+
+NOTE Disadvantages
+
+00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:34.279
+Literate programming may push the boundaries of our
+
+00:04:34.280 --> 00:04:38.119
+workflows and revealing some abrasion, but we aren't
+
+00:04:38.120 --> 00:04:41.239
+solely working with Org. We have the flexibility of a Lisp
+
+00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:45.119
+engine to file down those rough parts. You may have your
+
+00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:48.159
+concerns. Perhaps you could reach out to me, and with
+
+00:04:48.160 --> 00:04:54.239
+particular issues, maybe we can figure something out.
+
+00:04:54.240 --> 00:04:57.439
+Here is my list of frictions, and the rest of my talk
+
+00:04:57.440 --> 00:05:02.159
+demonstrates my answers and my hacks. The goal in literate
+
+00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:05.039
+programming with Org is that it should not require more
+
+00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:08.679
+effort than non-literate programming. For instance, I
+
+00:05:08.680 --> 00:05:12.119
+shouldn't have to type much more than regular programming
+
+00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:15.719
+to get my code literate. I also shouldn't have to worry about
+
+00:05:15.720 --> 00:05:20.799
+the state between my Org file and the source code. I want
+
+00:05:20.800 --> 00:05:24.132
+to be able to jump around my code just as easily.
+
+NOTE Ease of typing
+
+00:05:24.133 --> 00:05:28.654
+Let me explain more. I've created some templates using
+
+00:05:28.655 --> 00:05:34.679
+yasnippet. Since I was used to the old org-tempo feature,
+
+00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:37.145
+my habit has all the snippets starting with a
+
+00:05:37.146 --> 00:05:40.759
+< character. I'm not sure if I should demonstrate all of them
+
+00:05:40.760 --> 00:05:45.999
+as you may be doing something similar. I like to build on top
+
+00:05:46.000 --> 00:05:49.999
+of characters to remind me that if I just enter a <s, I
+
+00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:53.519
+need to put in the language. But if I append a mnemonic, I can
+
+00:05:53.520 --> 00:05:56.839
+get a full language. Why not do that with a full function
+
+00:05:56.840 --> 00:06:01.199
+definition? In this case, I'm smooshing one yasnippet
+
+00:06:01.200 --> 00:06:11.679
+inside another one in order to save myself some typing.
+
+00:06:11.680 --> 00:06:15.159
+My point here is to pay attention to what slows you down or
+
+00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:24.719
+hinders you from getting the advantages you want.
+
+NOTE Keep tangled code sync'd
+
+00:06:24.720 --> 00:06:28.399
+Do you ever forget to tangle your code? You can append this
+
+00:06:28.400 --> 00:06:31.519
+code to the bottom of your Org file so that it gets tangled
+
+00:06:31.520 --> 00:06:36.159
+every time you save. I've written a function so I can visit
+
+00:06:36.160 --> 00:06:40.559
+that tangled file and then return. I've grouped all my
+
+00:06:40.560 --> 00:06:45.119
+functions together. I've taken a cue from Charles Choi, you
+
+00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:48.639
+know, kickingvegas, and his Casual feature set. But
+
+00:06:48.640 --> 00:06:52.374
+instead of Transient, I've just made a hydra using
+
+00:06:52.375 --> 00:06:57.399
+the major-mode-hydra package. Anyway, this allows me to use and
+
+00:06:57.400 --> 00:07:00.136
+remember my micro-optimizations.
+
+00:07:00.137 --> 00:07:03.697
+If you set the :comments property to link,
+
+00:07:03.698 --> 00:07:06.999
+the tangled output is back-connected.
+
+00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:11.479
+This allows us to edit the tangled code and have it update the
+
+00:07:11.480 --> 00:07:16.879
+Org file. Personally, I don't like this. My source of truth
+
+00:07:16.880 --> 00:07:22.500
+is the Org file, and I tangle as a one-way diode.
+
+NOTE Code evaluation
+
+00:07:22.501 --> 00:07:25.603
+Often a block of code will reference a variable
+
+00:07:25.604 --> 00:07:29.046
+or call a function to find in another block of code.
+
+00:07:29.047 --> 00:07:31.508
+In my original literate DevOps talk,
+
+00:07:31.509 --> 00:07:34.519
+I discussed how to use the output from one block into
+
+00:07:34.520 --> 00:07:37.799
+another block by naming the first block and referencing it
+
+00:07:37.800 --> 00:07:42.159
+with a :var for the second. However, if all the blocks use the
+
+00:07:42.160 --> 00:07:46.039
+same language, you can use sessions, which create a
+
+00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:51.479
+persistent REPL behind the scenes. Let's evaluate the
+
+00:07:51.480 --> 00:07:53.199
+blocks of Python code in this file.
+
+00:07:53.200 --> 00:08:00.119
+The evaluation created a Python REPL. It's available in
+
+00:08:00.120 --> 00:08:04.279
+another buffer. This buffer matches the name of the
+
+00:08:04.280 --> 00:08:07.959
+session, but with surrounding asterisks. Evaluating a
+
+00:08:07.960 --> 00:08:11.399
+code block sends it into the REPL, and now I can work with my
+
+00:08:11.400 --> 00:08:19.959
+code blocks interactively. (That's not quite right.)
+
+NOTE Has that block been eval'd?
+
+00:08:19.960 --> 00:08:24.039
+I primarily hack on Emacs Lisp, and textual changes to
+
+00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:28.199
+variables, functions, or macros--unless you habitually
+
+00:08:28.200 --> 00:08:31.679
+type C-c C-c--may not represent the state of your
+
+00:08:31.680 --> 00:08:35.439
+machine. A similar effect happens in any language that
+
+00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:39.319
+uses sessions. Sure, I can move the point to a block and
+
+00:08:39.320 --> 00:08:42.799
+evaluate, but I have three functions that allow me to
+
+00:08:42.800 --> 00:08:44.734
+evaluate all blocks in a buffer or all blocks in a subtree,
+
+00:08:44.735 --> 00:08:50.199
+or I can, without moving the point, evaluate any block I see.
+
+00:08:50.200 --> 00:08:54.919
+Now, this function here evaluates all blocks in a buffer.
+
+00:08:54.920 --> 00:08:58.279
+Someone mentioned calling this function when you first
+
+00:08:58.280 --> 00:09:02.359
+load a file. I'm not sure that's a good policy. I mean, have
+
+00:09:02.360 --> 00:09:05.238
+you not written a bug?
+
+NOTE Evaluating code in a subtree
+
+00:09:05.239 --> 00:09:08.559
+Since this function right here
+
+00:09:08.560 --> 00:09:12.039
+evaluates only visible blocks, we can limit what Emacs
+
+00:09:12.040 --> 00:09:18.799
+evaluates to a single Org mode section. For instance, with
+
+00:09:18.800 --> 00:09:23.759
+the cursor in one section, I can evaluate just the blocks in
+
+00:09:23.760 --> 00:09:26.871
+that header section.
+
+NOTE Evaluating code from a distance
+
+00:09:26.872 --> 00:09:29.399
+If I can see a block, why clumsily
+
+00:09:29.400 --> 00:09:33.079
+navigate to it when I can extend the avy project to just jump to
+
+00:09:33.080 --> 00:09:40.479
+it? For instance, let's pull this file up. I can jump to any of
+
+00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:41.639
+the four blocks.
+
+00:09:41.640 --> 00:09:50.319
+I think that's quite slick. Now why navigate to a code block
+
+00:09:50.320 --> 00:09:55.799
+solely to evaluate it? Yes, this is a terrible example, but
+
+00:09:55.800 --> 00:09:59.679
+these three blocks set a variable to different values. So
+
+00:09:59.680 --> 00:10:02.599
+without moving the point, I can evaluate any one of them.
+
+00:10:02.600 --> 00:10:09.719
+To be honest, the reason why I wrote this is because I often
+
+00:10:09.720 --> 00:10:13.999
+forget to evaluate a block after editing it. I've moved on,
+
+00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:17.839
+and I just don't want to jump back. Now, I can just evaluate
+
+00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:22.359
+from a distance. I apologize for the previous terrible
+
+00:10:22.360 --> 00:10:26.019
+examples, but I'm quite pleased with this feature.
+
+NOTE Navigating by headers
+
+00:10:26.020 --> 00:10:30.119
+As I mentioned earlier, in a large code base, we organize code by
+
+00:10:30.120 --> 00:10:33.839
+library or module, and each file contains a class composed
+
+00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:37.119
+of methods, functions, variables, fields, et cetera.
+
+00:10:37.120 --> 00:10:39.999
+Literate programming in Org files allows me to add a
+
+00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:43.159
+semantic organization layer where I can group related
+
+00:10:43.160 --> 00:10:46.919
+concepts under headlines. Now, while this isn't specific
+
+00:10:46.920 --> 00:10:50.799
+to literate programming, I wrote a little user interface to
+
+00:10:50.800 --> 00:10:54.296
+allow me to jump to any heading in any Org file
+
+00:10:54.297 --> 00:10:57.679
+in a particular project.
+
+00:10:57.680 --> 00:11:02.879
+These are the headings in my Emacs configuration project.
+
+00:11:02.880 --> 00:11:06.559
+Notice the file name beforehand, before the colon
+
+00:11:06.560 --> 00:11:09.759
+character. The header name and its parent headers are
+
+00:11:09.760 --> 00:11:14.799
+after. Let me search for the LSP sections. Maybe I only want
+
+00:11:14.800 --> 00:11:20.039
+the one for Python. Now I use ripgrep to search the files and
+
+00:11:20.040 --> 00:11:24.559
+then some Lisp to parse the output. Unless someone has
+
+00:11:24.560 --> 00:11:26.793
+already done this, I should package this up on MELPA.
+
+NOTE Navigating by function names
+
+00:11:26.794 --> 00:11:32.199
+What about jumping directly to the definition of a function,
+
+00:11:32.200 --> 00:11:36.799
+variable, or what have you? We can use Emacs's built-in xref
+
+00:11:36.800 --> 00:11:39.879
+library, but these functions don't understand that the
+
+00:11:39.880 --> 00:11:45.319
+source code is in Org files. When I started using Emacs
+
+00:11:45.320 --> 00:11:49.479
+30-something years ago, I would pre-index my source into
+
+00:11:49.480 --> 00:11:53.799
+tag files, but the dumb-jump project uses the newfangled and
+
+00:11:53.800 --> 00:11:58.319
+faster text search programs like ripgrep to find a symbol in
+
+00:11:58.320 --> 00:12:02.319
+real time. I followed this pattern and wrote an extension
+
+00:12:02.320 --> 00:12:08.119
+to the xref API. Now, I want to jump around my code from both
+
+00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:14.519
+code block or in the surrounding prose. I'm sure it
+
+00:12:14.520 --> 00:12:18.199
+comes as no surprise that my presentation is just an Org
+
+00:12:18.200 --> 00:12:23.919
+file. Let's suppose my cursor is on this symbol. I wrote this
+
+00:12:23.920 --> 00:12:28.079
+function for this demonstration. We can jump to the
+
+00:12:28.080 --> 00:12:30.759
+definition and I can jump back.
+
+00:12:30.760 --> 00:12:37.639
+Notice it jumped into an Org file and back out. References,
+
+00:12:37.640 --> 00:12:42.279
+unlike definitions, is where something is defined and
+
+00:12:42.280 --> 00:12:46.919
+where it's used. Well, you know how the xref system works.
+
+00:12:46.920 --> 00:12:52.679
+Here, I can jump to the definition or where it's
+
+00:12:52.680 --> 00:12:59.519
+used. Of course, and jump back. I think this is cool. This
+
+00:12:59.520 --> 00:13:04.319
+should be a nifty package on MELPA. But my code is specific to
+
+00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:08.799
+Lisp, and I'm not completely sure how to make it general. For
+
+00:13:08.800 --> 00:13:13.399
+instance, what is a symbol? If you know the language, this is
+
+00:13:13.400 --> 00:13:17.679
+obvious. But what should the language be when your cursor is
+
+00:13:17.680 --> 00:13:22.639
+in the prose of an Org file? Python only supports sequences
+
+00:13:22.640 --> 00:13:25.559
+of alphanumeric and underscores, but in Lisp, a symbol can
+
+00:13:25.560 --> 00:13:30.399
+be almost any character sequence. I've been stewing on how
+
+00:13:30.400 --> 00:13:34.479
+to do this. I have ideas like prompting during the first
+
+00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:37.719
+query or scanning the language based on the nearest code
+
+00:13:37.720 --> 00:13:40.479
+block. I think I'm babbling.
+
+NOTE Why literate programming?
+
+00:13:40.480 --> 00:13:47.199
+In true geek fashion, I dived into the details before
+
+00:13:47.200 --> 00:13:52.079
+answering some better questions. In my original Literate
+
+00:13:52.080 --> 00:13:55.479
+DevOps talk, I explained the advantages of initially
+
+00:13:55.480 --> 00:13:58.959
+writing down your thoughts, your plans, goals... the
+
+00:13:58.960 --> 00:14:02.879
+user requirements. But what do you do with all that luscious
+
+00:14:02.880 --> 00:14:06.359
+prose afterwards? Well, you do the same thing you do to your
+
+00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:09.279
+initial code. You refactor that prose.
+
+00:14:09.280 --> 00:14:14.759
+Just because the tech surrounding your code is now a
+
+00:14:14.760 --> 00:14:18.799
+first-class citizen doesn't excuse bad code. You want
+
+00:14:18.800 --> 00:14:23.165
+something more from both your code and your prose.
+
+NOTE LP prose isn't comments
+
+00:14:23.166 --> 00:14:25.586
+The prose of your literate program isn't
+
+00:14:25.587 --> 00:14:28.667
+just regurgitation of the code in the block.
+
+00:14:28.668 --> 00:14:31.527
+You want something more helpful.
+
+00:14:31.528 --> 00:14:35.736
+You're really writing a research paper to yourself.
+
+00:14:35.737 --> 00:14:38.577
+I know what you're thinking. You've seen my Git repos.
+
+00:14:38.578 --> 00:14:41.858
+I'm guilty and not always the best example.
+
+00:14:41.859 --> 00:14:44.559
+However, I do get great joy
+
+00:14:44.560 --> 00:14:48.680
+when I see someone ask about something in Emacs
+
+00:14:48.681 --> 00:14:51.041
+and my response is little more than a link
+
+00:14:51.042 --> 00:14:55.799
+to my online repo that I've rendered as a website.
+
+NOTE Summary
+
+00:14:55.800 --> 00:15:01.199
+I'm out of time. I hope this has been interesting
+
+00:15:01.200 --> 00:15:04.359
+philosophically as well as practically, as I think
+
+00:15:04.360 --> 00:15:08.559
+literate programming is the cat's meow. I'm afraid this
+
+00:15:08.560 --> 00:15:11.879
+summary slide is about my home-baked solutions that fit my
+
+00:15:11.880 --> 00:15:15.119
+needs, but hopefully you can recognize your pain points and
+
+00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:17.839
+address them. If you don't need my Literate
+
+00:15:17.840 --> 00:15:21.479
+DevOps-specific techniques for connecting code blocks, I
+
+00:15:21.480 --> 00:15:25.799
+suggest using sessions by default. I highly recommend
+
+00:15:25.800 --> 00:15:28.399
+looking at your workflow and writing snippets to give you
+
+00:15:28.400 --> 00:15:33.159
+less typing for Org blocks. I now jump by headlines in my
+
+00:15:33.160 --> 00:15:37.479
+projects, but extending xref to support Org files made
+
+00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:40.159
+literate programming as easy as programming the
+
+00:15:40.160 --> 00:15:44.319
+old-fashioned way. I do need to make it more general to put up
+
+00:15:44.320 --> 00:15:47.722
+on MELPA, though. Thanks for watching.
+
+00:15:47.723 --> 00:15:51.240
+Happy hacking, my friends.
diff --git a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main--chapters.vtt b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main--chapters.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9ecf670d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main--chapters.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+WEBVTT
+
+
+00:00:01.260 --> 00:01:24.380
+Introduction
+
+00:01:26.710 --> 00:03:53.280
+Demo
+
+00:03:53.960 --> 00:05:11.160
+Deletion
+
+00:05:12.880 --> 00:05:41.190
+Export
+
+00:05:42.250 --> 00:06:10.790
+HStore
+
+00:06:11.510 --> 00:06:30.390
+Connecting to a different database
+
+00:06:31.110 --> 00:07:31.800
+SchemaSpy
+
+00:07:32.620 --> 00:08:17.790
+Convenience queries
+
+00:08:18.850 --> 00:09:35.590
+Emacs as an application development platform
+
+00:09:36.250 --> 00:11:48.580
+Extending pgmacs
+
+00:11:49.400 --> 00:13:15.420
+Conclusion
diff --git a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main.vtt b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3ce11b67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-pgmacs--pgmacs-browsing-and-editing-postgresql-databases-from-emacs--eric-marsden--main.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,1151 @@
+WEBVTT captioned by eric
+
+NOTE Introduction
+
+1
+00:00:01.260 --> 00:00:03.980
+Hi, this is a short presentation about PGmacs,
+
+2
+00:00:04.180 --> 00:00:07.100
+which is a browsing and editing interface for
+
+3
+00:00:07.100 --> 00:00:08.360
+Postgres databases.
+
+4
+00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:11.320
+My name is Eric Marsden, and I'm the
+
+5
+00:00:11.320 --> 00:00:13.540
+developer of this Emacs Lisp library.
+
+6
+00:00:14.800 --> 00:00:17.420
+PGmacs was inspired by sqlite-mode, which is a
+
+7
+00:00:17.420 --> 00:00:20.600
+great feature available from Emacs 29 onwards.
+
+8
+00:00:21.060 --> 00:00:24.560
+It allows you to view and modify SQLite
+
+9
+00:00:24.560 --> 00:00:26.220
+databases you might have lying around.
+
+10
+00:00:26.760 --> 00:00:28.140
+It's a really great feature.
+
+11
+00:00:28.140 --> 00:00:30.840
+It would be even better, however, if it
+
+12
+00:00:30.840 --> 00:00:32.900
+were able to use a real database.
+
+13
+00:00:34.540 --> 00:00:36.200
+And I happen to know that was possible
+
+14
+00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:38.120
+because a few years ago, I wrote an
+
+15
+00:00:38.120 --> 00:00:42.920
+Emacs Lisp library, pg.el, which implements the wire
+
+16
+00:00:42.920 --> 00:00:46.280
+protocol used for communication over the network between
+
+17
+00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:49.600
+a Postgres client and the Postgres backend, the
+
+18
+00:00:49.600 --> 00:00:50.440
+Postgres server.
+
+19
+00:00:51.580 --> 00:00:53.560
+I've included here an example of what it
+
+20
+00:00:53.560 --> 00:00:54.820
+looks like to use this library.
+
+21
+00:00:54.820 --> 00:00:58.240
+You connect to the database by specifying the
+
+22
+00:00:58.240 --> 00:01:01.520
+database name, your username, your password, potentially the
+
+23
+00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:03.099
+hostname that you're connecting to.
+
+24
+00:01:03.800 --> 00:01:06.680
+Once you're connected, you can then execute SQL
+
+25
+00:01:06.680 --> 00:01:09.640
+statements, for example, to create a new table,
+
+26
+00:01:10.180 --> 00:01:13.860
+to insert values into that table, and to
+
+27
+00:01:13.860 --> 00:01:16.140
+count the number of rows in a table.
+
+28
+00:01:17.100 --> 00:01:20.300
+And pg.el does automatic type conversion to
+
+29
+00:01:20.300 --> 00:01:24.180
+and from Emacs Lisp types and Postgres types for
+
+30
+00:01:24.180 --> 00:01:24.380
+you.
+
+NOTE Demo
+
+31
+00:01:26.710 --> 00:01:29.170
+Probably the best is to jump straight into
+
+32
+00:01:29.170 --> 00:01:30.690
+a demo of PGmacs.
+
+33
+00:01:31.210 --> 00:01:34.130
+When we connect to a database, we see
+
+34
+00:01:34.130 --> 00:01:36.330
+up the top of the buffer, some information
+
+35
+00:01:36.330 --> 00:01:39.070
+about the backend that we're connected to, some
+
+36
+00:01:39.070 --> 00:01:42.010
+version information and the total database size on
+
+37
+00:01:42.010 --> 00:01:42.230
+disk.
+
+38
+00:01:43.090 --> 00:01:45.170
+There are some shortcuts to some commands we
+
+39
+00:01:45.170 --> 00:01:47.370
+can run on the database, and there's a
+
+40
+00:01:47.370 --> 00:01:49.490
+list of tables that we have access to,
+
+41
+00:01:50.230 --> 00:01:52.650
+with again, metainformation about their size on
+
+42
+00:01:52.650 --> 00:01:53.650
+disk and their owner.
+
+43
+00:01:53.650 --> 00:01:56.490
+Now, we can enter a table by pressing
+
+44
+00:01:56.490 --> 00:01:57.090
+return.
+
+45
+00:01:58.510 --> 00:02:01.230
+Here we again see some metainformation about
+
+46
+00:02:01.230 --> 00:02:04.210
+the table, such as the list of columns,
+
+47
+00:02:05.510 --> 00:02:08.490
+the SQL type of each column, any defaults
+
+48
+00:02:08.490 --> 00:02:11.170
+that might be present and any SQL constraints.
+
+49
+00:02:11.970 --> 00:02:14.370
+We see any indexes that might be present
+
+50
+00:02:14.370 --> 00:02:16.790
+on this table, and then we see the
+
+51
+00:02:16.790 --> 00:02:19.070
+list of rows of data in the table.
+
+52
+00:02:19.830 --> 00:02:22.870
+If we see any information which is incorrect
+
+53
+00:02:22.870 --> 00:02:26.710
+or incomplete, we can easily fix it by
+
+54
+00:02:26.710 --> 00:02:36.300
+pressing enter again, and this updates the information
+
+55
+00:02:36.300 --> 00:02:37.900
+present in the database.
+
+56
+00:02:38.200 --> 00:02:39.840
+PGmacs shows us this in the minibuffer
+
+57
+00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:42.480
+it has updated one row.
+
+58
+00:02:43.540 --> 00:02:45.440
+We can look at help for the key
+
+59
+00:02:45.440 --> 00:02:47.440
+bindings that are present in this type of
+
+60
+00:02:47.440 --> 00:02:47.780
+buffer.
+
+61
+00:02:48.120 --> 00:02:49.580
+If we scroll down, we can see that
+
+62
+00:02:49.580 --> 00:02:51.580
+we can upcase the value of a cell
+
+63
+00:02:51.580 --> 00:02:52.680
+with M-u.
+
+64
+00:02:52.920 --> 00:02:53.920
+Let's try that out.
+
+65
+00:02:56.430 --> 00:02:58.950
+Okay, here we have updated the value of
+
+66
+00:02:58.950 --> 00:03:00.670
+the cell in the database.
+
+67
+00:03:00.830 --> 00:03:03.330
+We can now lowercase it, and we can
+
+68
+00:03:03.330 --> 00:03:06.510
+put it back to the initial
+
+69
+00:03:06.510 --> 00:03:07.930
+title case of the value.
+
+70
+00:03:09.010 --> 00:03:11.550
+We can also run a shell command on
+
+71
+00:03:11.550 --> 00:03:14.570
+a cell value, to count the number of
+
+72
+00:03:14.570 --> 00:03:15.670
+characters, for example.
+
+73
+00:03:17.570 --> 00:03:20.390
+We can run a shell command with a
+
+74
+00:03:20.390 --> 00:03:22.990
+prefix argument, which updates the value in the
+
+75
+00:03:22.990 --> 00:03:25.610
+database with the output from the shell command.
+
+76
+00:03:27.470 --> 00:03:29.790
+So that has updated the database.
+
+77
+00:03:30.270 --> 00:03:32.790
+If we do that again, that will reverse
+
+78
+00:03:32.790 --> 00:03:39.750
+the value. If we come back
+
+79
+00:03:39.750 --> 00:03:41.590
+to the list of tables, we see
+
+80
+00:03:41.590 --> 00:03:43.010
+that there is a table which is called
+
+81
+00:03:43.010 --> 00:03:43.590
+deleteme.
+
+82
+00:03:43.890 --> 00:03:50.140
+We can try renaming this table with R,
+
+83
+00:03:50.380 --> 00:03:52.880
+we can look at what is in this
+
+84
+00:03:52.880 --> 00:03:53.280
+table.
+
+NOTE Deletion
+
+85
+00:03:53.960 --> 00:03:56.600
+Okay, there is only one row of information
+
+86
+00:03:56.600 --> 00:03:59.280
+that doesn't seem very important, so let's delete
+
+87
+00:03:59.280 --> 00:03:59.680
+that.
+
+88
+00:04:02.160 --> 00:04:05.600
+Let's now delete the table with DEL.
+
+89
+00:04:07.980 --> 00:04:11.000
+PGmacs asks for confirmation, and we've deleted the
+
+90
+00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:11.240
+table.
+
+91
+00:04:13.390 --> 00:04:15.470
+Now when we have a big table with
+
+92
+00:04:15.470 --> 00:04:18.250
+a lot of data, PGmacs is going to
+
+93
+00:04:18.250 --> 00:04:21.150
+show us the results paginated, so we can
+
+94
+00:04:21.150 --> 00:04:23.350
+go chunk by chunk through the table.
+
+95
+00:04:24.370 --> 00:04:28.070
+We can implement a where filter on the
+
+96
+00:04:28.070 --> 00:04:30.570
+rows to only show the rows that match
+
+97
+00:04:30.570 --> 00:04:32.390
+a certain SQL clause.
+
+98
+00:04:33.110 --> 00:04:35.450
+So for example, here we have some temperature
+
+99
+00:04:35.450 --> 00:04:35.950
+measurements.
+
+100
+00:04:36.490 --> 00:04:38.690
+We want to focus on measurements that are
+
+101
+00:04:38.690 --> 00:04:41.270
+more than 40 degrees Celsius, for example.
+
+102
+00:04:45.980 --> 00:04:48.120
+Okay, we have now filtered on a certain
+
+103
+00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:49.240
+number of rows.
+
+104
+00:04:49.540 --> 00:04:51.240
+The filter is shown to us just up
+
+105
+00:04:51.240 --> 00:04:53.540
+here, and we see here that we have
+
+106
+00:04:53.540 --> 00:04:55.960
+some values that look anomalous.
+
+107
+00:04:56.500 --> 00:04:59.120
+There's one, 140, and one is 61.
+
+108
+00:04:59.840 --> 00:05:02.980
+We probably want to delete them, they represent
+
+109
+00:05:02.980 --> 00:05:03.540
+errors.
+
+110
+00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:06.080
+We can mark them for deletion with d,
+
+111
+00:05:06.560 --> 00:05:09.680
+and then really delete them, expunge them, as
+
+112
+00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:11.160
+in Dired, with x.
+
+NOTE Export
+
+113
+00:05:12.880 --> 00:05:16.120
+We can export this table in CSV format,
+
+114
+00:05:16.480 --> 00:05:17.800
+thanks to this little button up here.
+
+115
+00:05:19.860 --> 00:05:22.760
+Here we have our table conveniently formatted as
+
+116
+00:05:22.760 --> 00:05:23.400
+CSV.
+
+117
+00:05:23.400 --> 00:05:28.480
+We can also export a particular row to
+
+118
+00:05:28.480 --> 00:05:32.080
+JSON by typing j, let's look at
+
+119
+00:05:32.080 --> 00:05:36.270
+what that looks like.
+
+120
+00:05:37.810 --> 00:05:40.230
+Okay, here's the JSON for one of the
+
+121
+00:05:40.230 --> 00:05:41.190
+rows in the table.
+
+NOTE HStore
+
+122
+00:05:42.250 --> 00:05:44.270
+Now let's look at a table that contains
+
+123
+00:05:44.270 --> 00:05:46.350
+a column of type HStore.
+
+124
+00:05:46.430 --> 00:05:48.850
+This is a Postgres-specific key-value map.
+
+125
+00:05:49.110 --> 00:05:51.170
+Then the attributes column is of type
+
+126
+00:05:51.170 --> 00:05:54.750
+JSON, which can be stored natively in Postgres.
+
+127
+00:05:54.750 --> 00:05:56.910
+It's possible to edit these values using a
+
+128
+00:05:56.910 --> 00:06:00.490
+widget-based interface by typing w, and here
+
+129
+00:06:00.490 --> 00:06:03.630
+we have a convenient interface for modifying these
+
+130
+00:06:03.630 --> 00:06:04.450
+types of values.
+
+131
+00:06:05.410 --> 00:06:08.390
+Likewise, for the JSON type parameter, we can
+
+132
+00:06:08.390 --> 00:06:10.790
+update using a widget-based interface.
+
+NOTE Connecting to a different database
+
+133
+00:06:11.510 --> 00:06:14.270
+Let's connect to a different database.
+
+134
+00:06:14.490 --> 00:06:18.910
+We do that with a M-x pgmacs, and
+
+135
+00:06:18.910 --> 00:06:26.670
+then enter our username and password.
+
+136
+00:06:27.310 --> 00:06:29.390
+Here we have the list of tables present
+
+137
+00:06:29.390 --> 00:06:30.390
+in this database.
+
+NOTE SchemaSpy
+
+138
+00:06:31.110 --> 00:06:33.690
+PGmacs has some support for running the SchemaSpy
+
+139
+00:06:33.690 --> 00:06:37.950
+utility, which generates a graphical representation of the
+
+140
+00:06:37.950 --> 00:06:41.710
+relationships between tables in this database, which can
+
+141
+00:06:41.710 --> 00:06:44.470
+be useful when you're discovering the database.
+
+142
+00:06:45.170 --> 00:06:47.870
+Here is the SVG that's output by this
+
+143
+00:06:47.870 --> 00:06:48.470
+utility.
+
+144
+00:06:50.860 --> 00:06:53.840
+This is a test database containing information about
+
+145
+00:06:53.840 --> 00:06:55.460
+a digital media store.
+
+146
+00:06:55.880 --> 00:06:58.160
+It has a table with information about the
+
+147
+00:06:58.160 --> 00:06:59.300
+tracks that are available.
+
+148
+00:07:00.960 --> 00:07:03.480
+If we look at this table, we
+
+149
+00:07:03.480 --> 00:07:04.780
+see that we have the name of the
+
+150
+00:07:04.780 --> 00:07:08.980
+track, a reference to the album, album ID.
+
+151
+00:07:09.240 --> 00:07:11.240
+This is a reference to a foreign key,
+
+152
+00:07:11.660 --> 00:07:13.520
+a key in the table which is called
+
+153
+00:07:13.520 --> 00:07:13.940
+album.
+
+154
+00:07:14.820 --> 00:07:16.840
+Now we can follow this foreign key reference
+
+155
+00:07:16.840 --> 00:07:20.580
+simply by pressing Enter, and here we find
+
+156
+00:07:20.580 --> 00:07:23.100
+it's the album called For Those About To
+
+157
+00:07:23.100 --> 00:07:23.340
+Rock.
+
+158
+00:07:24.260 --> 00:07:26.420
+And in the same way, here we have
+
+159
+00:07:26.420 --> 00:07:28.780
+a foreign key reference to the relevant artist
+
+160
+00:07:28.780 --> 00:07:29.680
+which we can follow.
+
+161
+00:07:30.080 --> 00:07:31.800
+That's, of course, AC/DC.
+
+NOTE Convenience queries
+
+162
+00:07:32.620 --> 00:07:35.720
+And finally, PGmacs has some convenience queries that
+
+163
+00:07:35.720 --> 00:07:38.280
+allows us to list the procedures which are
+
+164
+00:07:38.280 --> 00:07:39.820
+defined in this database.
+
+165
+00:07:40.260 --> 00:07:42.820
+Here we have the built-in procedures, mostly
+
+166
+00:07:42.820 --> 00:07:45.300
+used by the PostGIS extension.
+
+167
+00:07:48.430 --> 00:07:52.110
+We can also display some more information about
+
+168
+00:07:52.110 --> 00:07:52.690
+our backend.
+
+169
+00:07:53.090 --> 00:07:56.450
+Here we have the list of extensions which
+
+170
+00:07:56.450 --> 00:07:56.990
+are available.
+
+171
+00:07:57.470 --> 00:08:00.250
+We can load one of these extensions if
+
+172
+00:08:00.250 --> 00:08:01.570
+we have the rights to do that.
+
+173
+00:08:02.350 --> 00:08:05.290
+Here we've loaded the relevant extension.
+
+174
+00:08:06.210 --> 00:08:08.850
+We can show some information about the Postgres
+
+175
+00:08:08.850 --> 00:08:16.650
+settings also, and update them if we have
+
+176
+00:08:16.650 --> 00:08:17.790
+the rights to do that.
+
+NOTE Emacs as an application development platform
+
+177
+00:08:18.850 --> 00:08:21.650
+Now I'm preaching to the converted, but Emacs
+
+178
+00:08:21.650 --> 00:08:24.870
+is a really great application development platform.
+
+179
+00:08:25.510 --> 00:08:29.130
+PGmacs is currently around 3000 lines of code.
+
+180
+00:08:29.630 --> 00:08:32.510
+A first point of comparison, PGCLI, which is
+
+181
+00:08:32.510 --> 00:08:36.409
+a text user interface for accessing Postgres implemented
+
+182
+00:08:36.409 --> 00:08:39.289
+in Python, is 17,000 lines of code.
+
+183
+00:08:40.390 --> 00:08:43.190
+PGAdmin4, which is a well-known Python GUI
+
+184
+00:08:43.190 --> 00:08:47.010
+for administrating Postgres databases, is almost half a
+
+185
+00:08:47.010 --> 00:08:48.050
+million lines of code.
+
+186
+00:08:48.410 --> 00:08:51.450
+And DBeaver, implemented in Java, is almost a
+
+187
+00:08:51.450 --> 00:08:52.490
+million lines of code.
+
+188
+00:08:53.130 --> 00:08:56.030
+Developing things on Emacs, you get for
+
+189
+00:08:56.030 --> 00:08:58.270
+free portability between different platforms.
+
+190
+00:08:58.470 --> 00:09:00.130
+As I'm showing you, it works great on
+
+191
+00:09:00.130 --> 00:09:02.730
+Linux, which is where I developed this library.
+
+192
+00:09:03.070 --> 00:09:06.530
+It also works perfectly in the terminal, except
+
+193
+00:09:06.530 --> 00:09:08.530
+for some of the functionality I showed, which
+
+194
+00:09:08.530 --> 00:09:10.190
+requires SVG support.
+
+195
+00:09:10.970 --> 00:09:12.630
+It also works well, if you're into that
+
+196
+00:09:12.630 --> 00:09:15.230
+kind of thing, on MacOS and on Windows.
+
+197
+00:09:15.830 --> 00:09:19.130
+And it even works perfectly on Haiku, which
+
+198
+00:09:19.130 --> 00:09:20.770
+is a free BeOS clone.
+
+199
+00:09:21.300 --> 00:09:23.870
+Emacs is actually really pretty on this operating
+
+200
+00:09:23.870 --> 00:09:26.590
+system, so congratulations to the people who did
+
+201
+00:09:26.590 --> 00:09:27.330
+the port there.
+
+202
+00:09:27.530 --> 00:09:29.350
+Now, of course, the main advantage of building
+
+203
+00:09:29.350 --> 00:09:32.430
+on the Emacs development platform, is that the
+
+204
+00:09:32.430 --> 00:09:35.590
+application is easy for the user to extend.
+
+NOTE Extending pgmacs
+
+205
+00:09:36.250 --> 00:09:38.690
+To illustrate that, previously we were looking at
+
+206
+00:09:38.690 --> 00:09:40.650
+a table of temperature measurements.
+
+207
+00:09:42.070 --> 00:09:44.510
+Imagine we want to highlight rows in this
+
+208
+00:09:44.510 --> 00:09:48.430
+table, which look anomalous, where the value looks
+
+209
+00:09:48.430 --> 00:09:49.450
+a bit extreme.
+
+210
+00:09:50.090 --> 00:09:52.150
+That's quite easy to do with a bit
+
+211
+00:09:52.150 --> 00:09:53.130
+of Emacs Lisp.
+
+212
+00:09:54.610 --> 00:09:58.410
+We define a function, which, if the cell
+
+213
+00:09:58.410 --> 00:10:01.570
+value is bigger than 40, is going to
+
+214
+00:10:01.570 --> 00:10:03.850
+display it in a face which has a
+
+215
+00:10:03.850 --> 00:10:04.950
+dark red foreground.
+
+216
+00:10:05.950 --> 00:10:08.890
+We can now register this display function for
+
+217
+00:10:08.890 --> 00:10:11.590
+the measurement column in the temperatures table.
+
+218
+00:10:12.190 --> 00:10:16.490
+And if we reopen the table now, we
+
+219
+00:10:16.490 --> 00:10:19.950
+see that the anomalous measurements are indeed highlighted
+
+220
+00:10:19.950 --> 00:10:20.810
+in red.
+
+221
+00:10:24.100 --> 00:10:27.320
+Another example, imagine we have a table which
+
+222
+00:10:27.320 --> 00:10:28.880
+contains image data.
+
+223
+00:10:29.200 --> 00:10:31.740
+There's a column which is of BYTEA type,
+
+224
+00:10:31.740 --> 00:10:35.020
+which contains images in binary form.
+
+225
+00:10:35.340 --> 00:10:38.920
+We can display these inline as follows.
+
+226
+00:10:40.340 --> 00:10:44.900
+We create an inline image display function, using
+
+227
+00:10:44.900 --> 00:10:47.080
+Emacs' image support.
+
+228
+00:10:47.080 --> 00:10:49.540
+And then we'd register this function to display
+
+229
+00:10:49.540 --> 00:10:52.460
+the image column in the inline image table.
+
+230
+00:10:52.780 --> 00:10:55.540
+If we now reopen the inline image table,
+
+231
+00:10:56.060 --> 00:10:59.140
+we see the images are displayed inline.
+
+232
+00:10:59.660 --> 00:11:03.160
+And as a final example of customisation, here's
+
+233
+00:11:03.160 --> 00:11:05.440
+how to bind a key to a specific
+
+234
+00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:07.860
+function, in the row-list buffer.
+
+235
+00:11:08.800 --> 00:11:12.080
+Let's define a function that does a DuckDuckGo
+
+236
+00:11:12.080 --> 00:11:15.500
+lookup for a particular value in
+
+237
+00:11:15.500 --> 00:11:16.700
+the Emacs web browser.
+
+238
+00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:22.140
+We can define a function which does a
+
+239
+00:11:22.140 --> 00:11:24.400
+funcall on the cell value for this
+
+240
+00:11:24.400 --> 00:11:26.200
+DuckDuckGo lookup function.
+
+241
+00:11:27.100 --> 00:11:30.060
+And finally we can define a key, the
+
+242
+00:11:30.060 --> 00:11:33.360
+capital D key, in the row-list map,
+
+243
+00:11:33.540 --> 00:11:35.480
+which calls this function that does a
+
+244
+00:11:35.480 --> 00:11:36.900
+DuckDuckGo lookup.
+
+245
+00:11:37.240 --> 00:11:39.600
+And now if I'm browsing information in a
+
+246
+00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:41.580
+table that I want to do a web
+
+247
+00:11:41.580 --> 00:11:45.380
+search on, I can use my D shortcut
+
+248
+00:11:45.380 --> 00:11:48.580
+and see some web results concerning the cell.
+
+NOTE Conclusion
+
+249
+00:11:49.400 --> 00:11:53.880
+So to conclude, the source and installation instructions
+
+250
+00:11:53.880 --> 00:11:56.520
+for PGmacs are available on GitHub.
+
+251
+00:11:56.680 --> 00:11:58.780
+It requires Emacs 29.
+
+252
+00:11:59.260 --> 00:12:01.620
+There is a prebuilt container image which you
+
+253
+00:12:01.620 --> 00:12:02.820
+can use for testing.
+
+254
+00:12:02.980 --> 00:12:04.100
+It's a Docker image.
+
+255
+00:12:04.580 --> 00:12:06.160
+The Docker image only works in terminal mode.
+
+256
+00:12:06.160 --> 00:12:08.380
+And of course that's a recommended way of
+
+257
+00:12:08.380 --> 00:12:11.020
+testing Emacs Lisp code that you load
+
+258
+00:12:11.020 --> 00:12:13.100
+into your Emacs before having read it.
+
+259
+00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:15.720
+It works with any recent version of Postgres
+
+260
+00:12:15.720 --> 00:12:18.580
+over the past 10 years, including the latest
+
+261
+00:12:18.580 --> 00:12:19.900
+release, Postgres 17.
+
+262
+00:12:20.440 --> 00:12:22.700
+It does work with a certain number of
+
+263
+00:12:22.700 --> 00:12:26.440
+databases that are compatible with Postgres, such as
+
+264
+00:12:26.440 --> 00:12:30.360
+ParadeDB, TimescaleDB and IvorySQL.
+
+265
+00:12:30.940 --> 00:12:33.560
+However, it doesn't work with all databases that
+
+266
+00:12:33.560 --> 00:12:35.340
+claim to be Postgres compatible.
+
+267
+00:12:35.340 --> 00:12:37.840
+It doesn't work, for example, with CrateDB or
+
+268
+00:12:37.840 --> 00:12:39.960
+with CockroachDB or some others that you see
+
+269
+00:12:39.960 --> 00:12:40.640
+listed here.
+
+270
+00:12:40.760 --> 00:12:42.660
+The reason for that is that these databases
+
+271
+00:12:42.660 --> 00:12:46.440
+don't implement the system tables that PGmacs queries
+
+272
+00:12:46.440 --> 00:12:49.600
+to obtain information about the columns present in
+
+273
+00:12:49.600 --> 00:12:52.220
+a table, the size on disk, the ownership
+
+274
+00:12:52.220 --> 00:12:53.560
+of tables, etc.
+
+275
+00:12:54.600 --> 00:12:58.180
+PGmacs supports TLS encrypted connections to the database,
+
+276
+00:12:58.380 --> 00:13:01.400
+as well as local Unix socket connections.
+
+277
+00:13:02.040 --> 00:13:04.600
+And in terms of stability, I would classify
+
+278
+00:13:04.600 --> 00:13:06.160
+it as beta status.
+
+279
+00:13:06.680 --> 00:13:09.200
+I do use it myself in production on
+
+280
+00:13:09.200 --> 00:13:11.160
+some not very important data.
+
+281
+00:13:11.560 --> 00:13:13.060
+Really, it works quite well.
+
+282
+00:13:14.300 --> 00:13:15.420
+Thanks for your attention.
diff --git a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-sun-close--sunday-closing-remarks--main.vtt b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-sun-close--sunday-closing-remarks--main.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f43e8590
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-sun-close--sunday-closing-remarks--main.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+WEBVTT
+
+00:00.007 --> 00:03.045
+Hi again everyone, this is Leo, and I'm very sorry that I
+
+00:03.046 --> 00:06.284
+couldn't stick around to the very end of EmacsConf 2024.
+
+00:06.285 --> 00:09.843
+This is a recording, and hopefully this is playing as my
+
+00:09.844 --> 00:13.962
+co-organizers are closing EmacsConf 2024. There's just
+
+00:13.963 --> 00:17.761
+one last thing that I wanted to invite people to do, because
+
+00:17.762 --> 00:20.880
+for me, it was an honor to host the general track of EmacsConf
+
+00:20.881 --> 00:24.119
+this year again. It's my fifth time. But if you are
+
+00:24.120 --> 00:28.638
+interested in hosting, like me, or maybe transcribing
+
+00:28.639 --> 00:32.397
+pre-recordings, you know, captioning them, we do have
+
+00:32.398 --> 00:35.036
+plenty of roles open for people who want to contribute to
+
+00:35.037 --> 00:37.715
+EmacsConf. We do have a page on the website which is
+
+00:37.716 --> 00:40.794
+https://emacsconf.org/volunteer .
+
+00:40.795 --> 00:43.153
+You will find all the information about the roles that
+
+00:43.154 --> 00:45.460
+you can take. Just listing them very quickly.
+
+00:45.461 --> 00:47.152
+We've got captioners, as I mentioned.
+
+00:47.153 --> 00:49.230
+We've got hosts. We have
+
+00:49.231 --> 00:52.229
+Internet Relay Chat monitors, so IRC people to
+
+00:52.230 --> 00:00:53.800
+make sure that everyone is being nice
+
+00:00:53.801 --> 00:00:55.668
+in the chat and perhaps pasting
+
+00:55.669 --> 00:58.747
+questions from IRC to the pad. Speaking of the pad, we have
+
+00:58.748 --> 01:02.386
+pad scribes to make sure that all the questions and answers
+
+01:02.387 --> 01:05.105
+are documented in the pad. That makes our job much easier for
+
+01:05.106 --> 01:07.664
+the publishing process. When it comes to the publishing
+
+01:07.665 --> 01:09.663
+process, we've got everything that has to do with the
+
+01:09.664 --> 01:13.622
+pre-recordings, so people to process the audio of
+
+01:13.623 --> 01:18.101
+pre-recordings, re-encoding. We do have a lot of scripts
+
+01:18.102 --> 01:20.660
+that Sacha and myself have been writing to make our job much
+
+01:20.661 --> 01:24.459
+easier, but we are always in need of a pair of eyes to improve
+
+01:24.460 --> 01:28.138
+the process. Lastly, if you happen to have experience in
+
+01:28.139 --> 01:31.817
+infrastructure and video, we do need sysadmins to maintain
+
+01:31.818 --> 01:34.216
+the platform that we use for streaming, because again,
+
+01:34.217 --> 01:37.455
+everything we do is depending on remote machines, both for
+
+01:37.456 --> 01:42.334
+the streaming, the re-encoding, the transcription. If
+
+01:42.335 --> 01:45.013
+you have any interest in helping us with this, please send us
+
+01:45.014 --> 01:48.772
+an email. And all the information is on the website. All that
+
+01:48.773 --> 01:52.171
+remains for me is to say thank you so much for coming to
+
+01:52.172 --> 01:54.650
+EmacsConf, thanks to all the speakers for the wonderful
+
+01:54.651 --> 00:01:57.792
+talks, and I will most likely see you next year.
+
+00:01:57.793 --> 00:01:59.209
+Have fun, everyone!