diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-blee--about-blee-towards-an-integrated-emacs-environment-for-enveloping-our-own-autonomy-directed-digital-ecosystem--mohsen-banan--answers.vtt | 42 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-blee--about-blee-towards-an-integrated-emacs-environment-for-enveloping-our-own-autonomy-directed-digital-ecosystem--mohsen-banan--answers.vtt b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-blee--about-blee-towards-an-integrated-emacs-environment-for-enveloping-our-own-autonomy-directed-digital-ecosystem--mohsen-banan--answers.vtt index 47d7b53b..581313d4 100644 --- a/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-blee--about-blee-towards-an-integrated-emacs-environment-for-enveloping-our-own-autonomy-directed-digital-ecosystem--mohsen-banan--answers.vtt +++ b/2024/captions/emacsconf-2024-blee--about-blee-towards-an-integrated-emacs-environment-for-enveloping-our-own-autonomy-directed-digital-ecosystem--mohsen-banan--answers.vtt @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ had two very distinct parts, one which dealt with a philosophy of Libre-Halaal software and then the application, 00:00:12.080 --> 00:00:14.279 -obviously, of Bisos. So thank you so much for the +obviously, of BISOS. So thank you so much for the 00:00:14.280 --> 00:00:17.839 presentation. Before we get started with the question, and @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ And I'm all for that. So the idea of BLEE is that Others can package things, and we are seeing this in the form 00:01:32.600 --> 00:01:38.119 -of redistributions. There is Doom, there is Space Max, and +of redistributions. There is Doom, there is Spacemacs, and 00:01:38.120 --> 00:01:44.079 we are seeing the evolution of Emacs into layers. So there is @@ -85,16 +85,16 @@ So that was one idea. The other idea or the other theme throughout the various talks that we saw was this concept of 00:02:42.920 --> 00:02:53.519 -mixing org mode with programming languages and What Babel +mixing org-mode with programming languages and what Babel 00:02:53.520 --> 00:03:00.479 has done is two things. One is it has successfully 00:03:00.480 --> 00:03:06.799 -integrated org mode with all kinds of languages. And that +integrated org-mode with all kinds of languages. And that 00:03:06.800 --> 00:03:13.039 -has happened in the context of literate programming. Um, so +has happened in the context of literate programming. So 00:03:13.040 --> 00:03:16.839 a talk coming after mine is literate programming for the @@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ a talk coming after mine is literate programming for the what I am saying is that there is an alternative and that's 00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:33.839 -great, but we should also, uh, consider a traditional +great, but we should also, consider a traditional 00:03:33.840 --> 00:03:40.159 -programming mixed with org mode and, um, Polymode is key to +programming mixed with org-mode and, polymode is key to 00:03:40.160 --> 00:03:49.239 that. So those were some of the key concepts that I saw a @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ various talks last year, but it also tends to have a similar stance than you, with the fact that text should be embedded 00:04:18.920 --> 00:04:21.919 -in programming languages rather than having Org Mode +in programming languages rather than having Org-Mode 00:04:21.920 --> 00:04:25.439 implement, I mean, integrate other languages. And I found @@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ fit into my talk is that the several concepts that I introduced, namely 00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:57.879 -dynamic blocks everywhere and COMEEGA. +Dynamic Blocks everywhere and COMEEGA. 00:04:57.880 --> 00:05:07.719 -I'd be happy to expand on those by sharing your screen in due +I'd be happy to expand on those by sharing a screen in due 00:05:07.720 --> 00:05:12.519 course, whatever is appropriate. Sure, considering the @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ Right. So definitely, I would say for everybody who is on this conference, the international edition is the right 00:06:01.960 --> 00:06:11.639 -choice. In this book, I take some aggressive stance against +choice. In this book, I take some aggressive stances against 00:06:11.640 --> 00:06:19.279 intellectual property and I link that specifically to the @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ I haven't read much of that. I think there is a whole lot of global growth and collective understanding towards this 00:07:34.200 --> 00:07:42.479 -notion that the direction we are headed in And by that, I mean +notion that the direction we are headed in and by that, I mean 00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:46.879 American digital ecosystems @@ -354,22 +354,22 @@ this intersect? Let me read this for a moment. Yeah, I am not sure I fully get the point, but. Let me make a 00:10:30.600 --> 00:10:35.959 -point about my criticisms of the false movement +point about my criticisms of the FOSS movement 00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:47.399 in the presentation and in the book. The idea is that we have 00:10:47.400 --> 00:10:53.919 -jumped on the false movement and recognize it as an +jumped on the FOSS movement and recognize it as an 00:10:53.920 --> 00:11:02.279 -alternative But we haven't looked deeply enough to see if +alternative but we haven't looked deeply enough to see if 00:11:02.280 --> 00:11:07.759 our own philosophy and movement have problems. The 00:11:07.760 --> 00:11:14.959 -problems that I note is that The first movement does not +problems that I note is that the FOSS movement does not 00:11:14.960 --> 00:11:21.279 recognize clearly and explicitly that the entirety of the @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ piece is that it's only now that we are seeing the FOSS movement is broader than the Western world. The third 00:11:45.480 --> 00:11:54.919 -problem is that the labels of free software and open source +problem is that the labels of Free Software and Open Source 00:11:54.920 --> 00:12:01.159 are not necessarily correct. The fourth problem is that we @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ still live for 15 more seconds, do you have any last words? Keep up the good work. Those would be my last words, that the 00:13:09.040 --> 00:13:14.239 -free software and the open source and Emacs are a very valid +Free Software and the Open Source and Emacs are a very valid 00:13:14.240 --> 00:13:24.479 strategy for inside of IPR resistance. And thank you, Leo @@ -480,19 +480,19 @@ Hi, John. I was looking at the questions. 00:14:38.080 --> 00:14:46.239 -To see if there is more that I can add. So. +To see if there is more that I can add. So, 00:14:46.240 --> 00:14:54.919 through the regard of societal impacts on ethical, 00:14:54.920 --> 00:14:58.439 -philosophical and wider force community. I'm involved in +philosophical and wider FOSS community. I'm involved in 00:14:58.440 --> 00:15:02.239 politics in my country, my party is very sympathetic to 00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:05.277 -force ideas and I have public... +FOSS ideas and I have public... NOTE Q: Do you have any recommended reading materials designed for such an audience? |