summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/2021
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--2021/talks/pattern.md5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/2021/talks/pattern.md b/2021/talks/pattern.md
index f27f15b2..36dec9f2 100644
--- a/2021/talks/pattern.md
+++ b/2021/talks/pattern.md
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Pad:
this context. I think org-roam, in many ways, resembles what
he had in mind with Xandadu; well, with the limitation that
org-roam only serves Personal Information Management, not
- our civilisations' as he intended with Xanadu.
+ our civilisations' as he intended with Xanadu._
- A: That's an interesting point - and related to how org-roam writer Leo is now extending org-roam to collaborative work as he explains in his talk <https://emacsconf.org/2021/talks/erg/>.
- Yes! the feeling is mutual :) I really love Ricoeur's general
style and approach to questions. Unfortunately he didn't write
@@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ IRC:
- if I may ask, what's the little toy figure in the background, looks nice :D
- A wooden (fake) Transformer :)
- do you think emacs could have implemented with this design pattern, but in another programming language?
- - Emacs Lisp as a dialect of Lisp shares its philosophical qualities. I often think about what Norvig wrote about Lisp back in the day, e.g. <https://www.norvig.com/lisp_talk_final.htm>, and while there are some people who feel strongly that Lisp's time is passed, I think that Emacs shows that it is the opposite: that we haven't fully taken advantage of Lisp's potential. Another example would be what Rick Hickey has done with Clojure, and recommend his talk Are We There Yet, <https://github.com/matthiasn/talk-transcripts/blob/master/Hickey_Rich/AreWeThereYet.md>.
+ - Emacs Lisp as a dialect of Lisp shares its philosophical qualities. I often think about what Norvig wrote about Lisp back in the day, e.g. <https://www.norvig.com/lisp_talk_final.htm>, and while there are some people who feel strongly that Lisp's time is passed, I think that Emacs shows that it is the opposite: that we haven't fully taken advantage of Lisp's potential. Another example would be what Rick Hickey has done with Clojure, and recommend his talk Are We There Yet, <https://github.com/matthiasn/talk-transcripts/blob/master/Hickey_Rich/AreWeThereYet.md>.
+
Feedback:
- That's a great point about the sketches, and why Emacs graphical improvements are important.