summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/2026
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIhor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>2026-10-20 05:25:02 +0200
committerIhor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>2026-10-20 05:26:12 +0200
commit465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9 (patch)
tree3afe5899b110eb5c277a12144f323c82dd30dd1c /2026
parent4dae3ad5fba98262b2a55f1add8addd4f47c0f61 (diff)
downloademacsconf-wiki-465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9.tar.xz
emacsconf-wiki-465cdbf12955f244c97c352211608ce0fb27ccb9.zip
2026/talks/llms.md: Use the latest version of questions
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--2026/talks/llms.md7
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/2026/talks/llms.md b/2026/talks/llms.md
index 61dc86f8..65072339 100644
--- a/2026/talks/llms.md
+++ b/2026/talks/llms.md
@@ -45,12 +45,13 @@ Questions:
1. If you were to imagine an ideal AI software you would use with
Emacs, how would it look like? How would it **not** look like? What
freedoms it would need to have? Feel free to answer anything, not
- limiting yourself to current LLM architectures.
+ limiting yourself to current LLM architectures. If your answer is
+ that no such software should exist, that is a valid answer.
2. What is the most useful application of LLMs with Emacs for you
personally? If you are not using LLMs, imagine that there is an
- ideal AI or complex automation software you would be willing to use
- and come up with such application.
+ ideal AI or complex automation software (non-AI) you would be
+ willing to use and come up with such application.
3. What is the most critical use case in your Emacs workflows where
you would **avoid** using AI?