Add sid's chapter markers

2 files changed, 113 insertions, 48 deletions

diff --git a/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers--chapters.vtt b/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers--chapters.vtt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..14147527
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers--chapters.vtt
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+WEBVTT
+
+
+00:00:18.720 --> 00:02:07.680
+Short recap of what the talk was about?
+
+00:02:09.280 --> 00:04:03.914
+What's the incentive to pay?
+
+00:04:04.014 --> 00:04:23.205
+What do you think of projects like OpenQ?
+
+00:04:23.305 --> 00:07:39.789
+Are you aware of SourceCred?
+
+00:07:39.889 --> 00:08:58.080
+How is this different from money?
+
+00:08:58.080 --> 00:10:33.899
+How would you approach a viable experiment for ABE?
+
+00:10:33.999 --> 00:13:28.080
+How do you constrain the cognitive and time burdens of deciding the values of attributed contributions?
+
+00:13:29.360 --> 00:16:29.720
+How are the attribution amounts calculated?
+
+00:16:29.820 --> 00:17:27.360
+Synchronicity with Bastien's talk last year
+
+00:17:28.960 --> 00:21:15.920
+What are your assumptions about human nature?
+
+00:21:17.680 --> 00:21:44.902
+What is the URL of the project?
+
+00:21:45.002 --> 00:22:29.420
+Check out the prototype, "Old Abe"
+
+00:22:29.520 --> 00:23:50.320
+Closing Remarks
+
+00:23:50.320 --> 00:25:09.280
+A flicker of light and following your curiosity
diff --git a/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers.vtt b/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers.vtt
index f7dd1b18..80a659b8 100644
--- a/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers.vtt
+++ b/2022/captions/emacsconf-2022-maint--maintaining-the-maintainers-attribution-as-an-economic-model-for-open-source--sid-kasivajhula--answers.vtt
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 WEBVTT
 
 00:00.000 --> 00:08.160
-now. We seem to be back. Sorry for the little shuffling chairs around. We are now live with
+Okay, so we seem to be back. Sorry for the little shuffling chairs around. We are now live with
 
 00:08.160 --> 00:16.400
 Sid. Hi, Sid. Let me contextualize a little bit for the people because we are on Gen right now
 
-00:16.400 --> 00:22.800
-and the talk was happening on Dev. Sid, can I ask you explaining what your talk was about in about
+00:16.400 --> 00:00:18.620
+and the talk was happening on Dev.
+
+NOTE Short recap of what the talk was about?
+
+00:00:18.720 --> 00:00:22.800
+Sid, can I ask you explaining what your talk was about in about
 
 00:22.800 --> 00:28.560
 one to two minutes? Yes, sure. The talk was called Maintaining the Maintainer's Attribution
@@ -63,6 +68,8 @@ time is going to dilute, we'll have to stick with strict adherence to chronology
 02:02.800 --> 02:07.680
 starting with Sid, do you want to take the first question on the pad? Okay, let's look at them.
 
+NOTE What's the incentive to pay?
+
 02:09.280 --> 02:14.960
 So the first question is, this seems to assume that there will be money contributions commensured
 
@@ -120,14 +127,24 @@ to figure these out, so there's promising angles here, but I think we have a lot
 03:56.480 --> 04:03.360
 well. Should I go to the second question? Yeah, feel free to do so, you are the master, you're
 
-04:03.360 --> 04:11.040
-in Q&A. Okay, so the second question is, are you aware of projects like OpenQ, would that fit the
+04:03.360 --> 00:04:03.914
+in Q&A.
+
+NOTE What do you think of projects like OpenQ?
+
+00:04:04.014 --> 00:04:11.040
+Okay, so the second question is, are you aware of projects like OpenQ, would that fit the
 
 04:11.040 --> 04:18.960
 model in your opinion? I'm actually not familiar with OpenQ, so maybe I should just move on to the
 
-04:18.960 --> 04:25.840
-next question and come back to that if we have time. Sure. The next one says, I see incredible
+04:18.960 --> 00:04:23.205
+next question and come back to that if we have time. Sure.
+
+NOTE Are you aware of SourceCred?
+
+00:04:23.305 --> 00:04:25.840
+The next one says, I see incredible
 
 04:25.840 --> 04:30.800
 amounts of overlap with the source cred system, where attribution of antecedents, graph of
@@ -237,8 +254,13 @@ but we are going to be opening the pad in about six to seven minutes if you want
 07:30.400 --> 07:35.520
 questions live to Sid, but in the meantime, Sid, sorry, I'm getting tired, it's late, in the meantime,
 
-07:35.520 --> 07:41.280
-Sid, feel free to answer more questions. Sure, okay, thank you. The next question is,
+07:35.520 --> 00:07:39.789
+Sid, feel free to answer more questions. Sure, okay, thank you.
+
+NOTE How is this different from money?
+
+00:07:39.889 --> 00:07:41.280
+The next question is,
 
 07:41.280 --> 07:46.480
 how is this different from money? Not in some abstract ownership versus attribution way.
@@ -279,6 +301,8 @@ can invest in open-source projects, which is a new incentive, and, you know, we
 08:53.520 --> 08:58.080
 how there are some unopened questions. I'm not sure if this is one of them.
 
+NOTE How would you approach a viable experiment for ABE?
+
 08:58.080 --> 09:07.680
 How would you approach a viable experiment? So, the prototype that we have, that we talked about
 
@@ -321,8 +345,13 @@ just one or two repos, because there's tremendous number of unresolved questions
 10:19.840 --> 10:27.360
 to be resolved through dialogue, agreement. We all decide how this thing works, and I think,
 
-10:27.360 --> 10:36.400
-you know, there's, yeah, so we'll see about how the experiment goes. Next question, given that
+10:27.360 --> 00:10:33.899
+you know, there's, yeah, so we'll see about how the experiment goes.
+
+NOTE How do you constrain the cognitive and time burdens of deciding the values of attributed contributions?
+
+00:10:33.999 --> 00:10:36.400
+Next question, given that
 
 10:36.400 --> 10:45.040
 oversight is a social process, how do you constrain the cognitive and time burdens of deciding the
@@ -411,6 +440,8 @@ Sid, you can answer more questions. Sure. Should we take one from the field?
 13:25.360 --> 13:28.080
 I guess while people are thinking about it, I'll take one more question, maybe.
 
+NOTE How are the attribution amounts calculated?
+
 13:29.360 --> 13:37.440
 Okay. So, the next question is, how are the attribution amounts calculated?
 
@@ -495,8 +526,13 @@ be divided amongst all of these antecedents and contributors. Let's see, what's
 16:22.800 --> 16:26.240
 Okay, the next question is being written down as we speak.
 
-16:26.240 --> 16:33.200
-It's fine, we can wait a little bit. In the meantime, I'll just mention,
+16:26.240 --> 00:16:29.720
+It's fine, we can wait a little bit.
+
+NOTE Synchronicity with Bastien's talk last year
+
+00:16:29.820 --> 00:16:33.200
+In the meantime, I'll just mention,
 
 16:35.360 --> 16:41.360
 so actually, when we keep track of presentation for Emacs, we do have slugs for them. And this
@@ -525,6 +561,8 @@ year? I have not, but that sounds very interesting. I'll definitely check it out
 17:22.080 --> 17:27.360
 Right. And I will now stop my blabbering, and you can answer the last question.
 
+NOTE What are your assumptions about human nature?
+
 17:28.960 --> 17:32.640
 The last question is, what are your assumptions about human nature,
 
@@ -639,6 +677,8 @@ mistaken. That's the last one I see. Yes. Well, you did a fine job answering, ho
 21:09.920 --> 21:15.920
 questions before. Again, very lengthy, as you said, but very eloquent, as I will say to you.
 
+NOTE What is the URL of the project?
+
 21:17.680 --> 21:22.080
 There is one question that appeared on ISE, which was the URL of the project. You mentioned
 
@@ -651,8 +691,13 @@ check it, and I'll place it on ISE for the person that was asking? Or on BBB, it
 21:34.000 --> 21:41.520
 It's actually dream-org. Oh, that's why I did dream.org, which was the problem.
 
-21:43.840 --> 21:47.280
-It's the GitHub repo. And actually, sorry, you should also check out
+21:43.840 --> 00:21:44.902
+It's the GitHub repo.
+
+NOTE Check out the prototype, "Old Abe"
+
+00:21:45.002 --> 00:21:47.280
+And actually, sorry, you should also check out
 
 21:48.480 --> 21:55.840
 dream-org.old-abe. That is the billing prototype, which is the GitHub action,
@@ -669,8 +714,13 @@ dash org slash old-abe.
 22:18.080 --> 22:25.280
 It's good for you for remembering it. I will place this in BBB right now. Sorry,
 
-22:25.280 --> 22:32.640
-not in BBB, in the pad so that people can click on it. Sid, is there anything else you'd like to
+22:25.280 --> 00:22:29.420
+not in BBB, in the pad so that people can click on it.
+
+NOTE Closing Remarks
+
+00:22:29.520 --> 00:22:32.640
+Sid, is there anything else you'd like to
 
 22:32.640 --> 22:41.200
 say? We are about at the end of the Q&A right now. I guess attribution-based economics is open for
@@ -711,6 +761,8 @@ people to join. So I encourage you to do so. Thank you. Well, thank you. You've
 23:45.920 --> 23:50.320
 made a very nice case for it, and people can make their own minds now by checking the link.
 
+NOTE A flicker of light and following your curiosity
+
 23:50.320 --> 23:55.280
 We really encourage you to follow up on a lot of the talks. It's one thing. One thing that we always
 
@@ -752,34 +804,3 @@ that we've presented to you today. So thank you so much, Sid, for all your time,
 
 25:04.960 --> 25:09.280
 presentation, and your answers. Thank you so much, Leo. Appreciate it. Thanks for having me.
-
-25:10.320 --> 25:14.480
-Great. I'll still make some last-minute announcement. So we are still running,
-
-25:14.480 --> 25:23.280
-sorry, the elves are yelling in my ears again. We will be waiting a little bit for the track,
-
-25:24.480 --> 25:29.280
-development track to finish, which should take about five to ten minutes, and we will reconvene
-
-25:29.280 --> 25:33.920
-in seven minutes in this channel for the closing remarks for day one. So see you in a bit,
-
-25:33.920 --> 25:48.000
-and thank you again, Sid. Thank you. Okay, Sid, we are not live anymore. Thank you so much. I need
-
-25:48.000 --> 25:51.040
-to get going. I need to prepare the closing remarks. All right. Thank you so much, Leo.
-
-25:51.040 --> 25:57.760
-Appreciate it. Where can I watch the closing remarks? Closing remarks? You go to emacs.org
-
-25:57.760 --> 26:03.520
-slash 2022. You'll have everything over there. Watch. I'm going to give you the page. I have
-
-26:03.520 --> 26:11.280
-the time to do this. 22, watch. Check on BBB. We will be on the general channel in about
-
-26:11.280 --> 26:28.240
-six minutes. Okay, perfect. Thanks, Leo. See you in a bit. See ya.
-